Political Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 623–651 | Cite as

The Conditional Effect of Network Diversity and Values on Tolerance

Original Paper


While recent literature reports that network diversity generates tolerance, empirical data suggest that in Israel, a highly diverse country, tolerance has been in scarce supply. The well-documented importance of personal value preferences (specifically, openness to change vs. conservation and self-transcendence vs. self-enhancement) in producing tolerant views leads us to hypothesize that values function as boundary conditions mitigating the impact of network diversity upon both political and social tolerance. Building on a representative survey conducted in Israel in 2011, we show that diversity contributes to tolerance more when people are open-minded; when conservatives encounter dissimilar attitudes, they are either less affected or respond with increased intolerance. Secondly, those who highly regard the opinions of others and express an individual predisposition for self-transcendence at the expense of self-enhancement are affected by network diversity to a greater extent. Further, the effect of diversity on tolerance is mediated by the perceived threat from the relevant group.


Tolerance Values Network diversity Contact Heterogeneity Israel 



For invaluable advice, support and inspiration at different stages of the project we are indebted to Michal Shamir. We are also grateful to Michal Shamir for the use of data from the 2011 tolerance survey. We greatly benefited from comments from the journal’s editors and reviewers. Finally, part of the project was written when the first author was a Fellow in the Department of Political Science at Tel Aviv University, and she deeply appreciates their hospitality and the generous financial support of VATAT. All remaining errors are our own.

Supplementary material

11109_2014_9284_MOESM1_ESM.docx (260 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 259 kb)


