Advertisement

Public Organization Review

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 93–106 | Cite as

Political Modernisation and Policy Arrangements: A Framework for Understanding Environmental Policy Change

  • Bas Arts
  • Pieter Leroy
  • Jan van Tatenhove
Article

Abstract

Since its emergence in the early seventies, the environmental policy domain has substantially changed in terms of its content, organisation and instrumentation. Hitherto these changes have been studied primarily as strategic responses of the actors involved. This article aims to conceive recent changes in environmental policies in terms of political modernisation on the one hand, and in terms of the renewal of policy arrangements on the other. Political modernisation refers to structural processes of changing interrelations between state, market and civil society, and to new conceptions and practices of governance. Policy arrangements refer to the substance and the organisation of policy domains in terms of policy discourses, coalitions, rules of the game and resources. This analytical framework aims to do justice to policy dynamics caused by both strategic and structural factors. It therefore provides new perspectives on the understanding of recent changes in environmental policy and also proves to be helpful in improving those policies.

Keywords

Civil Society Environmental Policy Policy Process Political Development Policy Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albrow, D. (1996). The global age state and society beyond modernity. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, M.S., & Liefferink, D. (eds.) (1997). European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arts, B., & van der Zouwen, M. (1999). Policy arrangements in nature conservation. The case of the Netherlands in the European context. The 1999 European environment conference environmental policy in Europe: visions for the new nillennium conference proceedings London: ERP Environment, pp 1–10.Google Scholar
  4. Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2000). Environmental policy arrangements: a new concept. In: H. Goverde (ed.) Global and European Polity? Impacts for Organisations and Policies. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 223–238.Google Scholar
  5. Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (eds.) (forthcoming). Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer (accepted for publication in 2006).Google Scholar
  6. Arts, B. et al. (2001). Biologisch groeien?! Een multi-actor analyse van het beleidsarrangement biologische landbouw (2000–2020). Nijmegen: Leerstoelgroep Milieu en Beleid.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization politics tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. Bekkers, V.J.J.M. (1996). Co-productie in het milieubeleid: op zoek naar een nieuwe sturingsconceptie in: Bestuurswetenschappen 1996/3. pp 177–194.Google Scholar
  10. Berger, P., Berger, B., & Kellner, H. (1973). The homeless mind harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  11. Bovens, M. et al. (1995). De verplaatsing van de politiek. Een agenda voor democratische vernieuwing. Amsterdam: Wiardi Beckman Stichting.Google Scholar
  12. De Jong, D. (2000). Nature conservation policy: Transboundary arrangements. In: Tatenhove, J., van Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (eds.) Political Modernisation and the Environment. The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp 97–115.Google Scholar
  13. Dicke, W. (2000). Globalization and the narrative repertoire of contemporary water management. The case of England and Wales. In: H Goverde (ed.) Global and European Polity? Impacts for Organisations and Policies. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Duyvendak, J.W. (1997). Waar blijft de politiek? Essays over paarse politiek maatschappelijk middenveld en sociale cohesie. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  15. Dryzek, J. (1997). The politics of the earth environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Elias, N. (1982). Het civilisatieproces. Utrecht: Aula.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Godfroij, A.J.A. & Nelissen, red N.J.M. (1993). Verschuivingen in de besturing van de samenleving. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
  20. Hajer, M.A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hajer, M.A. (2000). Politiek als vormgeving. Amsterdam: Vossius AUP.Google Scholar
  22. Hannigan, J. (1995). Environmental sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Inglehart, R. (1995). Cultural shift in advanced industrialized society. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jamison, A. (2001). The greening of knowledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  25. Jänicke, M. (1993). Über Ökologische und Politische Modernisierungen. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 2: 159–175.Google Scholar
  26. Kickert, W., Klijn, E., & Koppejan, J. (eds.) (1997). Managing Complex Networks Strategies for the Public Sector. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  27. Kohler-Koch, B., & Eising, R. (eds.) (1999). The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Kooiman, J. (ed.) (1993). Modern Governance: New Government–Society Interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Leroy, P., & Nelissen, N. (1999). Social and political sciences of the environment—three decades of research in the Netherlands. International Books Utrecht.Google Scholar
  30. Leroy, P., & Van Tatenhove, J. 2000a. Political modernization theory and environmental politics. In: Spaargaren, G., Mol, A.P.J., Buttel, F.H. (eds.) Environment and global modernity. London: Sage pp 187–208.Google Scholar
  31. Leroy, P., & van Tatenhove, J.P.M. 2000b. Milieu en participatie: de verschuivende betekenis van een dubbelconcept. In: Driessen, P.P.P.J., & Glasbergen, P. (red) Milieu samenleving en beleid. Den Haag: Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie pp 259–278.Google Scholar
  32. Liefferink, D., Lowe, P., & Mol, T. (eds.) 1993. European Integration and Environmental Policy. London: Belhaven.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, D., Rhodes, R.A.W. (eds.) 1992. Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  34. Mol, A.P.J. 1995. The refinement of production ecological modernization theory and the chemical industry. Utrecht: Van Arkel.Google Scholar
  35. Pestman, P.K. 2001. In het spoor van de Betuweroute Mobilisatie besluitvorming en institutionalisering rond een groot infrastructureel project. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.Google Scholar
  36. Pestman, P., & van Tatenhove, J. 1998. Reflexieve beleidsvoering voor milieu ruimtelijke ordening en infrastructuur-nieuwe initiatieven nader beschouwd Beleidswetenschap 1998/2.Google Scholar
  37. Risse-Kappen, T. (ed.) 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back in Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sabatier, P. 1987. Knowledge policy-oriented learning and policy change. Knowledge: Creation Diffusion Utilisation, 8(4):649–692.Google Scholar
  39. Scharpf, F.W. 1985. Die Politikverflechtungs-Falle: Europäische Integration und deutscher Föderalismus im Vergleich. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 26(4):323–356.Google Scholar
  40. Schuddeboom, J. 1990. Milieubeleid in de praktijk. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.Google Scholar
  41. Smits, J., & Ringeling, A. 1997. Verweven wetenschap—onderzoek van en voor milieubeleid. In: Leroy, P. (red) Verbondenheid en samenhang—10 Essays bij het afscheid van Klaas Bouwer. Nijmegen: vakgroep MNL pp 195–217.Google Scholar
  42. Spaargaren, G. 1997. The ecological modernization of production and consumption essays in environmental sociology. Wageningen: LUW.Google Scholar
  43. Teisman, G. 1995. Complexe besluitvorming: een pluricentrisch perspectief op besluitvorming over ruimtelijke investeringen. Den Haag: Vuga.Google Scholar
  44. van Kersbergen, K., Lieshout, R.H., & Lock, G. (eds.) 1999. Expansion and Fragmentation Internationalization Political Change and the Transformation of the Nation State Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Van Tatenhove, J. 1993. Milieubeleid onder dak? Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
  46. Van Tatenhove, J. 1999. Political modernisation and the institutionalisation of environmental policy. In: Wissenburg, M., Orhan, G., & Collier, U. (eds.) European Discourses on Environmental Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate pp 59–78.Google Scholar
  47. Tatenhove, J., & Hajer, M. 2001. Nieuwe arrangementen en innovatieve sturingsopties in het kustzonebeleid Essay voor het RIKZ/RWS Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  48. Van Tatenhove, J., & Leroy, P. 1995. Beleidsnetwerken: een kritische analyse. Beleidswetenschap, 9(2) 128–145.Google Scholar
  49. Van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (eds.) 2000. Political Modernisation and the Environment. The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  50. Wallace, H., & Wallace, W. (eds.) 1996. Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Waters, M. 1995. Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Wisserhof, J. 2000. Agricultural policy making in the Netherlands: Beyond corporatist policy arrangements. In: van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., Leroy, P. (eds.) Political modernisation and the environment the renewal of environmental policy arrangements. Dordrecht: Kluwer pp 175–198.Google Scholar
  53. Witteveen, W. 2000. De denkbeeldige staat Voorstellingen van democratische vernieuwing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest and Nature Conservation Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations