Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 143–160 | Cite as

Fatigue in long-duration travel diaries

  • K. W. Axhausen
  • M. Löchl
  • R. Schlich
  • T. Buhl
  • P. Widmer
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

This paper introduces a new long-duration travel diary survey undertaken in a small town and rural environment, which complements the existing urban Mobidrive survey of 1999. Policy-making is dominated by the 1-day view of the world provided by the usual diaries. Long-duration surveys can balance this by highlighting the strong intrapersonal variance in choices, modes used and other aspects of travel behaviour. They also allow us to gain an understanding of the activity space of the travellers. The new 2003 Thurgau data followed the protocol of the earlier study, but developed the set of questions further. These new questions concerned the social context of respondents as well as trip-related items, such as planning horizon of the activity, previous frequency of visits or the groups involved in the trip or activity. The descriptive and model-based analysis of the data showed that respondent fatigue is not an issue in either survey. Where significant deviations from a steady number of reported trips were found, they showed positive tendencies, i.e. learning. The skill accrued in the intensive round of contacts between respondent and interviewer is significant. Papers on travel diaries tend not to report interviewer effects, although their impacts are clearly discernable. The analysis shows that the four interviewers employed in this survey had a substantial effect on the number of reported trips.

Keywords

Fatigue Mobidrive Switzerland Thurgau Travel behaviour 6-Week travel diary 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a grant of the Swiss Department for Environment, Transport, Energy and Telecommunications, and was administered and initiated by the Swiss Association of Transport Engineers (SVI). This and the support and suggestions of the Advisory Group chaired by Dr. G. Abay are gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful for the careful comments of the anonymous referees.