  1. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1965). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations, an analytic study. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Economic inequality and intolerance: Attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 942–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arian, A., Barnea, S., Ben-Nun, P., Ventura, R., & Shamir, M. (2005). The 2005 Israeli democracy index: A decade after the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bar-Tal, D., & Teichman, Y. (2005). Stereotypes and prejudice in conflict: Representations of Arabs in Israeli Jewish society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beetham, D. (Ed.). (1994). Defining and measuring democracy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Bello, J., & Rolfe, M. (2014). Is influence mightier than selection? Forging agreement in political discussion networks during a campaign. Social Networks, 36, 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Arikan, G. (2012). A two-edged sword: The differential effect of religious belief and religious social context on attitudes towards democracy. Political Behavior, 34, 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ben-Nun Bloom, P., Arikan, G., & Sommer, U. (2014). Globalization, threat and religious freedom. Political Studies, 62, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Levitan, L. C. (2011). We’re closer than I thought: Social network heterogeneity, morality, and political persuasion. Political Psychology, 32, 643–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S. H., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chong, D. (2006). Free speech and multiculturalism in and out of the academy. Political Psychology, 27, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, A. J. (2004). What tolerance is. Ethics, 115, 68–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corbett, M. (1982). Political tolerance in America. London, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Crandall, C. S. (1991). Multiple stigma and AIDS: Medical stigma and attitudes toward homosexuals and IV-drug uses in AIDS-related stigmatization. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 1, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Billiet, J., & Schmidt, P. (2008). Values and the support for immigration: A cross country comparison. European Sociological Review, 24, 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies, K., Tropp, L. R., Aron, A., Pettigrew, T. F., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Cross group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Zavala, G. G., Cislak, A., & Wesolowska, E. (2010). Political conservatism, need for cognitive closure, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology, 31, 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Djupe, P. A. (2011). Political pluralism and the information search: Determinants of group opinionation. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Djupe, P. A., & Calfano, B. R. (2012). American Muslim investment in civil society: Political discussion, disagreement, and tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 517–529.Google Scholar
  25. Eisenstein, M. (2006). Rethinking the Relationship between religion and political tolerance in the US. Political Behavior, 28, 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erisen, E., & Erisen, C. (2012). The effect of social networks on the quality of political thinking. Political Psychology, 33, 839–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eveland, W. P, Jr, & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and ‘heterogeneity’ of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eveland, W. P, Jr, & Kleinman, S. B. (2013). Comparing general and political discussion networks within voluntary organizations using social network analysis. Political Behavior, 35, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Falomir-Pichastor, J., & Frederic, N. (2013). The dark side of heterogeneous ingroup identities: National identification, perceived threat, and prejudice against immigrants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fearon, J. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012). Disagreement and the avoidance of political discussion: Aggregate relationships and differences across personality traits. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 849–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibson, J. L. (1992). Alternative measures of political tolerance: Must tolerance be ‘least-liked?’. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibson, J. L. (2006). Do strong group identities fuel intolerance? Evidence from the South African case. Political Psychology, 27, 665–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gibson, J. L., & Claassen, C. (2010). Racial reconciliation in South Africa: Interracial contact and changes over time. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glaser, J. (1994). Back to the black belt: Racial environment and white racial attitudes in the South. Journal of Politics, 56, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Golebiowska, E. (1995). Individual value priorities, education, and political tolerance. Political Behavior, 17, 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. González, R., & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identification in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gustavsson, G. (2012). Freedom in mass values: Egocentric, humanistic, or both? Using Isaiah Berlin to understand a contemporary debate. European Political Science Review, 4, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2014). The uncertainty paradox: Perceived threat moderates the effect of uncertainty on political tolerance. Political Psychology, 35, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heyd, D. (1996). Toleration: An elusive virtue. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hibbing, M. V., Ritchie, M., & Anderson, M. A. (2011). Personality and political discussion. Political Behavior, 33(4), 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81, 1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics and social communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J., & Levine, J. (2000). The dynamics of collective deliberation in the 1996 election: Campaign effects on accessibility, certainty, and accuracy. American Political Science Review, 94, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hurwitz, J., & Mondak, J. J. (2002). Democratic principles, discrimination and political intolerance. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hutchison, M., & Gibler, D. (2007). Political tolerance and territorial threat: A cross-national study. Journal of Politics, 69, 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ikeda, K., & Richey, S. (2009). The impact of diversity in informal social networks on tolerance in Japan. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy—and How do we measure it? Political Science and Politics, 36, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Karpov, V. (2002). Religiosity and tolerance in the United States and Poland. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Laumann, E. O. (1973). Bonds of pluralism: The form and substance of urban social networks. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. NY: Columbia.Google Scholar
  54. Lazer, D., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N., & Neblo, M. (2010). The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication, 27, 248–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2009). Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1057–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levitan, L. C., & Wronski, J. (2013). Social context and information seeking: Examining the effects of network attitudinal composition on engagement with political information. Political Behavior, 35, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lindner, N. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Alienable speech: Ideological variations in the application of free-speech principles. Political Psychology, 30, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lupton, R. N., Singh S. P., & Thornton, J. R. (2014). The moderating impact of social networks on the relationships among core values, partisanship, and candidate evaluations. Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12102.
  59. Maoz, I. (2011). Contact in protracted asymmetrical conflict: Twenty years of planned encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcus, G., Sullivan, J., Theiss-Morse, E., & Stevens, D. (2005). The emotional foundation of political cognition: The impact of extrinsic anxiety on the formation of political tolerance judgments. Political Psychology, 26, 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Marcus, G., Sullivan, J., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Marquart-Pyatt, S., & Paxton, P. (2007). In principle and in practice: Learning political tolerance in eastern and western Europe. Political Behavior, 29, 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 737–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 24, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mondak, J. J., & Hurwitz, J. (1998). Values, acts, and actors: Distinguishing generic and discriminatory intolerance. Political Behavior, 20, 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mondak, J. J., & Sanders, M. S. (2003). Tolerance and intolerance, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 492–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mondak, J. J., & Sanders, M. (2005). The Complexity of tolerance and intolerance judgments: A response to Gibson. Political Behavior, 27, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mutz, D. C. (2002a). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mutz, D. C. (2002b). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The Workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics, 6, 140–155.Google Scholar
  74. Nie, N., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  75. Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 422–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Oliver, E. J., & Wong, J. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pattie, C. J., & Johnson, R. J. (2008). It’s good to talk: Talk, disagreement and tolerance. British Journal of Political Science, 48, 677–698.Google Scholar
  78. Peffley, M., Knigge, P., & Hurwitz, J. (2001). A multiple values model of political tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. NY: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Robinson, C. (2010). Cross-cutting messages and political tolerance: An experiment using Evangelical Protestants. Political Behavior, 32, 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Roccas, S., & Amit, A. (2011). Group heterogeneity and tolerance: The moderating role of conservation values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 898–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 201–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  88. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Scheufele, D., Hardy, A., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56, 728–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  91. Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal study. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., et al. (2013). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 Countries. Political Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z.
  93. Seligman, C., & Katz, A. (1996). The dynamics of value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  94. Shamir, M., & Sagiv-Schifter, T. (2006). Conflict, identity, and tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa intifada. Political Psychology, 27, 569–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and Cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  96. Stein, R., Post, S., & Rinden, A. (2000). Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Stephan, W., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sullivan, J., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  99. Sullivan, J., Shamir, M., Walsh, P., & Roberts, N. (1985). Political tolerance in context. CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  100. Sullivan, J., Walsh, P., Shamir, M., Barnum, D., & Gibson, J. (1993). Why politicians are more tolerant: Selective recruitment and socialization among political elites in Britain, Israel, New-Zealand, and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tadmor, C., Tetlock, P., & Peng, K. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 105–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Testa, P. F., Hibbing, M. V., & Ritchie, M. (2014). Orientations toward conflict and the conditional effects of political disagreement. The Journal of Politics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  104. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Weldon, S. A. (2006). The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Political Science, Centre for Jewish StudiesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations