What is responsible for the response lag of a significant change in discretionary time use: the built environment, family and social obligations, temporal constraints, or a psychological delay factor?
In this paper, we used the 10-wave Puget Sound Panel Dataset to investigate the response lag of a significant change in discretionary time use. In particular, we want to quantify the relative magnitude of the following factors: the built environment, family and social obligations, temporal constraints, or a psychological delay factor (people delay a behavioral change until the next life shock). To answer this question, we developed a survival model to treat (1) left-censoring, (2) partial observation, and (3) multi-type exits. The results suggest that family and social obligations, as well as temporal constraints, appear to play a more important role than the built environment. Support for the psychological delay factor is not evident. We also found that the probability of having a significant change in discretionary time use is negatively related to time progression, supporting the human adaptivity hypothesis.
KeywordsResponse lag Discretionary time use left-censoring Partial observation Competing risk survival analysis
The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to Mr. Neil Kilgren and other staff members at the Puget Sound Regional Council who relentlessly helped us obtain various datasets and answered our numerous questions during the long course of this study. We also want to thank Fred Mannering, Ryuichi Kitamura and four anonymous reviewers for their comments. Any remaining errors are the authors’ responsibility.
- Amemiya, T.: A note on left censoring. In: Hsiao, C., Pesaran, M.H., Lahiri, K., Lee, L.-F. (eds.) Analysis of Panels and Limited Dependent Variable Models, pp. 7–22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
- Chen, C., Garling, T., Kitamura, R.: Activity rescheduling: deliberate or habitual? Transp. Res. Part F 7(6), 351–371 (2004)Google Scholar
- Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.W., Tversky, A.: Mathematical Psychology, An Elementary Introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1970)Google Scholar
- Diamond, P., Hausman, J.: The retirement and unemployment behavior of older men. In Aaron, H., Burtless G. (eds.) Retirement and Economic Behavior. Brookings Institute, Washington DC, pp. 97–134 (1984)Google Scholar
- Gilbert, C.: A duration model of automobile ownership. Transp. Res. Part B 26(2), 222–242 (1992)Google Scholar
- Golob, T.F.: The Dynamics of Household Travel Time Expenditures and Car Ownership Decisions. The University of California Transportation Center, (1990)Google Scholar
- Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2003)Google Scholar
- Hagerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? Reg. Sci. Assoc. 24, 7–21 (1970)Google Scholar
- Hanaki, N.: Individual and social learning. Comput. Econ. 26(3–4), 213–232 (2005)Google Scholar
- Hensher, D., Johnson, L.: Application of Multinomial Probit to a Time Series of Cross-sections Data Set. Conference on Disaggregate Travel Demand Models, Leeds University (1980)Google Scholar
- Joly, I.: Stability or regularity of the daily travel time in lyon? Application of a duration model. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 33(3), 369–400 (2006)Google Scholar
- Kitamura, R.: Time use: Workshop Report. In Mahmassani, H.S. (ed.) In Perpetual Motion – Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges. Elsevier Science, Limited, Oxford, UK, pp. 333–338 (2002)Google Scholar
- Krizek, K.: Residential relocation and changes in urban travel. APA J. 69(3), 265–281 (2003)Google Scholar
- Pas, E.I.: Recent advances in activity-based travel demand modeling. In Texas Transportation Institute (eds.) Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, June 2–5, 1996 Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers. Travel Model Improvement Program, U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., pp. 79–102 (1996)Google Scholar
- Pendyala, R.: Time use and travel behavior in space and time (Chapter 2). In: Goulias, K.G. (ed.). Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 2-1–2-37 (2003)Google Scholar
- Rosholm, M.: An analysis of labour market exclusion and (Re-) inclusion. Transitions in the Labour Market. Discussion Paper 332, I2A, Bonn (2001)Google Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc.: SAS Online Documentation Version 9.1.3. http://support.sas.com/onlinedoc/913/docMainpage.jsp (2002). Last Accessed 6 Oct 2006
- Stefano, M.: Urban environment and travel times to work. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 30(2), 187–203 (2003)Google Scholar
- Xie, Y., Giles, E.D.: A survival analysis of the approval of U.S. Patent Applications Department of Economics, University of Victoria, Econometrics, Working Papers (2007)Google Scholar
- Yamamoto, T., Madre, J., Kitamura, R.: An analysis of the effects of french vehicle inspection program and grant for scrappage in household vehicle transaction. Transp. Res. Part B 389(10), 905–926 (2004)Google Scholar