References

  1. Axhausen, K.W.: Social networks and travel: some hypotheses. In: Donaghy, K., Poppelreuter, S., Rudinger, G. (eds.) Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives. pp. 90–108, Ashgate, Aldershot (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Axhausen, K.W.: Social factors in future travel: A qualitative assessment, IEE Proceedings Intelligent Transport Systems (2006, in press)Google Scholar
  3. Axhausen, K.W., Beige S., Martinovits, A.: Vertiefte Auswertungen zur langfristigen räumlichen Mobilität, Forschungsprogramm UNIVOX 2003 Teil I G Verkehr, Vertiefungsbericht, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, 238, Institut für Verkehrsplanung und Transportsysteme (IVT), ETH Zürich, Zürich (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Axhausen, K.W., König, A., Abay, G., Bates, J.J., Bierlaire, M.: Swiss value of travel time savings, paper presented at the 2004 European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, October 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. Axhausen, K.W., Zimmermann, A., Schönfelder, S., Rindsfüser, G., Haupt, T.: Observing the rhythms of daily life: a six-week travel diary. Transportation 29, 95–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat, C.R., Srinivasan, S., Axhausen, K.W.: An analysis of multiple interactivity durations using a unifying multivariate hazard model, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, 191, Institut für Verkehrsplanung und Transportsysteme (IVT), ETH Zürich, Zürich (2003)Google Scholar
  7. Bhat, C.R., Frusti, T., Zhao, H., Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Intershopping duration: An analysis using multi-week data. Transport. Res. 38B, 39–60 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen, L.: Busy people are hard to reach, paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Travel Survey Methods, Costa Rica, August 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. Cirillo, C., Koppelman, F., Axhausen, K.W.: Modelling activity travel scheduling for workers, paper presented at the Workshop Activity-based Analysis, Maastricht, May 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Cirillo, C., Axhausen, K.W. Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary, Transport. Res. A 40A:444–457 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Dillman, D.A.: Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  12. Dillman, D.A.: Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  13. Doherty, S.T., Miller, E.J.: A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation 27 75–97 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Golob, T.F., Meurs, H.J.: Biases in response over time in a seven-day travel diary. Transportation 13 163–181 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groves, R.M.: Survey Errors and Survey Costs. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joh, C.H.: Measuring and predicting adaptation in multidimensional activity-travel patterns, bouwstenen faculteit bouwkunde, vol. 79, PhD thesis, Technical University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2004)Google Scholar
  17. Joh, C.H., Arentze, T.A., Hofman, F., Timmermans, H.J.P.: Activity pattern similarity: a multidimensional alignment method. Transportation Research B 36:385–403 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitamura, R., Bovy, P.H.L.: Analysis of attrition biases and trip reporting errors for panel data. Transport. Res. 21A:287–302 (1987)Google Scholar
  19. König, A.: Bewertung der Verlässlichkeit: Experiment mit Schweizer Befragten. PhD thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich (2004)Google Scholar
  20. Li, H., Guensler, R., Ogle, J., Wang, Jun.: Using GPS data to understand day-to-day dynamics of morning commute behaviour, paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Record, Washington, DC, January 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. Löchl, M., Schönfelder, S., Schlich, R., Buhl, T., Widmer, P., Axhausen, K.W.: Untersuchung der Stabilität des Verkehrsverhaltens, final report for SVI 2001/514, Schriftenreihe, vol. 1120, Bundesamt für Strassen, UVEK, Bern (2005)Google Scholar
  22. Machguth, H., Löchl, M.: Geokodierung 6-Wochenbefragung Thurgau 2003, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, vol. 219, IVT, ETH Zürich, Zürich (2004)Google Scholar
  23. Machguth, M., Löchl, M., Bürgle, M.: Berechnung von Routen- und Verkehrsmittelalternativen für den Datensatz Thurgau 2003, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, vol. 231, IVT, ETH Zürich, Zürich (2004)Google Scholar
  24. Madre, J.-L., Axhausen, K.W., Brög W.: Immobility in travel diary surveys, Transportation (2006, in␣press)Google Scholar
  25. Nielsen, O.A., Jovicic, G.: The AKTA road pricing experiment in Copenhagen, paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, August 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. Schlich, R.: Verhaltenshomogene Gruppen in Längsschnitterhebungen, PhD thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich (2004)Google Scholar
  27. Schlich, R., Axhausen, K.W.: Habitual travel behaviour – evidence from a six week travel diary. Transportation 30, 13–36 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlich, R., Simma, A., Axhausen, K.W.: Determinanten des Freizeitverkehrs: Modellierung und empirische Befunde, Forschungsauftrag SVI 2000/443, Schriftenreihe, vol. 1071, Bundesamt für Strassen, UVEK, Bern (2003)Google Scholar
  29. Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: On the variability of human activity spaces. In M. Koll-Schretzenmayr, M. Keiner and G. Nussbaumer (eds.) The Real and Virtual Worlds of Spatial Planning, pp. 237–262, Springer, Heidelberg (2003a)Google Scholar
  30. Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion?. Transport. Policy 10, 273–286 (2003b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Periodizität im Verkehrsverhalten: Erste Ergebnisse mit Überlebenszeitmodellen. Stadt Region Land 69, 131–144 (2000)Google Scholar
  32. Vägverket: ISA Intelligent Speed Adaptation, Vägverket, unpublished, Vägverket, Borlänge (2000)Google Scholar
  33. Van Wissen, L.J.G., Meurs, H.J.: The Dutch mobility panel: experiences and evaluation. Transportation 16, 99 – 119 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolf, J.: Using GPS Data Loggers to Replace Travel Diaries in the Collection of Travel Data, PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Atlanta (2000)Google Scholar
  35. Zumkeller, D.: Das Mobilität Panel (MOP): Eine neue aktuelle Datenbasis für integrierte Verkehrsplanung, IVF – Report, vol. 99–1, IfV, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. W. Axhausen
    • 1
  • M. Löchl
    • 1
  • R. Schlich
    • 2
  • T. Buhl
    • 3
  • P. Widmer
    • 3
  1. 1.IVT, ETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.SBBBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Büro WidmerFrauenfeldSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations