Negative Campaigning in the Social Media Age: Attack Advertising on Facebook
- 4.5k Downloads
Recent studies examine politicians’ decisions to use social media, as well as the content of the messages that these political actors disseminate on social media platforms. We contribute to this literature by examining how race competitiveness and a candidate’s position in the race relative to her opponent affect their decisions to issue attacks. Through content analysis of nearly 15,000 Facebook posts for tone (positive or negative), we find that while competitive races encourage both candidates to issue more negative posts, candidates in less competitive races embrace attack messages with more or less frequency depending on whether they trail or lead their opponent. We find that social media negativity is much more likely to be a desperation strategy employed by underdog candidates in less competitive races. We also run separate models examining the factors that drive policy and personal attacks. While underdog candidates are more likely to engage in issue attacks, candidates in competitive races are significantly more likely to use Facebook to make personal attacks.
KeywordsElections Campaigns Negativity Social Media
We wish to thank Kristin Bender for her excellent research assistance. We also would like to thank Laura Olson, Chris Bonneau, Kris Kanthak, Mac Avery, the editor, and the anonymous reviewers at Political Behavior for their helpful comments and suggestions.
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hale, J. F., Fox, J. C., & Farmer, R. (1996). Negative advertisements in U.S. Senate Campaigns: The influence of campaign context. Social Science Quarterly, 77(2), 329–343.Google Scholar
- Kahn, K. F. (1993). Gender differences in campaign messages: The political advertisements of men and women candidates for U.S. senate. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 481–502.Google Scholar
- Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of US Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (2nd ed.). College Station, Texas: STATA Press.Google Scholar
- Morales, L. (2011). Google and facebook users skew young, affluent, and educated. Retrieved from Washington, DC. http://www.gallup.com/poll/146159/Facebook-Google-Users-Skew-Young-Affluent-Educated.aspx.
- Schattsneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Sigelman, L., & Buell, E. H. (2003). You take the high road and i’ll take the low road? The interplay of attack strategies and tactics in presidential campaigns. The Journal of Politics, 65(2), 518–531.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. (2011). 22% of online Americans used social networking on Twitter for politics in 2010 campaign. Pew Internet.Google Scholar
- Smith, A., & Rainie, L. (2010). 8% of online americans use twitter. Retrieved from Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/12/09/8-of-online-americans-use-twitter/.
- Wagner, K. M., Gainous, J., & Holman, M. R. (2016). I am woman, hear me tweet! gender differences in twitter use among congressional candidates. Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy.Google Scholar