Public Organization Review

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 55–67 | Cite as

The Quest for Indigenous Administration: Asian Communist, Islamic Revivalist, and Other Models

Original Article


This paper briefly explores instances of administrative indigenization—defined as native patterns neither imposed nor copied from Euro-centric systems—and implications for the study of Comparative Public Administration. China and Iran—as presented in the Comparative Public Administration literature, broadly defined—are suggested as iconoclastic administrative models which are both viable and interesting and in contrast with Western (Northern) models of study and application. Other emerging models—many of them based on grass-roots movements (not to be confused with terrorist movements)—also provide alternatives to the prescriptions of the New Public Management as well as to the conventional secular, “non-political” hierarchies. Comparative Public Administration needs to accommodate such alternatives on a coequal basis.


Comparative Administration indigenous administration Chinese government Iranian government grass-roots movements 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdo, G., and J. Lyons. (2003). Answering Only to God: Faith and Freedom in 21st Century Iran. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamian, E. (1982). Iran Between Two Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, J. (2003). “Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond “Exit” and “Voice”.” World Development 32(3), 447–459.Google Scholar
  4. Adelkah, F. (2004). Being Modern in Iran. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alatas, S. (1993). “On the Indigenization of Academic Discourse.” Alternatives 18, 307–338.Google Scholar
  6. Amuzegar, J. (2003). “Iran’s Crumbling Revolution.” Foreign Affairs 82 (January/February).Google Scholar
  7. Asaf, H. (1985). Islamic Iran, Revolution and Counter-revolution. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  8. Barth, F. (1993). Balinese Worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buchta, W. (2000). Who Rules Iran? Washington D.C.: Washington Institute for Near East Policy.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, J. P. (1993). “China’s Administrative Reforms for a Market Economy.” Public Administration and Development 13, 345–360.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, X. (2002). “Community and Policing Strategies: A Chinese Approach to Crime Control.” Policing and Society 12, 1–13.Google Scholar
  12. Cortell, A., and S. Peterson. (2001). “Limiting the Unintended Consequences of Institutional Change.” Comparative Political Studies 34(7), 768–799.Google Scholar
  13. Dickson, B. (2003). Red Capitalists in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dittmer, L. (2003). “Leadership Change and Chinese Political Development.” China Quarterly 176, 909–922.Google Scholar
  15. Dwivedi, O. P. (1994). Development Administration, from Underdevelopment to Sustainable Development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Economist, February 21, 2004, 45.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, M., and D. Hulme (eds.). (1996). Beyond the Magic Bullet, NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post-Cold War World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  18. ETTELA’AT (Iran), May 31, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, P. (2004). “Development as Institutional Change: The Pitfalls of Monocropping and The Potentials of Deliberation.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38(4), 36–50.Google Scholar
  20. Farazmand, A. (1994). “The New World Order and Global Public Administration.” In R. Khator and J.-C. Garcia-Zamor (eds.), Public Administration in the Global Village. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Farazmand, A. (2001). “Bureaucrcacy, Agrarian Reforms, and Regime Enhancement: The Case of Iran.” In A. Farazmand (ed.), Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, 2nd edition, Revised and Expanded. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 885–900.Google Scholar
  22. Farazmand, A. (2003). “Chaos and Transformation Theories: A Theoretical Analysis with Implications for Organization Theory and Public Management.” Public Organization Review 3(4), 339–372.Google Scholar
  23. Fung, G., and E. Wright. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovation in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Gamer, R. (2003). “Successful Transition to a Market Economy.” In R. Gamer (ed.), Understanding Contemporary China. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  25. He, H. Y. (2001). Dictionary of the Political Thought of the People’s Republic of China. Armonk, NY: M.E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
  26. Henderson, K. (1999). “A Third Sector Alternative: NGOs and Grassroots Initiatives.” In K. Henderson and O. P. Doivedi (eds.), Bureaucracy and the Alternatives in World Perspective. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Herbst, J. (2000). States and Power in Africa, Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hindmoor, A. (1998). “The Importance of Being Trusted: Transaction Costs and Policy Network Theory.” Public Administration 76, 25–43.Google Scholar
  29. Hiro, D. (1985). Iran Under the Ayatollahs. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Horn, M. (1995). The Political Economy of Public Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Huque, A., and R. Yep. (2003). “Globalization and Reunification: Administrative Reforms and the China–Hong Kong Convergence Challenge.” Public Administration Review 63(2), 141–152.Google Scholar
  32. Jaffee, D. (2001). Organization Theory, Tension and Change. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Jreisat, J. (2003). Comparative Public Administration and Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  34. Kreps, D. (1990). Game Theory and Economic Modeling. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lam, T. C., and H. S. Chan. (1995). “Designing China’s Civil Service System: General Principles and Realities.” International Journal of Public Administration 18(8), 1297–1332.Google Scholar
  36. Lansing, J. S. (1991). Priests and Programmers: Technologies of Power in the Engineering Landscape of Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, P., and C. Lo. (2001). Remaking China’s Public Management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  38. Lewis, D. E. (1994). “Nongovernmental Organizations and Caribbean Development.” Annals, AAPSS 533, 125–138.Google Scholar
  39. Manion, M. (1996). “The Electoral System in the Chinese Countryside.” American Political Science Review 90, 736–748.Google Scholar
  40. Mathey, M. (1997). “Self-Help Approaches to the Provision of Housing: The Long Debate and A Few Lessons.” In J. Gugler (ed.), Cities in the Developing World, Issues, Theory and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Menashri, D. (2001). Post-Revolutionary Politics in Iran. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  42. Nelson, P. (1995). The World Bank and Nongovernmental Organizations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Osborne, M. (2004). An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pradervand, P. (1989). Listening to Africa: Developing Africa form the Grassroots. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  45. Rand Corporation. (2003). The People’s Liberation Army as Organization. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
  46. Salamon, L. M. (1994). “The Rise of the Nonprofit Sector.” Foreign Affairs 73.Google Scholar
  47. Salehi, M. M. (1988). Insurgency Through Culture and Religion: The Islamic Revolution in Iran. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  48. Shambaugh, D. (2000). The Modern Chinese State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tsonis, T. (1992). Chaos: From Theory to Applications. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, O. (1993). “An Outsider’s Perspective.” In M. Mills and S. Nagel (eds.), Public Administration in China. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  51. Williamson, J. (1990). “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In J. Williamson (ed.), Latin America’s Adjustment: How Much has Happened? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  52. Wong, J. (2003). “Successful Transition in a Market Economy.” In R. Graves (ed.), Understanding Contemporary China. London: Lynn Riener.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State University College at BuffalloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations