Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 27–46 | Cite as

What is responsible for the response lag of a significant change in discretionary time use: the built environment, family and social obligations, temporal constraints, or a psychological delay factor?

  • Cynthia Chen
  • Jason Chen
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we used the 10-wave Puget Sound Panel Dataset to investigate the response lag of a significant change in discretionary time use. In particular, we want to quantify the relative magnitude of the following factors: the built environment, family and social obligations, temporal constraints, or a psychological delay factor (people delay a behavioral change until the next life shock). To answer this question, we developed a survival model to treat (1) left-censoring, (2) partial observation, and (3) multi-type exits. The results suggest that family and social obligations, as well as temporal constraints, appear to play a more important role than the built environment. Support for the psychological delay factor is not evident. We also found that the probability of having a significant change in discretionary time use is negatively related to time progression, supporting the human adaptivity hypothesis.

Keywords

Response lag Discretionary time use left-censoring Partial observation Competing risk survival analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to Mr. Neil Kilgren and other staff members at the Puget Sound Regional Council who relentlessly helped us obtain various datasets and answered our numerous questions during the long course of this study. We also want to thank Fred Mannering, Ryuichi Kitamura and four anonymous reviewers for their comments. Any remaining errors are the authors’ responsibility.

References

  1. Amemiya, T.: A note on left censoring. In: Hsiao, C., Pesaran, M.H., Lahiri, K., Lee, L.-F. (eds.) Analysis of Panels and Limited Dependent Variable Models, pp. 7–22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  2. Banister, D.: The influence of habit formation on modal choice—a Heuristic Model. Transportation 7, 19–33 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat, R.C.: A generalized multiple durations proportional Hazard Model with an application to activity behavior during the evening work-to-home commute. Transp. Res. Part B 30(6), 465–480 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buhaug, H.: Dangerous Dyads revisited: democracies may not be that peaceful after all. Conflict Manage. Peace Sci. 22(2), 95–111 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, C., Lin, J.: Making an informed vehicle scrappage decision. Trans. Rev. 26(6), 731–748 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, C., McKnight, C.: Does the built environment make a difference? Additional evidence from the daily activity and travel behavior of homemakers living in NYC and Suburbs. J. Transp. Geogr. 15(6), 380–395 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C., Mokhtarian, P.: Tradeoffs between time allocations to maintenance activities/travel and discretionary activities/travel. Transportation 33, 223–240 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, C., Niemeier, D.: A mass point vehicle scrappage model. Transp. Res. Part B 39(5), 401–415 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, C., Garling, T., Kitamura, R.: Activity rescheduling: deliberate or habitual? Transp. Res. Part F 7(6), 351–371 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Chen, C., Gong, H., Paaswell, R.: Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 35(3), 285–299 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, M., Dix, M., Goodwin, P.: Some issues of dynamics in forecasting travel behavior – a discussion paper. Transportation 11(2), 153–172 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.W., Tversky, A.: Mathematical Psychology, An Elementary Introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1970)Google Scholar
  13. Diamond, P., Hausman, J.: The retirement and unemployment behavior of older men. In Aaron, H., Burtless G. (eds.) Retirement and Economic Behavior. Brookings Institute, Washington DC, pp. 97–134 (1984)Google Scholar
  14. Doohee, N., Fred, M.: An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident duration. Transp. Res.: Part A: Policy Pract. 34(2), 85–102 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fasolo, B., Misuraca, R., McClelland, G.H.: Individual differences in adaptive choice strategies. Research in Economics 57(3), 219–233 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freda, C., Sudipto, B., Bradley, P.C., Debajyoti, S.: Flexible cure rate modeling under latent activation schemes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 102(478), 560–572 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilbert, C.: A duration model of automobile ownership. Transp. Res. Part B 26(2), 222–242 (1992)Google Scholar
  18. Golob, T.F.: The Dynamics of Household Travel Time Expenditures and Car Ownership Decisions. The University of California Transportation Center, (1990)Google Scholar
  19. Goodwin, P.B.: Family changes and public transport use 1984–1987: a dynamic analysis using panel data. Transportation 16, 121–154 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2003)Google Scholar
  21. Hagerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? Reg. Sci. Assoc. 24, 7–21 (1970)Google Scholar
