The Influence of President Obama’s, Middle Name on Middle Eastern and U.S. Perceptions
- 419 Downloads
In a series of cross-cultural experiments, we explore whether mentioning President Obama’s middle name facilitates or impedes his delicate position as a peace broker. Our results show that including Obama’s middle name affects perceptions of Obama and his proposals for the Middle East among Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs. We examine whether the use of Obama’s middle name inspires the same reactions in the United States by replicating the study among those who sympathize with Israelis and those who sympathize with Palestinians. Results show that the effect of Obama’s middle name differs in the United States. This study has important implications, not only for the President Obama’s standing in the Arab world and for the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, but also for our understanding of subtle ethnic cues and biases across cultural contexts.
KeywordsNews Priming Israeli–Palestinian conflict Ethnic cues Reactive devaluation Obama
The authors would like to thank Bathen Fisher, Einav Jerochim, and Steven Seybold for their much appreciated assistance.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
- Cavari, A. (2012). Religious beliefs, elite polarization, and public opinion on foreign policy: The partisan gap in American public opinion toward Israel. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edr053.
- Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Haaretz Service (2010, July 8). Obama: Israelis suspicious of me because my middle name. Haaretz.com.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, D. L., & Zanna, M. P. (1972). Differential weighting of favorable and unfavorable attributes in impressions of personality. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 204–212.Google Scholar
- Hovland C. I. & Weiss, W. (1951/52). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650.Google Scholar
- Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Mendelberg, Tali. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Edelman, C., Passo, W., et al. (2009). The effects of semantics and social desirability in correcting the Obama myth. Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 13, pp. 173–212). New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Dillman Carpentier, F. (2009). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 74–93). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
- Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372–385.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head pherlomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar