Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defining Governance in Latin America

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory research aims to propose a conceptual definition of governance and to speculate on the state of governance in Latin America. Political instability, corruption, government trust, the rule of law, and nascent democracy complicate the definition and practice of governance in the region. Nevertheless, this papers offered a working definition. Such definition applies variously across countries-- some cases show disheartening results, others seem promising. Common to all countries is that governance is not sufficiently collaborative and innovative in designing democratically responsible solutions to complex twenty-first-century problems because it still depends on highly hierarchical structures and it is rule driven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Colombia’s historical struggle with terrorism affects its citizens’ perception of political stability.

  2. Given Cuba’s unique political system, it would be invalid to compare it to other Latin American countries. Thus, Cuba is not included in this study.

References

  • Andersson, K., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2007). From local strongman to facilitator: Institutional incentives for participatory municipal governance in latin america. Comparative Political Studies, 40(9), 1085–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006288977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armand, Y. (1989). Democracy in Haiti: The legacy of anti-democratic political and social traditions. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 2(4), 537–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biekart, K. (2014). Assessing the 'Arrival of Democracy' in Central America. Revista Europea De Estudios Latinoamericanos Y Del Caribe / European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 96, 117–126 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23722441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, S. R. (2013). Corruption in Latin America: Understanding the perception–exposure gap. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 4(3), 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (2009). Liberal democracy series I, 1972–1988: Definition, measurement, and trajectories. Electoral Studies, 28(3), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustikova, L., & Corduneanu-Huci, C. (2017). Patronage, trust, and state capacity: The historical trajectories of clientelism. World Politics, 69(2), 277–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T., Denemark, D., and Bowler, S. (2011). Trust in government: The United States in comparative perspective. In The Elements of Social Scientific Thinking by K Hoover and T Donovan. Boston: Wadsworth.

  • Espinal, R., Hartlyn, J., & Jana, M. K. (2006). Performance still matters: Explaining trust in government in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005281933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (Ed.). (2004). Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound governance: Engaging citizens through collaborative organizations. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0186-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2017). Governance reforms: The good, the bad, and the ugly; and the sound: Examining the past and exploring the future of public organizations. Public Organization Review, 17(4), 595–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0398-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foweraker, J., & Krznaric, R. (2002). The uneven performance of third wave democracies: Electoral politics and the imperfect rule of law in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 44(3), 29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. (2015). The public administration theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M., & Whelan, A. (2015). Reproduction and the rule of law in Latin America. Fordham Law Review, 83(5), 2577–2604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, F., & Mainwaring, S. P. (2005). The third wave of democratization in Latin America: Advances and setbacks. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won't work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crises. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). Governance matters VII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4654.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2007). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00549.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. R. (2008). Latin America: Eight lessons for governance. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (2010). Democratic governance in Latin America. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., Scully, T., & Vargas-Cullell, J. (2010). Managing success in democratic governance. In S. Mainwaring & S. Scully (Eds.), Democratic governance in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moises, J. A. (2006). Citizens evaluation of democratic institution and the quality of democracy in Brazil. Conference paper, Session: Latin American Cluster of Neglected Issues. Retrieved http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_5178.pdf

  • Nogales, M.T., & Zelaya-Fenner, S. (2013). Democratic Governance in Latin America: A regional discussion. Unpublished paper by the International Republican Institute, Washington, DC.

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, F., & Philip, G. (2005). Second generation reform in Latin America: Reforming the public sector in Uruguay and México. Journal of Latin American Studies, 37(4), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X0500982X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., and Pierre, J. (eds.) (2007). Public Administration and Public Sector Reform In Latin America. In Handbook of Public Administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Robichau, R. W. (2011). The mosaic of governance: Creating a picture with definitions, theories, and debates. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_8.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A., and Cheema, G. S. (2003). Partnering For Development: Government-private sector cooperation in service provision. In Reinventing government for the twenty-first century: State capacity in a globalizing Society. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.

  • Santiso, C. (2001). Improving the odds: Institutional innovation and governance reform in Latin America. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 71, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiso, C. (2015). Governing to deliver: Three keys for reinventing government in Latin America and the Caribbean. Governance, 28(2), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo, L., Martin, N., Estache, A., & Campos, J. (2002). Macroeconomic effects of private sector participation in Latin America’s infrastructure. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2906.

  • Zurbriggen, C. (2014). Governance: A Latin America perspective. Policy and Society, 33(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Rodriguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodriguez, A. Defining Governance in Latin America. Public Organiz Rev 19, 5–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0427-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0427-5

Keywords

Navigation