  22. Hachen, S.D.: The competing risks model. A method for analyzing processes with multiple types of events. Sociol. Methods Res. 17(1), 21–54 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanaki, N.: Individual and social learning. Comput. Econ. 26(3–4), 213–232 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. Han, A., Hausman, J.A.: Flexible parametric estimation of duration and competing risk models. J. Appl. Econom. 5, 1–28 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hensher, D., Johnson, L.: Application of Multinomial Probit to a Time Series of Cross-sections Data Set. Conference on Disaggregate Travel Demand Models, Leeds University (1980)Google Scholar
  26. Hensher, D., Mannering, F.: Hazard-based duration models and their application to transport analysis. Transp. Rev. 14(1), 63–82 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joly, I.: Stability or regularity of the daily travel time in lyon? Application of a duration model. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 33(3), 369–400 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. Kitamura, R.: A causal analysis of car ownership and transit use. Transportation 16, 155–173 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kitamura, R.: Panel analysis in transportation planning: an overview. Transp. Res. Part A 24(6), 401–415 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kitamura, R.: Time use: Workshop Report. In Mahmassani, H.S. (ed.) In Perpetual Motion – Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges. Elsevier Science, Limited, Oxford, UK, pp. 333–338 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. Kitamura, R., Yamamoto, T., Fujii, S.: The effectiveness of panels in detecting changes in discrete travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part B 37(2), 191–206 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kockelman, K.: Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land use mixing and land use balance: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Transp. Res. Board 1607, 116–125 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krizek, K.: Residential relocation and changes in urban travel. APA J. 69(3), 265–281 (2003)Google Scholar
  34. Li, Y., Lin, X.: Semiparametric normal transformation models for spatially correlated survival data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101(474), 591–603 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin, J., Chen, C., Niemeier, D.: An analysis on long term emission benefits of a government vehicle fleet replacement plan in Northern Illinois. Transportation 35, 219–235 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma, J., Goulias, K.G.: A dynamic analysis of person and household activity and travel patterns using data from first two waves in the puget sound transportation panel. Transportation 24, 309–331 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ma, J., Goulias, K.G.: Multivariate marginal frequency analysis of activity and travel patterns in first four waves of puget sound. Transp. Res. Rec. 1556, 67–76 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Omariba, D., Walter, R., Beaujot, R., Rajulton, F.: Determinants of infant and child mortality in Kenya: an analysis controlling for frailty effects. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 26(3), 299–321 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pas, E.I.: State of the art and research opportunities in travel demand: another perspective. Transp. Res. A 19(5/6), 460–464 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pas, E.I.: Recent advances in activity-based travel demand modeling. In Texas Transportation Institute (eds.) Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, June 2–5, 1996 Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers. Travel Model Improvement Program, U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., pp. 79–102 (1996)Google Scholar
  41. Pendyala, R.: Time use and travel behavior in space and time (Chapter 2). In: Goulias, K.G. (ed.). Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 2-1–2-37 (2003)Google Scholar
  42. Pendyala, R.M., Goulias, K.G.: Time use and activity perspectives in travel behavior research. Transportation 29(1), 1–4 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosholm, M.: An analysis of labour market exclusion and (Re-) inclusion. Transitions in the Labour Market. Discussion Paper 332, I2A, Bonn (2001)Google Scholar
  44. Sam, A., Ronald, S.W.: The duration of homelessness: evidence from a national survey. J. Hous. Econ. 12(4), 273–390 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SAS Institute Inc.: SAS Online Documentation Version 9.1.3. http://support.sas.com/onlinedoc/913/docMainpage.jsp (2002). Last Accessed 6 Oct 2006
  46. Stefano, M.: Urban environment and travel times to work. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 30(2), 187–203 (2003)Google Scholar
  47. Tammie, X., Malpezzi, S.: Household mobility in New York City’s regulated rental housing market Simmons-Mosley. J. Hous. Econ. 15(1), 38–62 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xie, Y., Giles, E.D.: A survival analysis of the approval of U.S. Patent Applications Department of Economics, University of Victoria, Econometrics, Working Papers (2007)Google Scholar
  49. Yamamoto, T., Madre, J., Kitamura, R.: An analysis of the effects of french vehicle inspection program and grant for scrappage in household vehicle transaction. Transp. Res. Part B 389(10), 905–926 (2004)Google Scholar
  50. Zhang, M.: The role of land use in travel mode choice. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 70(3), 344–360 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringCity College of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations