Advertisement

Population and Environment

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 284–303 | Cite as

Demographic change and shifting views about marine resources and the coastal environment in Downeast Maine

  • Thomas G. Safford
  • Lawrence C. Hamilton
Original Paper

Abstract

Connections to the sea often define the character of coastal towns. However, as migrants arrive and economic diversification occurs, views about the use of marine resources and the ocean environment can change. Using survey data from Maine, we examined whether shifting demographics affect public perceptions of marine resource uses and coastal environmental concerns. We tested resource use and environmental items against a common set of demographic, background, and place-related variables. Results indicate that the level of education and the county of residence predict Mainers’ views about different marine resource uses and ocean-related environmental issues. Political party affiliation strongly influences environmental concern but not views about the use of marine resources. Migration history, on the other hand, has little effect. Understanding community contexts as well as individual background and ideological orientations will be critical as managers attempt to balance alternative uses of marine resources and resolve coastal environmental problems.

Keywords

Environmental attitudes Marine resource management Community Maine 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by the Carsey Institute through a grant from the Ford Foundation. The authors would like to thank Megan Henly, Wil Buxton, and Jessica Ulrich for their contributions to this project. The comments and suggestions from the anonymous reviewers also helped greatly improve the final version of this article.

References

  1. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2006). Standard definitions: Final disposition of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (4th ed.). Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, D. M., & Baba, Y. (1990). Social determinants of neighborhood attachment. Sociological Spectrum, 10, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barringer, R. (2010). Changing Maine: 1960–2010. Gardiner, ME: Tillbury House.Google Scholar
  4. Barringer, R., & Davies, R. (2004). Blaine house conference on Maine’s natural-resource-based industry: Charting a new course. Augusta, ME: Maine State Planning Office.Google Scholar
  5. Berenguer, J., Corraliza, J. A., & Martin, R. (2005). Rural–Urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boucquey, N., Campbell, L. M., Cumming, G., Meletis, Z. A., Norwood, C., & Stoll, J. (2010). Interpreting amenities, envisioning the future: Common ground and conflict in North Carolina’s rural coastal communities. Geojournal. doi:  10.1007/s10708-010-9387-1.
  7. Brehm, J. M., Eisenhauer, B. W., & Krannich, R. S. (2006). Community attachments as predictors of local environmental concern: The case for multiple dimensions of attachment. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(2), 142–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cadieux, K. V., & Hurley, P. T. (2009). Amenity migration, exurbia, and emerging rural landscapes: Global natural amenity as place and as process. GeoJournal. doi:  10.1007/s10708-009-9335-0.
  9. Crossett, K. M., Culliton, T. J., Wiley, P. C., & Goodspeed, T. R. (2004). Population trends along the coastal United States: 1980–2008. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Stern, P. (2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment, September/October.Google Scholar
  13. Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10(4), 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Economic Profile Systems (EPS). (2009a). A Socioeconomic profile: Hancock county maine. Bozeman, MT: Bureau of Land Management/Headwater Economics.Google Scholar
  15. Economic Profile Systems (EPS). (2009b). A socioeconomic profile: Washington County Maine. Bozeman, MT: Bureau of Land Management/Headwater Economics.Google Scholar
  16. Ednie, A.J., & Daigle, J. J. (2007). Maine Coastal Island visitor survey2006 Deer Isle/Stonington region. Miscellaneous Report 443, Maine Agricultural Forest Experiment Station: University of Maine. http://www.umaine.edu/mafes/elec_pubs/miscreports/mr436.pdf.
  17. Ednie, A., Daigle, J., & Leahy, J. (2010). The development of recreation place attachment on the maine coast: User characteristics and reasons for visiting. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(1), 36–51.Google Scholar
  18. Fermata Associates. (2005). Strategic plan for implementing the maine nature tourism initiative. Putney, VT: Fermata Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Flynn, J., & Satterfield, T. A. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The ‘white male’ effect. Health, Risk and Society, 2(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freudenburg, W. R. (2007). Rural-urban differences in environmental concern: A closer look. Sociological Inquiry, 61(2), 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gehrels, W. R., Belknap, D. F., Black, S., & Newnham, R. M. (2002). Rapid sea-level rise in the Gulf of Maine, USA, since AD 1800. The Holocene, 12(4), 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gosnell, H., & Abrams, J. (2009). Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal. doi:  10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4.
  23. Hall-Arber, M., Dyer, C., Poggie, J., McNally, J., & Gagne, R. (2001). New England’s fishing communities—MITSG 01–15. Cambridge: MIT Sea Grant Program.Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton, L. C., Colocousis, C. R., & Duncan, C. M. (2010). Place effects on environmental views. Rural Sociology, 75(2), 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamilton, L., Hamilton, L. R., Duncan, C. M., & Colocousis, C. R. (2008). Place matters: Challenges and opportunities in four rural Americas. Durham, NH: The Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  26. Hamilton, L. C., & Keim, B. D. (2009). Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. International Journal of Climatology, 29(15), 2348–2352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hilborn, R. (2007). Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Marine Policy, 31, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hites, R. A., Foran, J. A., Carpenter, D. O., Hamilton, M. C., Knuth, B. A., & Schwager, S. J. (2004). Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science, 303, 226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hunter, L. M., & Brehm, J. M. (2004). A qualitative examination of value orientations toward wildlife and biodiversity by rural residents of the intermountain region. Human Ecology Review, 11(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
