Public Organization Review

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 95–115 | Cite as

An Examination of Public Private Academic Partnerships: Does Program Success Enhance University Performance Outcomes?

  • Gregory B. Murphy
  • Neil Tocher
  • Bryant Ward


In response to a steady decline in State funding, universities have become heavily involved in a variety of public private academic partnerships (PPAPs) in such areas as medical research, business incubation, technological commercialization, continuing professional education, and intercollegiate athletics. Despite this trend, research which examines if such partnerships actually enhance university funding is rare within the public organization literature. Given this, we focus on university intercollegiate athletics programs, which represent one of the largest PPAPs ever undertaken by universities, to examine whether PPAP success can potentially enhance university performance outcomes leading to increased funding levels. Such programs represent a PPAP because public, private, and academic entities all come together to form an organization (division 1 football at the bowl subdivision level) which seeks to benefit all three entities through sharing resources and responsibilities. Study results showed that athletic success positively influenced a variety of university performance outcome variables such as enrollments and endowments. While results indicate that PPAP success can enhance university funding, we also suggest modifications that should enhance the chances that PPAPs will be successful.


Public private academic partnerships (PPAPs) Program success University outcomes Performance 


  1. Anderson, K. S., & Birrer, G. E. (2011). Creating a sustainable competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis of the Gonzaga University men’s basketball program. Journal of Sport Administration & Supervision, 3(1), 10–21.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, T., Michael, E., & Peirce, J. (2012). Innovative approaches for managing public-private academic partnerships in big science and engineering. Public Organization Review, 12(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, S. (2012). College football assistants seeing salaries surge. USA Today,
  4. Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackmore, J. (2001). Universities in crises? knowledge economies, emanicipatory pedagogies, and the critical intellectual. Educational Theory, 51(3), 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20, 447–493.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, N. D., Rogers, T. M., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Evidence of television exposure effects in AP top 25 college football rankings. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(4), 425–434.Google Scholar
  8. Chaganti, R., DeCarolis, D., & Deeds, D. (1995). Predictors of capital structure in small ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 7–18.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, C., Whisenant, W., & Walsh, P. (2011). The relationship between sustained success and donations for an athletic department with a premier football program. Public Organization Review, 11(3), 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coxhead, F., Grauberg, J., Joyce, P., Knox, C., Lawes, T., & Massey, A. (2010). New development: adapting university education for changing expectations of public services leaders and managers-guidance for designing and delivering MPAs. Public Money & Management, 30(3), 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Clercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2009a). Toward a practice perspective of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial legitimacy as habitus. International Small Business Journal, 27(4), 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Clercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2009b). The role of cultural and symbolic capital in entrepreneurs’ ability to meet expectations about conformity and innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 398–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 877–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engwall, L. (2007). Universities, the state and the market: changing patterns of university governance in Sweden and beyond. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(3), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ertug, G., & Castellucci, F. (2013). Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, B. (2009). Athletic success and institutional rankings. New Directions for Higher Education, 148, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrett, R. (2003). Mapping the education industry: public companies and international higher education (pp. 9–10). Boston: Boston College Centre for International Higher Education.Google Scholar
  18. Gerdy, J. R. (2006). Air ball: American education’s failed experiment with elite athletics. Oxford: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  19. Goff, B. (2000). Effects of university athletics on the university: a review and extension of empirical assessment. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 85–104.Google Scholar
  20. Goff, B. (2004). Effects of university athletics on the university: A review and extension of empirical assessment. economics of college sports. In J. Fizel & R. Fort (Eds.), Studies in sports economics (pp. 65–85). Westport: Greenwood, Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Goidel, R. K., & Hamilton, J. M. (2006). Strengthening higher education through gridiron success? public perceptions of the impact of national football championships on academic quality. Social Science Quarterly, 87(4), 851–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heller, D. E. (1999). The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrollment. The Review of Higher Education, 23(1), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hicks, S. (2010). Analysis of the cash flow of United Kingdom universities. Public Money & Management, 30(4), 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holt, R., & Macpherson, A. (2010). Sensemaking, rhetoric and the socially competent entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal, 28(1), 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Humphreys, B. R., & Mondello, M. (2007). Intercollegiate athletic success and donations at NCAA Division I institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21(2), 265–280.Google Scholar
  26. Khaire, M. (2010). Young and no money? never mind: the material impact of social resources on new venture growth. Organization Science, 21(1), 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmann, M., Christensen, P., & Hansen, J. (2006). Public-private partnerships and the role of Universities in ‘Sustainable Development’. Paper presented at the Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities Conference 2006, 26–30 June 2006.Google Scholar
  28. Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Domingues, M. (2009). Which factors are important to attract students for undergraduate administration courses? The FedUni Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 84–102.Google Scholar
  29. Mainardes, E., Raposo, M., & Alves, H. (2014). Universities need a market orientation to attract non-traditional stakeholders as new financing sources. Public Organization Review, 14(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mixon, F. G., Trevino, L. T., & Minto, T. L. (2004). Touchdowns and test scores: exploring the relationship between athletics and academics. Applied Economics Letters, 11(7), 421–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perez, S. J. (2012). Does intercollegiate athletics draw local students to a university? Journal of Sports Economics, 13(2), 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 458–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pope, D. G., & Pope, J. C. (2009). The impact of college sports success on the quantity and quality of student applications. Southern Economic Journal, 75, 750–780.Google Scholar
  34. Rhoads, T., & Gerking, S. (2000). Educational contributions, academic quality, and athletic success. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(2), 248–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: the social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy, D., Graeff, T., & Harmon, S. (2008). Repositioning a university through NCAA Division 1-A football membership. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 11–29.Google Scholar
  37. Rutherford, M. W., Buller, P. F., & Stebbins, M. (2009). Ethical considerations of the legitimacy lie. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(4), 949–964.Google Scholar
  38. Sandy, R., and Sloane, P. (2004). Why do U.S. Colleges have sports programs? In J. Fizel and R. Fort (eds.), Economics of College Sports (pp. 87–110). Westport, Connn.Google Scholar
  39. Schrotenboer, B. (2013). Digging into the past of NCAA President Mark Emmert. USA Today, April 3, 2013.
  40. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.Google Scholar
  41. Siegfried, J. J., & Burba, M. G. (2004). The college football association television broadcast cartel. Antitrust Bulletin, 49(3), 799–819.Google Scholar
  42. Slantcheva, S., & Levy, D. (2007). Private higher education in post-communist Europe: in search of legitimacy. In S. Slantcheva & D. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education in post-communist Europe (pp. 1–23). New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Southall, R. M., Nagel, M. S., Amis, J. M., & Southall, C. (2008). A method to march madness? institutional logics and the 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association division men’s basketball tournament. Journal of Sport Management, 22(6), 677–700.Google Scholar
  44. Sperber, M. A. (2000). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  45. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  46. Tessema, K. (2009). Consequences of expanding higher education in Ethiopia: massive universities, massive challenges. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Toma, J. D. (2003). Football U.: Spectator sports in the life of the American university. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  48. Toma, J. D., & Cross, M. E. (1998). Intercollegiate athletics and student college choice: exploring the impact of championship seasons on undergraduate applications. Research in Higher Education, 39, 633–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trailer, J., Rechner, P., & Hill, R. A. (2004). Compounded agency problem: an empirical examination of public-private partnerships. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1), 308–315.Google Scholar
  50. Tucker, I. B. (2004). A reexamination of the effect of big-time football and basketball success on graduation rates and alumni giving. Economics of Education Review, 23, 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Washington, M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2004). How organizations change: the role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874–1995. Organization Science, 15(1), 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Washington, M., & Zajak, E. J. (2005). Status evolution and competition: theory & evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  54. Zimbalist, A. (2001). Unpaid professional: Commercialism and conflict in big-time college sports. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations