Advertisement

Public Organization Review

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 219–228 | Cite as

Conclusion: Can We Go Home? Roads Taken, Targets Met, and Lessons Learned on Governance and Organizational Eclecticism in the Public Arena

  • Ali Farazmand
Article

Abstract

Organizational eclecticism has characterized much of policy and administrative choices in public governance in the last three decades. This concluding article addresses this phenomenon and argues that roads have been taken, targets have been met, and many lessons have been learned in organizing and managing public sector governance, as the articles in this Symposium demonstrate. In the process, experiments have been conducted, some with success, while others with failure, leading to a proliferation of eclectic choices, many unsuited for organizational effectiveness but beneficial to powerful interest groups and politicians, all at the expense of alternative organizational choices and broad-based public interests. Three broad theoretical models/periods are examined, the proliferation of public sector organizational eclecticism is analyzed, and options are suggested concerning alternative organizational choices, resulting in the question: can we go home now?

Keywords

Governance Organizational eclecticism Public administration Public management Privatization Public enterprise management Predatory globalization 

References

  1. Arrow, K. (1970). Social choice and individual values. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burkhead, J., & Miner, J. (1971). Public expenditures. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Farazmand, A. (1989). Crisis in the U.S. administrative state. Administration and Society, 21(2), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farazmand, A. (1996). Introduction: The comparative state of public enterprise management. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Public enterprise management: International case studies (pp. 1–30). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  5. Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farazmand, A. (2004). Sound governance in the age of globalization: A conceptual framework. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovation (pp. 1–24). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  7. Farazmand, A. (2007). Globalization and governance: A theoretical analysis. In A. Farazmand & J. Pinkowski (Eds.), Globalization, governance, and public administration. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Farazmand, A. (2009). Bureaucracy, administration, and politics: An introduction. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Bureaucracy and administration (pp. 1–18). New York: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy, democracy, and hypocrisy: a theoretical analysis. Public Organization Review, 10(3), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farazmand, A. (2012). The future of public administration: challenges and opportunities—a critical perspective. Administration and Society, 44(4), 487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farazmand, A. (2013). Grounding a philosophy of public administration: institutionalism professionalism, and contextualism. Paper presented at the 2013 Annual ASPA Conference, New Orleans, 15–19 March.Google Scholar
  12. Farazmand, A. (forthcoming). Institutional theory and public administration. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, T. (1999). The Lexus and the olive tree. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.Google Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of the world and of the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Galbraith, J. K. (2006). Taming predatory capitalism, The Nation. May 4. http://www.thenation.com/doc/2006041/forum/4. Accessed 20 July 2009.
  17. Galbraith, J. K. (2010). Financial and monetary issues as the crisis unfolds (Vol. 12, Summary Report No. 19). New York: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.Google Scholar
  18. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Thousand Oak: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Korten, D. (1995, 2001). When corporations rule the world, 2nd edn. San Francisco: Kohler.Google Scholar
  20. Korten, D. (1998). The post-corporate world: Life after capitalism. West Hartford, Connecticut: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  21. Moe, T. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. E. Chubb & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), Can governments govern? (pp. 267–329). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  22. O Nuallain, C., Thynne, I., & Wettenhall, R. (1996). Public enterprise management: An educational journey. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Public enterprise management: International case studies (pp. 265–288). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  23. O’Connor, J. (1973). The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the international economy. New York: Harper-Business.Google Scholar
  25. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public service. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  26. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of the institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peters, B. G. (2001). The future of governing. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  28. Peters, B. G. (2002). Government reorganization: Theory and practice. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Modern organizations: Theory and practice (pp. 159–180). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  29. Peters, B. G. (2010). Bureaucracy and democracy. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simon, H. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.Google Scholar
  31. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: Free market and the sinking of the global economy. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  32. Waldo, D. (1961). Organization theory: an elephantine problem. Public Administration Review, 21(4), 210–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waldo, D. (1978). Organization theory: revisiting the elephant. Public Administration Review, 38, 589–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waldo, D. (1992). The enterprise of public administration: A summary view. Novato: Chandler & Sharp.Google Scholar
  35. Weber, M (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (trans: Henderson, A.M. & Parsons, T.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wettenhall, R. (1996). Public enterprise management in Australia: A pioneer among developing countries. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Public enterprise management: International case studies (pp. 237–264). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wise, C. (2002). The public service configuration problem: Designing public organizations in a pluralistic public service. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Modern organizations: Theory and practice (pp. 135–158). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations