An Examination of Public Private Academic Partnerships: Does Program Success Enhance University Performance Outcomes?
- 395 Downloads
In response to a steady decline in State funding, universities have become heavily involved in a variety of public private academic partnerships (PPAPs) in such areas as medical research, business incubation, technological commercialization, continuing professional education, and intercollegiate athletics. Despite this trend, research which examines if such partnerships actually enhance university funding is rare within the public organization literature. Given this, we focus on university intercollegiate athletics programs, which represent one of the largest PPAPs ever undertaken by universities, to examine whether PPAP success can potentially enhance university performance outcomes leading to increased funding levels. Such programs represent a PPAP because public, private, and academic entities all come together to form an organization (division 1 football at the bowl subdivision level) which seeks to benefit all three entities through sharing resources and responsibilities. Study results showed that athletic success positively influenced a variety of university performance outcome variables such as enrollments and endowments. While results indicate that PPAP success can enhance university funding, we also suggest modifications that should enhance the chances that PPAPs will be successful.
KeywordsPublic private academic partnerships (PPAPs) Program success University outcomes Performance
- Anderson, K. S., & Birrer, G. E. (2011). Creating a sustainable competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis of the Gonzaga University men’s basketball program. Journal of Sport Administration & Supervision, 3(1), 10–21.Google Scholar
- Berkowitz, S. (2012). College football assistants seeing salaries surge. USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2012/12/18/assistant-coaches-salaries-bowl-subdivision/1777719/.
- Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20, 447–493.Google Scholar
- Campbell, N. D., Rogers, T. M., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Evidence of television exposure effects in AP top 25 college football rankings. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(4), 425–434.Google Scholar
- Chaganti, R., DeCarolis, D., & Deeds, D. (1995). Predictors of capital structure in small ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 7–18.Google Scholar
- Coxhead, F., Grauberg, J., Joyce, P., Knox, C., Lawes, T., & Massey, A. (2010). New development: adapting university education for changing expectations of public services leaders and managers-guidance for designing and delivering MPAs. Public Money & Management, 30(3), 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrett, R. (2003). Mapping the education industry: public companies and international higher education (pp. 9–10). Boston: Boston College Centre for International Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Gerdy, J. R. (2006). Air ball: American education’s failed experiment with elite athletics. Oxford: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
- Goff, B. (2000). Effects of university athletics on the university: a review and extension of empirical assessment. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 85–104.Google Scholar
- Goff, B. (2004). Effects of university athletics on the university: A review and extension of empirical assessment. economics of college sports. In J. Fizel & R. Fort (Eds.), Studies in sports economics (pp. 65–85). Westport: Greenwood, Praeger.Google Scholar
- Humphreys, B. R., & Mondello, M. (2007). Intercollegiate athletic success and donations at NCAA Division I institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21(2), 265–280.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, M., Christensen, P., & Hansen, J. (2006). Public-private partnerships and the role of Universities in ‘Sustainable Development’. Paper presented at the Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities Conference 2006, 26–30 June 2006.Google Scholar
- Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Domingues, M. (2009). Which factors are important to attract students for undergraduate administration courses? The FedUni Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 84–102.Google Scholar
- Pope, D. G., & Pope, J. C. (2009). The impact of college sports success on the quantity and quality of student applications. Southern Economic Journal, 75, 750–780.Google Scholar
- Roy, D., Graeff, T., & Harmon, S. (2008). Repositioning a university through NCAA Division 1-A football membership. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 11–29.Google Scholar
- Rutherford, M. W., Buller, P. F., & Stebbins, M. (2009). Ethical considerations of the legitimacy lie. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(4), 949–964.Google Scholar
- Sandy, R., and Sloane, P. (2004). Why do U.S. Colleges have sports programs? In J. Fizel and R. Fort (eds.), Economics of College Sports (pp. 87–110). Westport, Connn.Google Scholar
- Schrotenboer, B. (2013). Digging into the past of NCAA President Mark Emmert. USA Today, April 3, 2013. http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2013/04/02/ncaa-president-emmert-previous-cases-uconn-lsu/2047607/.
- Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.Google Scholar
- Siegfried, J. J., & Burba, M. G. (2004). The college football association television broadcast cartel. Antitrust Bulletin, 49(3), 799–819.Google Scholar
- Southall, R. M., Nagel, M. S., Amis, J. M., & Southall, C. (2008). A method to march madness? institutional logics and the 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association division men’s basketball tournament. Journal of Sport Management, 22(6), 677–700.Google Scholar
- Sperber, M. A. (2000). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
- Toma, J. D. (2003). Football U.: Spectator sports in the life of the American university. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Trailer, J., Rechner, P., & Hill, R. A. (2004). Compounded agency problem: an empirical examination of public-private partnerships. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1), 308–315.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Zimbalist, A. (2001). Unpaid professional: Commercialism and conflict in big-time college sports. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.Google Scholar