  30. Jin, D., Thunberg, E., & Hoagland, P. (2008). Economic impact of the 2005 red tide event on commercial shellfish fisheries in New England. Ocean and Coastal Management, 51(5), 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, K. M., & Cromartie, J. B. (2006). The rural rebound and its aftermath: Changing demographic dynamics and regional contrasts. pp. 25–49. In W. A. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society. Dordrecht: Spring.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology, 57, 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krkošek, M., Lewis, M. A., Morton, A., Frazer, L. N., & Volpe, J. P. (2006). Epizootics of wild fish induced by farm fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(2), 15506–15510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MDEP). (2002). Mercury in maine: A status report prepared for the joint standing committee of the maine legislature having jurisdiction over natural resources. http://www.state.me.us/dep/mercury/reports.htm.
  35. Maine Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS). (2008). Report of the interstate workgroup on evaluating atlantic coastal advisories for recreationally caught striped bass and bluefish based on the PCBs. www.maine.gov/DHHS/eohp/fish/9_08Final.pdf.
  36. Maine Department of Marine Resources (MDMR). (2003). Maine aquaculture review. West Bootbay Harbor, ME: MDMR/Normandeau Associates/Battelle.Google Scholar
  37. Maine Department of Marine Resources (MDMR). (2009a). Historical maine cod landings. http://www.maine.gov/dmr/commercialfishing/historicaldata.htm.
  38. Maine Department of Marine Resources (MDMR). (2009b). Preliminary 20062008 maine landings commercial fishery ex-vessel value by county http://www.maine.gov/dmr/commercialfishing/recentlandings.htm.
  39. Maine State Planning Office (MSPO). (2011). Census state data center. http://www.maine.gov/spo/economics/census/.
  40. Matarrita-Cascante, D., Luloff, A. E., Field, D. R., & Krannich, R. (2006). Community par-ticipation in rapidly growing communities. Community Development: The Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(4), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matarrita-Cascante, D., Stedman, R., & Luloff, A. E. (2010). Permanent and seasonal residents community attachment in natural amenity-rich areas: Exploring the contribution of community and landscape-based factors. Environment and Behavior, 42(2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore, S. (2004). The taunton bay assessment: A report to the maine legislature marine resources committee for consideration of the 2000–2005 dragging prohibition. W. Boothbay Harbor, ME: Department of Marine Resources.Google Scholar
  43. Morrissey, J., & Manning, R. E. (2000). Race, residence, and environmental concern: New Englanders and the white mountain national forest. Human Ecology Review, 7(1), 12–23.Google Scholar
  44. Nelson, P. B. (2001). Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family and class discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Osher, L. J., Leclerc, L., Wiersam, G. B., Hess, C. T., & Guiseppe, V. E. (2006). Heavy metal contamination from historic mining in upland soil and estuarine sediments of Egypt Bay, Maine, USA. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 70, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pinto da Silva, P., & Kitts, A. (2006). Collaborative fisheries management in the Northeast US: Emerging initiatives and future directions. Marine Policy, 30, 832–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reilly, C., & Renski, H. (2007). Place and prosperity. Augusta, ME: Maine State Planning Office.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenberg, A. A., Swasey, J. H., & Bowman, M. (2006). Rebuilding US fisheries: Progress and problems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(6), 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rural Policy Research Institute (RPRI). (2006). Demographic and economic profile: Maine. Columbia, MO: Rural Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  50. Safford, T. G., & Hamilton, L. (2010). Ocean views: Coastal environmental problems as seen by Downeast Maine residents—Policy Brief No. 3. Durham, NH: The Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  51. Sharp, J. S., & Adua, L. (2009). The social bases of agro-environmental concern: Physical versus social proximity. Rural Sociology, 74(1), 56–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Silvert, W., & Sowles, J. W. (1996). Modeling environmental impacts of marine finfish aquaculture. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 12, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, M. D., & Krannich, R. S. (2000). Culture clash revisited: Newcomer and longer term residents’ attitudes towards land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain west. Rural Sociology, 65(3), 396–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, M. B., & Sharp, J. S. (2005). Growth, development, and farming in an Ohio exurban region. Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 565–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Springuel, N., & Clements, S. (Eds.). (2007). A resource guide for tourism in Downeast Maine and Southwest New Brunswick. MSG- E-07–03 400: Augusta, ME: Maine Sea Grant.Google Scholar
  56. Stedman, R. (2006). Understanding place attachment among second homeowners. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stedman, R. C., & Hammer, R. B. (2006). Environmental perception in a rapidly growing, amenity-rich region: The effects of lakeshore development on perceived water quality in Vilas County, Wisconsin. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stern, P. C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Townsend, D. W., Pettigrew, N. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2001). Offshore blooms of red tide dinoflagellate, Alexandrium sp., in the Gulf of Maine. Continental Shelf Research, 21(4), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. US Census Bureau. (2009a). 2006–2008 American community survey 3-year estimates. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  61. US Census Bureau. (2009b). Historical census of housing tables—vacation homes. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  62. US Census Bureau. (2011). 2010 US census. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  63. Vail, D. (2010). Amenity investments & tourist destination development: Policy insights from three maine regions. Augusta, ME: Maine Center for Economic Policy.Google Scholar
  64. Vorkinn, M., & Riese, H. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context: The significance of place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 33, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Winkler, R., Field, D. R., Luloff, A. E., Krannich, R. S., & Williams, T. (2007). Social landscapes of the Inter-Mountain West: A comparison of ‘Old West’ and ‘New West’ communities. Rural Sociology, 72(3), 478–501.Google Scholar
  66. Wolters, W., Masters, A., Vinci, B., & Summerfelt, S. (2009). Design, loading, and water quality in recirculating systems for Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) at the USDA ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center (Franklin, Maine). Aquacultural Engineering, 41, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Woods, M. (2003). Rural geography: Processes, responses, and experiences in rural restructuring. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations