Policy changes owe its allegiance to both transactional and transformational styles of leadership of policy entrepreneurs; putting a question, which style brings better result. To do so, overall policy changes in India during NDA rule of 2014–2019 was taken into study scope, focusing only on political policy entrepreneurs. Multiple stream framework was used in this study. The qualitative data helped in designing the questionnaire, which consequently got filled by 158 respondents. The results established the positive and significant relationship of both the styles with policy changes. However, the transformational leadership behavior is more preferable to transactional in influencing policy changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ahearne, J. (2006). Notes from a French perspective. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), 1–15.
Aukes, E., Lulofs, K., & Bressers, H. (2018). Framing mechanisms: The interpretive policy entrepreneur’s toolbox. Critical Policy Studies, 12(4), 406–427.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 199–218.
Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951–968.
Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (2017). Contextualizing the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change. Policy and Society, 36(4), 465–478.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13(3), 26–40.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of the multiple streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), 221–227.
Birkland, Thomas A., & Schwaeble, Kathryn L. (2019). Agenda setting and the policy process: Focusing events. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.165.
Brasil, F. G., & Capella, A. C. N. (2017). Translating ideas into action: Brazilian studies of the role of the policy entrepreneur in the public policy process. Policy and Society, 36(4), 504–522.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: HarperCollins.
Cairney, P. (2018). Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 199–215.
Chow, A. (2014). Understanding policy change: Multiple streams and national education curriculum policy in Hong Kong. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(2), 49–64.
Christopoulos, D. C. (2006). Relational attributes of political entrepreneurs: A network perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), 757–778.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.
Crowley, J. E. (2003). The politics of child support in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dionne, S., Yammarino, F., Atwater, L., & Spangler, W. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 177–193.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Fuchs, D. (2017). Windows of opportunity for whom? Commissioners, access and the balance of interest in European environmental governance. Social Sciences, 6(3), 1–14.
Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 121–134.
Green, J. F. (2017). Policy entrepreneurship in climate governance: Toward a comparative approach. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1471–1482.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in international advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. In S. Okazaki (Ed.), Handbook of research in international advertising (pp. 252–276). London: Edward Elgar.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
van Herk, S., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., & Rijke, J. (2011). Learning and action alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: A new framework from empirical evidence from The Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(5), 543–554.
House, R. J., Wright, N. S., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives in international industrial organizational psychology (pp. 535–625). San Francisco, CA: New Lexington.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under-parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
John, P. (2006). Explaining policy change: The impact of the media, public opinion and political violence on urban budgets in England. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1053–1068.
Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Raney, H. L., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 13–36.
Jung, D. I., Bass, B. M., & Sosik, J. J. (1995). Bridging leadership and culture: A theoretical consideration of transformational leadership and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2(4), 3–18.
Kingdon, John W. (1984, 1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (1st and 2nd eds.). New York: Harper Collins.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Lewis, J. M. (2006). Being around and knowing the players: Networks of influence in health policy. Social Science & Medicine, 62(9), 2125–2136.
Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2001). Antecedents of organizational commitment and the mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(8), 594–613.
Maltby, T. (2013). European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism. Energy Policy, 55, 435–444.
Manor, J., & Duckett, J. (2017). The significance of political leaders for social policy expansion in Brazil, China, India and South Africa. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 55(3), 303–327.
Maor, M. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs in policy valuation processes: The case of the coalition for environmentally responsible economies. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1401–1417.
McBeth, M., Jones, M., & Shanahan, E. (2014). The narrative policy framework. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 225–266). Chicago, IL: Westview Press.
Meijerink, S. & Huitema, D. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs and change strategies: Lessons from sixteen case studies of water transitions around the globe. Ecology and Society, 15(2), Art 21.
Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1362–1377.
Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
Netemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S. (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 148–157.
Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Othman, J., Lawrence, J., & Mohammed, K. A. (2012). Review of factors that influence leadership styles among top management in small and medium size enterprises. International Business Management, 6(3), 384–389.
Owens, S. (2010). Learning across levels of governance: Expert advice and the adoption of carbon dioxide emissions reduction targets in the UK. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 394–401.
Raines, S. S., & Prakash, A. (2005). Leadership matters: Policy entrepreneurship in corporate environmental policy making. Administration and Society, 37(1), 3–22.
Rawat, P., & Morris, J. C. (2016). Kingdon’s “streams” model at thirty: Still relevant in the 21st century? Politics & Policy, 44(4), 608–638.
Ringle, C. M., de Souza Bido, D., & da Silva, D. (2014). Structural equation modelling with the smartpls. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 56–73.
Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 147–175.
Schneider, A., Ingram, H., & deLeon, P. (2014). Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 105–150). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schuhrer, S. (2018). Identifying policy entrepreneurs of public sector accounting agenda setting in Australia. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31(4), 1067–1097.
Shearer, J. C. (2015). Policy entrepreneurs and structural influence in integrated community case management policymaking in Burkina Faso. Health Policy and Planning, 30, ii46–ii53.
Simanjuntak, I., Frantzeskaki, N., Enserink, B., & Ravesteijn, W. (2012). Evaluating Jakarta’s flood defence governance: The impact of political and institutional reforms. Water Policy, 14(4), 561–580.
Stefes, C. H. (2010). Bypassing Germany’s reforms tau: The remarkable rise of renewable energy. German Politics, 19(2), 148–163.
Svensson, P. (2019). Formalized policy entrepreneurship as a governance tool for policy integration. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(14), 1212–1221.
Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) techniques using smartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1–32.
Zahariadis, N. (2007). The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 65–92). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Zikmund, W. G. (1994). Business research methods (4th ed.). New York: The Dryden Press.
Zohlnhöfer, R. (2009). How politics matter when policies change: Understanding policy change as a political problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 97–115.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, S.S. Leadership of Political Policy Entrepreneurs: a Comparison of Transactional and Transformational Styles. Public Organiz Rev (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00508-6
- Policy entrepreneurs
- Policy changes