Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 17–44 | Cite as

A time-use investigation of shopping participation in three Canadian cities: is there evidence of social exclusion?

  • Steven Farber
  • Antonio Páez
  • Ruben G. Mercado
  • Matthew Roorda
  • Catherine Morency
Article

Abstract

Increasing awareness and concern about the status of mobility-disadvantaged groups in society has given rise to a wide body of research that focuses on the social exclusion dimension of transportation. To date, much of the empirical work on this topic is mainly spatial in nature despite recent developments that call for the inclusion of time use analyses in social exclusion research. In this paper we attempt to fill this gap by estimating activity and trip durations to determine whether poverty, old age, or being a single parent results in time use patterns indicative of exclusion. Given the importance of shopping and using services for social inclusion objectives, these activities are the focus of this investigation. In terms of methods, use of a multiple equation approach allows for the estimation of the daily duration of shopping activities and trips while simultaneously controlling for daily durations of four broad categories of activities as well as their associated travel times. The results indicate: that being a senior citizen increases travel durations while decreasing shopping activity durations; that coming from a low income household decreases shopping activity durations; and single-parent status does not impact shopping activity durations when holding income and other activity durations constant. These results highlight the feasibility and challenges of time-use and activity analysis in social exclusion research.

Keywords

Social exclusion Mobility Accessibility Time-use Shopping duration Shopping trip duration Simultaneous equation model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Human Resources and Skills Development Canada for this project.

References

  1. Axhausen, K.W., Zimmermann, A., Schonfelder, S., Rindsfuser, G., Haupt, T.: Observing the rhythms of daily life: a six-week travel diary. Transportation 29(2), 95–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhat, C.R.: A hazard-based duration model of shopping activity with nonparametric baseline specification and nonparametric control for unobserved heterogeneity. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 30(3), 189–207 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat, C.R.: A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 39(8), 679–707 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat, C.R., Frusti, T., Zhao, H.M., Schonfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Intershopping duration: an analysis using multiweek data. Transp. Res. B Methodol 38(1), 39–60 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhat, C.R., Koppelman, F.S.: A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research. Transportation 26(2), 119–139 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bittman, M.: Social participation and family welfare: the money and time costs of leisure in Australia. Soc. Policy Adm. 36(4), 408–425 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buliung, R.N., Kanaroglou, P.S.: Activity-travel behavior research: conceptual issues, state of the art, and emerging perspectives on behavioural analysis and simulation modelling. Transp. Rev. 27(2), 151–187 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrasco, J.A., Hogan, B., Wellman, B., Miller, E.J. (2005) Collecting social network data to study social-activity travel behaviour: an egocentered approach Paper presented at the international workshop frontiers in transportation: social and spatial interactions, Amsterdam, 02–05 JulyGoogle Scholar
  9. Casas, I.: Social exclusion and the disabled: an accessibility approach. Prof. Geogr. 59(4), 463–477 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cass, N., Shove, E., Urry, J.: Social exclusion, mobility and access. Sociol. Rev. 53(3), 539–555 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Church, A., Frost, M., Sullivan, K.: Transport and social exclusion in London. Transp. Policy 7(3), 195–205 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Church, R.L., Marston, J.R.: Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geogr. Anal. 35(1), 83–96 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, G., Eyre, H., Guy, C.: Deriving indicators of access to food retail provision in British cities: Studies of Cardiff, Leeds and Bradford. Urban Stud. 39(11), 2041–2060 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cullen, I., Godson, V.: Urban networks: the structure of activity patterns. Prog. Plann. 4, 1–96 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dagfinn, Å.: Studies of time-use: problems and prospects. Acta Sociologica 21(2), 125–141 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dugundji, E.R., Walker, J.L.: Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies—an empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects. Travel Demand 2005(1921), 70–78 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. Fang, H.A.: A discrete–continuous model of households’ vehicle choice and usage, with an application to the effects of residential density. Transp. Res. B-Methodol. 42(9), 736–758 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farber, S., Páez, A.: My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary investigation of automobility and social activity participation. J. Transp. Geogr. 17, 216–225 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, L., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., Lawton, T.K.: Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation 35(1), 37–54 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frederick, J.: As time goes by…: time use by Canadians. Stat. Can. (1995)Google Scholar
  21. Garhammer, M.: Time pressure in modern Germany. Loisir & Societe-Society Leisure 21(2), 327–352 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. Gliebe, J.P., Koppelman, F.S.: A model of joint activity participation between household members. Transportation 29(1), 49–72 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Golob, T.F.: A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 34(5), 355–376 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Golob, T.F., Mcnally, M.G.: A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 31(3), 177–194 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goulias, K.G.: Multilevel analysis of daily time use and time allocation to activity types accounting for complex covariance structures using correlated random effects. Transportation 29(1), 31–48 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)Google Scholar
  27. Hagerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? Pap. Reg. Sci. Assoc. 24, 7–21 (1970)Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, A.S.: Time use and activity systems. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J., Haynes, K.E., Stopher, P.R. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, pp. 627–646. Elselvier, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  29. Harvey, A.S., Taylor, M.E.: Activity settings and travel behavior: a social contact perspective. Transportation 27(1), 53–73 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heckman, J.J.: Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1), 153–161 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hine, J.: Social exclusion and transport systems. Transp. Policy 10(4), 263 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jain, J., Guiver, J.: Turning the car inside out: transport, equity and environment. Soc. Policy Adm. 35(5), 569–586 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Javeau, C.: The trip to work: the application of the time-budget method to problems arising from commuting between residence and workplace. In: Szalai, A. (ed.) The Use of Time. The Hague, Mouton (1972)Google Scholar
  34. Kenyon, S.: Understanding social exclusion and social inclusion. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.-Munic. Eng. 156, 97–104 (2003)Google Scholar
  35. Kenyon, S., Rafferty, J., Lyons, G.: Social exclusion and transport in the UK: a role for virtual accessibility in the alleviation of mobility-related social exclusion? J. Soc. Policy 32, 317–338 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kenyon, S., Lyons, G.: Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: examining its extent and assessing its potential importance. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 41(2), 161–175 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kockelman, K.: A model for time- and budget-constrained activity demand analysis. Transp. Res. B 35(3), 255–269 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucas, M.T., Nicholson, C.F.: Subsidized vehicle acquisition and earned income in the transition from welfare to work. Transportation 30(4), 483–501 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lyons, G.: The introduction of social exclusion into the field of travel behavior. Transp. Policy 10(4), 339–342 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mccray, T., Brais, N.: Exploring the role of transportation in fostering social exclusion: The use of GIS to support qualitative data. Netw. Spatial Econ. 7(4), 397–412 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mcnally, M.: The four-step model. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Modelling, pp. 33–52. Pergamon, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  42. Miller, H.J.: Necessary space-time conditions for human interaction. Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des. 32, 381–401 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Minge-Klevana, W.: Does labor time decrease with industrialization? A survey of time-allocation studies. Curr. Anthropol. 21(3), 279 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mohammadian, A., Bekhor, S.: Travel behavior of special population groups. Transportation 35(5), 579–583 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neutens, T., Van De Weghe, N., Witlox, F., DE Maeyer, P.: A three-dimensional network-based space-time prism. J. Geogr. Syst. 10(1), 89–107 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Páez, A., Habib, K.M.N., Bonin, J.: A joint ordinal-continuous model for episode generation and duration analysis. Paper presented at the 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 11–15 January (2009)Google Scholar
  47. Páez, A., Mercado, R.G., Farber, S., Morency, C., Roorda, M.: Relative accessibility deprivation indicators for urban settings: definitions and application to food deserts in Montreal, Urban Studies (2010, in press)Google Scholar
  48. Páez, A., Scott, D.M.: Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environ. Plann. A 39(3), 647–665 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pendyala, R.M., Goulias, K.G.: Time use and activity perspectives in travel behavior research. Transportation 29(1), 1–4 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Preston, J., Raje, F.: Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. J. Transp. Geogr. 15(3), 151–160 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raje, F.: Engineering social exclusion? Poor transport links and severance. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.-Munic. Eng. 157(4):267–273 (2004)Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, J.P., Godbey, G.: Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. Pen State Press, University Park (1997)Google Scholar
  53. Rosen, D., Shankar, V.N., Ulfarsson, G.F.: Relationship of shopping activity duration and travel time with planning-level network and socioeconomic factors. Travel Behav. Values 2004(1894), 160–169 (2004)Google Scholar
  54. Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Activity spaces: measures of social exclusion? Transp. Policy 10(4), 273–286 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwanen, T.: The determinants of shopping duration on workdays in The Netherlands. J. Transp. Geogr. 12(1), 35–48 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott, D.M., Kanaroglou, P.S.: An activity-episode generation model that captures interactions between household heads: development and empirical analysis. Transp. Res. B Methodol 36(10), 875–896 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Social Exclusion Unit: Making the Connections: Final Report on Transportation and Social Exclusion. HMSO, London (2003)Google Scholar
  58. Statistics Canada: The 2005 General Social Survey—Cycle 19 Time Use: Public Use Microdata File Documentation and User Guide, Product No. 12M0019-GPE (2006)Google Scholar
  59. Ye, X., Pendyala, R.M., Gottardi, G.: An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 41(1), 96–113 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zellner, A., Theil, H.: Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 30(1), 54–78 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Farber
    • 1
  • Antonio Páez
    • 1
  • Ruben G. Mercado
    • 2
  • Matthew Roorda
    • 3
  • Catherine Morency
    • 4
  1. 1.McMaster Institute for Transport and Logistics, School of Geography and Earth SciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Cities CentreUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Département des génies civilGéologique et des mines, École Polytechnique de Montréal Casier postal 6079MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations