Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 653–675 | Cite as

Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

  • Karen Gift
  • Thomas Gift
Original Paper

Abstract

Do resumes with political “signals” make job applicants more or less likely to get hired? To test our theory that employers are more likely to hire like-minded partisans (and less likely to hire those of opposing partisan bents), we conduct a randomized experiment, sending out 1,200 politically branded resumes in response to help-wanted ads in two U.S. counties—one highly conservative and the other, highly liberal. In our pooled sample, we find that job seekers with minority partisan affiliations are statistically less likely to obtain a callback than candidates without any partisan affiliation. Meanwhile, applicants sharing the majority partisan affiliation are not significantly more likely to receive a callback than non-partisan candidates. These results suggest that individuals may sometimes place themselves at a disadvantage by including partisan cues on their resumes.

Keywords

Employment Hiring Jobs Partisanship Bias Discrimination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Mike Munger for advising us, William Connelly for his help in identifying research assistants, Art Goldsmith for his encouragement and feedback, Christopher DeSante and Timothy Ryan for donating their time to answer our questions, and the anonymous reviewers at Political Behavior for their helpful critiques. We also thank Andrew Bell, Sunshine Hillygus, Daniel Krcmaric, Chris Porter, and Erik Wibbels for their thoughtful support and comments. We are grateful to Greg Franke, Annelise Madison, and Tom Sanford for their research assistance. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2014 Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting and Washington and Lee University’s “Economics of Social Problems” seminar. Thomas Gift acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program and the Duke Program for the Study of Democracy, Institutions, and Political Economy. Project approved under IRB Protocol No: A0725.

Disclosure

Experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abramowitz, Alan I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acquisti, A., & Fong, C. M. (2013). An experiment in hiring discrimination via online social networks. Carnegie Mellon University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A., Bertrand, M., Dattaz, S., & Mullainathan, S. (2009). Labor market discrimination in Delhi: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendick, Marc J., Brown, L. E., & Wall, K. (1999). No foot in the door: An experimental study of employment discrimination against older workers. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 10(4), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blank, R. M., Dabady, M., & Citro, C. F. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring racial discrimination. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carmines, E. G., & Stanley, H. W. (1992). The transformation of the new deal party system: Social groups, partisanship among Northern Whites, 1972–1988. Political Behavior, 14(3), 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cross, H., Kenney, G., Mell, J., & Zimmerman, W. (1989). Differential treatment of hispanic and anglo job seekers: Hiring practices in two cities. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage: How parties organize democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniel, W. W. (1968). Racial discrimination in England. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Dettrey, B. J., & Campbell, J. E. (2013). Has growing income inequality polarized the American electorate? Class, party, and ideological polarization. Social Science Quarterly, 94(4), 1062–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksson, S., & Rooth, D. (2011). Do employers use unemployment as a sorting criterion when hiring? Evidence from a Field Experiment. IZA Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  15. Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, S. J., & Poper, J. C. (2006). Culture war? The myth of polarized America (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  16. Fosse, E., Gross, N., & Ma, J. (2011). Political bias in the graduate admissions process: A field experiment. Harvard University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  17. Galston, W. A., & Nivola, P.S. (2006). The great divide: Polarization in American politics. The American Interest.Google Scholar
  18. Gelman, A., Shor, B., Bafumi, J., & Park, D. (2007). Rich state, poor state, red state, blue state: What’s the matter with Connecticut? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2009). Partisanship and economic behavior: Do partisan differences in economic forecasts predict real economic behavior? American Political Science Review, 103(3), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts & minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haidt, J. (2011, January 27). Lecture at the annual convention of the society for personality and social psychology. Available at http://www.edge.org/conversation/the-bright-future-of-post-partisan-social-psychology.
  22. Heckman, J., & Siegelman, P. (1992). The urban institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix & R. Struyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in america. Urban Institute: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Heckman, J. J. (1998). Detecting discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huffcut, Allen I. (2011). An empirical review of the employment interview construct literature. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, A. S., Orlando, F. J., Sparks, D. B. (2012). Ideological extremity and primary success: A social network approach. Duke University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  27. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kroft, K., Lange, F., & Notowidigdo, M. (2013). Duration dependence and labor market conditions: Evidence from a field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 1123–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Layman, G. (2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflicts in American party politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  32. Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Neumark, D. (2012). Detecting discrimination in audit and correspondence studies. Journal of Human Resources, 47(4), 1128–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neumark, D., Bank, R. J., & Van Nort, K. D. (1996). Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 915–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norton, A. (1988). Reflections on political identity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  36. Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2008). Nonemployment stigma as rational herding: A field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(1), 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 957–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pew Research Center. (June 4, 2012). Trends in American Values: 1987–2012, p. 25. Available at http://www.people-press.org/2012/06/04/partisan-polarization-surges-in-bush-obama-years/.
  39. Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. The Economic Journal, 112(483), 480–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rivera, L. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rothman, S. S., Lichter, R., & Nevitte, N. (2005). Politics and professional advancement among college faculty. The Forum, 3(1), Article 2.Google Scholar
  42. Ruxton, G. D., & Neuhauser, M. (2010). When should we use one-tailed hypothesis testing? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2), 114–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Vol. 2). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Tilcsik, A. (2011). Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117(2), 586–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ward, R. (1969). A note on the testing of discrimination. Race, 11(2), 218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wienk, R. E., Reid, C. E., Simonson, J. C., & Eggers, F. J. (1979). Measuring discrimination in American housing markets: The housing market practices survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  48. Yancey, G. (2011). Compromising scholarship: Religious and political bias in American higher education. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations