Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 761–784 | Cite as

Repartnering and Childbearing After Divorce: Differences According to Parental Status and Custodial Arrangements

  • Sofie Vanassche
  • Martine Corijn
  • Koen Matthijs
  • Gray Swicegood


We use a stepfamily formation perspective to study two dimensions of the family life course following the dissolution of a first marriage. First, we examine how the presence of children from a prior union and the custody arrangements of those children influence the process of repartnering. In doing so, we extend the traditional explanations of union formation in terms of needs, attractiveness, and opportunities by taking into account the parental status of the new partners and a detailed classification of the custody arrangement of the children. Next, we investigate the likelihood of childbearing within those post-separation unions with a particular emphasis on the prior parental status of both partners. By studying post-separation union formation and fertility behavior together, we get a more complete depiction of stepfamily formation especially in their more complex forms. Our analyses are based on survey data for 2077 divorced men and 2384 divorced women collected in the Divorce in Flanders study. The results show that compared with other divorcees, full-time residential parents are the least likely to start a new union following separation and that parents are more likely to start a union with another parent than with a childless partner. Several of our results suggest that parenthood may not be a particularly attractive status on the partner market. Potential partners without children themselves appear especially reluctant to assume a (residential) step parental role. In contrast with the results for union formation, it is not the custody arrangement of the child(ren) but parental status itself that predicts childbearing within higher order unions. Our findings are important from a policy perspective as they stress the consequences of gender-neutral childrearing patterns following divorce for the repartnering of women after separation.


Post-divorce repartnering Post-divorce childbearing Parental status Childrearing responsibilities Joint custody 


  1. Bastaits, K., Pasteels, I., Ponnet, K., & Mortelmans, D. (2015). Adult non-response bias from a child perspective. Using child reports to estimate father’s non-response. Social Science Research, 49, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaujouan, E. (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age and past fertility. Advances in Life Course Research, 17, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaujouan, E., & Wiles-Portier, E. (2011). Second-union fertility in France: Partners’ age and other factors. Population, 66(2), 239–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bemhardt, E., & Goldscheider, F. K. (2002). Children and union formation in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 18(3), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjarnason, T., & Arnarsson, A. M. (2011). Joint physical custody and communication with parents: A cross-national study of children in 36 western countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(6), 871–890.Google Scholar
  7. Botterman, S., Sodermans, A. K., & Matthijs, K. (2014). The social life of divorced parents. Do custody arrangements make a difference in divorced parents’ social participation and contacts? Leisure Studies.doi: 10.1080/02614367.2014.938768.Google Scholar
  8. Buber, I., & Prskawetz, A. (2000). Fertility in second unions in Austria: Findings from the Austrian FFS. Demographic Research, 3, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bumpass, L., Sweet, J., & Castro Martin, T. (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(3), 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cancian, M., Meyer, D. R., Brown, P. R., & Cook, S. T. (2014). Who gets custody now? Dramatic changes in children’s living arrangements after divorce. Demography, 51(4), 1381–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corijn, M. (2013a). Veranderingen in de burgerlijkestaatdoorheen de levensloop (Changes in the civil status in the life course). In: M. Corijn & C. Van Peer (Eds). Gezinstransities in Vlaanderen (Family transitions in Flanders) (pp. 21–36). Brussel: Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering, SVR-studie 2.Google Scholar
  12. Corijn, M. (2013b). Gezinsvorming en -ontbinding sinds 2000: veranderingen in gedrag en in opvattingen. (Family formation and dissolution; changes in behavior and values). In M. Corijn & C. Van Peer (Eds). Gezinstransities in Vlaanderen (Family transitions in Flanders) (109–134). Brussel: Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering, SVR-studie 2.Google Scholar
  13. Crosbie-Burnett, M. (1989). Impact of custody arrangement and family structure on remarriage. Journal of Divorce, 13(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2003). Alternative routes in the remarriage market: Competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce. Social Forces, 81(4), 1459–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Defever, C. & Mortelmans, D. (2011). De socio-economische positie van vrouwen en mannen na de transities echtscheiding en verweduwing. Een longitudinale studie op de Kruispuntbank Sociale Zekerheid. Steunpunt Gelijkekansenbeleid.Google Scholar
  16. Dykstra, P. A., & Poortman, A. (2010). Economic resources and remaining single: Trends over time. European Sociological Review, 26(3), 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eurostat (2012). Statistics [electronic resource]. Luxembourg: Eurostat. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/introduction.
  18. Fokkema, T. (2001). Forse inkomensdaling voor vrouwen na echtscheiding en vroege verweduwing: Bieden hertrouw en werk uitkomst? Bevolking en Gezin, 30(1), 5–29.Google Scholar
  19. Fokkema, T., & Dykstra, P. A. (2002). Differences in depression between married and divorced women in the Netherlands: In search of an explanation. The Netherlands’ Journal of Social Science Research, 38(1), 24–47.Google Scholar
  20. Goldscheider, F. K., & Sassler, S. (2006). Creating stepfamilies: Integrating children into the Study of Union Formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2), 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffith, J. D., Koo, H. P., & Suchindran, C. M. (1985). Childbearing and family in remarriage. Demography, 22(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gunnoe, M. L., & Braver, S. L. (2001). The effects of joint legal custody on mothers, fathers, and children controlling for factors that predispose a sole maternal versus joint legal award. Law and Human Behavior, 25(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halman, L., Sieben, I., & van Zundert, M. (2011). Atlas of European values. Trends and traditions at the turn of the century. Tilburg: Tilburg University & Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henz, U., & Thomson, E. (2005). Union stability and stepfamily fertility in Austria, Finland, France and West Germany. European Journal of Population, 21, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., & Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European Context. European Journal of Population, 29, 417–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jansen, M., Mortelmans, D., & Snoeckx, L. (2009). Repartnering and (re)employment: strategies to cope with the economic consequences of partnership dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1271–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jefferies, J., Berrington, A., & Diamond, I. (2000). Childbearing following marital dissolution in Britain. European Journal of Population, 16(3), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeynes, W. H. (2006). The impact of parental remarriage on children. Marriageand Family Review, 40(4), 37–41.Google Scholar
  30. Kalmijn, M., & Gelissen, J. (2007). The Impact of recohabitation on fertility: Evidence from life history data in the Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 38(4), 555–573.Google Scholar
  31. Koo, H. P., Suchindran, C. M., & Griffith, J. D. (1984). The effects of children on divorce and re-marriage: A multivariate analysis of life table probabilities. Population Studies, 38(3), 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lampard, R., & Peggs, K. (1999). Repartnering: The relevance of parenthood and gender to cohabitation and remarriage among the formerly married. British Journal of Sociology, 50(3), 443–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meggiolaro, S., & Ongaro, F. (2008). Repartnering after marital dissolution: Does context play a role? Demographic Research, 19(5), 1913–1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meggiolaro, S., & Ongaro, F. (2010). The implications of marital instability for a woman’s fertility: Empirical evidence from Italy. Demographic Research, 23, 963–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mortelmans, D., Pasteels, I., Van Bavel, J., Bracke, P., Matthijs, K. & Van Peer, C. (2011). Divorce in Flanders. Data collection and code book. http://www.divorceinflanders.be.
  36. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing: Assortative mating under varying degrees of uncertainty. American Journal or Sociology, 94(3), 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pasteels, I., Corijn, M., & Mortelmans, D. (2012). Een nieuwe partner na een echtscheiding? Opleidingsverschillen bij mannen en vrouwen in Vlaanderen. TijdschriftvoorSociologie, 33(3–4), 331–352.Google Scholar
  38. Pasteels, I., Mortelmans, D., & Van Bavel, J. (2011). Steekproef en dataverzameling (Sample and data collection). In D. Mortelmans, I. Pasteels, P. Bracke, K. Matthijs, J. Van Bavel, & C. Van Peer (Eds.), Scheiding in Vlaanderen (Divorce in Flanders) (pp. 27–64). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  39. Poortman, A. R. (2007). The first cut is the deepest? The role of the relationship career for union formation. European Sociological Review, 23(5), 585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sassler, S. (2010). Partnering across the life course: Sex, relationships, and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sodermans, A.K. (2013). Parenting apart together. Studies on joint physical custody arrangements in Flanders. KU Leuven: Centre for Sociological Research (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
  42. Sodermans, A. K., Matthijs, K., & Swicegood, G. (2013a). Co-parenting over time: The incidence and characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders. Demographic Research, 28, 821–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sodermans, A. K., Vanassche, S., & Matthijs, K. (2013b). Post-divorce custody arrangements and binuclear family structures of Flemish adolescents. Demographic Research, 28, 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. South, S. J. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(4), 928–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stewart, S. D., Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2003). Union formation among men in the U.S.: Does having prior children matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sweeney, M. (1997). Remarriage of women and men after divorce. The role of socioeconomic prospects. Journal of Family Issues, 18(5), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sweeney, M. (2010). Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Teachman, J. D., & Heckert, A. (1985). The impact of age and children on remarriage: Further evidence. Journal of Family Issues, 6(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vikat, A., Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies, 53(2), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vikat, A., Thomson, E., & Prskawetz, A. (2004). Childrearing responsibility and stepfamily fertility in Finland and Austria. European Journal of Population, 20(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1989). Second chances: Men, women, and children a decade after divorce. New York: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
  52. Wineberg, H. (1990). Childbearing after remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofie Vanassche
    • 1
  • Martine Corijn
    • 2
  • Koen Matthijs
    • 1
  • Gray Swicegood
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Sociological Research (Family and Population Studies)KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Research Center of the Flemish GovernmentBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations