Advertisement

Public Organization Review

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 77–94 | Cite as

Modeling Public Management: Current and Future Research

  • Sangyub Ryu
Article

Abstract

Although a significant amount of research has been carried out in the public management field, recent research has failed to investigate all aspects of public management. In 1999, O’Toole and Meier proposed a formal model to encapsulate all aspects of public management. Since then, more than 20 peer-reviewed articles have adopted the O’Toole–Meier model for their analysis. This study investigates the validity and reliability of the model by reviewing those journal articles that adopted the O’Toole–Meier model. After the review, the study suggests future research questions that could further develop our current understanding of public management.

Keywords

Modeling public management O’Toole–Meier model Performance management 

Notes

Acknowledgement

I wish to thank audience members at the 2013 SPSA conference as well as anonymous reviewers for helpfuldiscussion and comments on an earlier version of this paper. I am also grateful to Nigel Rillon for his researchassistance.

This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2014.

References

  1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, S. C. (2008). The impact of public management reforms on student performance in Danish schools. Public Administration, 86, 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole, & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 14–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Municipal performance: does mayoral quality matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Walker, R. M. (2005). Where next? research directions on performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 633–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 529–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, D. B., Vaughn, J. S., & Villalobos, J. D. (2012). Manager-in-Chief Applying Public Management Theory to Examine White House Chief of Staff Performance. Political Research Quarterly, 65(4), 841–854.Google Scholar
  9. Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., Spendolini, M. J., Gordon, J. F., & Porter, L. W. (1980). Organization structure and performance: a critical review. The Academy of Management Review, 5, 49–64.Google Scholar
  10. Fountian, J. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  11. Goerdel, H. T. (2006). Taking initiative: Proactive management and organizational performance in networked environments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graddy, E. A., & Chen, B. (2009). Partner selection and the effectiveness of interorganizational collaborations. In R. O’Leary & L. Bingham (Eds.), The collaborative public manager: new ideas for the twenty-first century (pp. 53–70). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, T. E., & O’Toole, L. J. (2000). Structures for policy implementation: An analysis of national legislation, 1965–1966 and 1993–1994. Administration Society, 31, 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hicklin, A. (2004). Network stability: opportunity or obstacles? Public Organization Review, 4, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hicklin, A., O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2008). Serpents in the sand: managerial networking and nonlinear influences on organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobson, W. S., Palus, C. K., & Bowling, C. J. (2010). A woman’s touch? gendered management and performance in state administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jarimo, T., Salkari, I., & Bollhalter, S. (2006). Partner selection with network interdependencies: An application. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, & M. Ollus (Eds.), Network-centric collaboration and supporting frameworks (pp. 389–406). Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johansen, M. S. (2012). The direct and interactive effects of middle and upper managerial quality on organizational performance. Administration & Society, 44, 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Luton, L. S. (2007). Deconstructing public administration empiricism. Administration & Society, 39, 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynn, L. E. (1987). Managing public policy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  24. Lynn, L. E., Jr., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Why? how? In C. J. Heinrich & L. E. Lynn Jr. (Eds.), Governance and performance: New perspectives. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lynn, L. E., Jr., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Meier, K. J., & Hicklin, A. (2008). Employee turnover and organizational performance: testing a hypothesis from classical public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 573–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2001). Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: a model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2002). Public managemetn and organizational performance: the impact of manaterial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2003). Public management and educational performance: the impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review, 63, 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2007). Modeling public management: empirical analysis of the management-performance Nexus. Public Management Review, 9, 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meier, K. J., O’Toole L. J., Boyne, G. A., and Walker, R. M. (2007). Strategic Management and the Performance of Public Organizations: Testing Venerable Ideas against Recent Theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17, 357–377.Google Scholar
  32. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2008). Management Theory and Occam’s Razor: How Public Organizations Buffer the Environment Administration & Society, 39, 931–958.Google Scholar
  33. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2009a). The proverbs of new public management: lessons from an evidence-based research agenda. The American Review of Public Administration, 39, 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2009b). The Dog that didn’t bark: How public managers handle environmental shocks. Public Administration, 87, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meier, K. J., Doerfler, C., Hawes, D., Hicklin, A. K., & Rocha, R. R. (2006a). The role of management and representation in improving performance of disadvantaged students: an application of Bum Phillips’s “Don Shula Rule”. Review of Policy Research, 23, 1095–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Goerdel, H. T. (2006b). Management activity and program performance: gender as management capital. Public Administration Review, 66, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Hicklin, A. (2010). I’ve seen fire and i’ve seen rain: public management and performance after a natural disaster. Administration & Society, 41, 979–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miles, R., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organization strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structure of organizations: a synthesis of research. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  40. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nicholson-Crotty, S., & O’Toole, L. J. (2004). Testing a model of public management and organizational performance: the case of Law-enforcement agenceis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: implications of structural context. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9, 505–526.Google Scholar
  43. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2003). Plus ça change: public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2004a). Public management in intergovernmental networks: matching strutural and behavioral networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2004b). Desperately seeking Selznick: cooptation and the dark side of public management in networks. Public Administration Review, 64, 681–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2006). Networking in the penumbra: public management, cooptative links, and distributional consequences. International Public Management Journal, 9, 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2009). The human side of public organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 39, 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2011). Public management: organizations, governance, and performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Toole, L. J., Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2005). Managing upward, downward, and outward: networks, hierarchical relationships and performance. Public Management Review, 7, 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ouchi, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1985). Organizational culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Ringquist, E. (2013). Meta-analysis for public management and policy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, S. E. & Bies, A. (2010). Structured to Partner: School District Collaboration with Nonprofit Organizations in Disaster Response. Bush School Working Paper # 615. http://bushdev.tamu.edu/research/workingpapers/srobinson/NonprofitCollab.pdf. Accessed 3 Sep 2014.
  54. Ryu, S. (2014). Networking partner selection and its impact on the perceived success of collaboration. Public Performance and Management Review, 37, 632–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sandfort, J. (1999). The structural impediments to human service collaboration: examining welfare reform at the front lines. Social Service Review, 73, 314–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sargent, S. (2011). Modeling network management: an examination of internal and external strategies. Public Organization Review, 11, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Terry, L. D. (1995). Leadership of public bureaucracies: the administrator as conservator. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Thurner, P. W., & Binder, M. (2012). Formal and real authority of ministerial jurisdictions in semi-open states: the comparative value of administrative inside and outside networking. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 817–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wamsley, G. L., Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agnecies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  63. Wooldridge, J. M. (2006). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason: Thomson/South-Western.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration, College of Social SciencesHankuk University of Foreign StudiesSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations