The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives
- 1.1k Downloads
American politics has become more polarized. The source of the phenomena is debated. We posit that human mate choice may play a role in the process. Spouses are highly correlated in their political preferences, and research in behavioral genetics, neuroscience, and endocrinology shows that political preferences develop through a complex interaction of social upbringing, life experience, immediate circumstance, and genes and hormones, operating through one’s psychological architecture by Hatemi et al. (J Theor Politics, 24:305–327, 2012). Consequently, if people with similar political values produce children, there will be more individuals at the ideological extremes over generations. This said, we are left with a mystery: spousal concordance on political attitudes does not result from convergence over the course of the relationship, nor are spouses initially selecting one another on political preferences. We examine whether positive mate assortation—like seeks like—on non-political factors such as lifestyle and demographics could lead to inadvertent assortation on political preferences. Using a sample of Internet dating profiles we find that both liberals and conservatives seek to date individuals who are like themselves. This result suggests a pathway by which long-term couples come to share political preferences, which in turn could be fueling the widening ideological gap in the United States.
KeywordsIdeology Polarization Human mate choice Mate assortation
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Chadwick Martin Bailey (2010). Recent trends: Online dating. Retrieved from http://cp.match.com/cppp/media/CMB_Study.pdf.
- Eaves, L. J., Eysenck, H. J., & Martin, N. G. (1989). Genes, culture and personality: An empirical approach. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Maes, H. H., Neale, M. C., Kendler, K. S., et al. (1999). Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Research, 2, 62–80.Google Scholar
- Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Gerson, M. 2010. Liberals resort to conspiracy theories to explain Obama’s problems. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
- Hatemi, P. K., Byrne, E., & McDermott, R. (2012). What is a “gene” and why does it matter for political science? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24, 305–327.Google Scholar
- Imai, K., King, G., & Lau, O. (2007a). Zelig: Everyone’s statistical software. Retrieved from http://gking.harvard.edu.
- Imai, K., King, G., & Lau, O. (2007b). ls: least squares regression for continuous dependent variables. In K. Imai, G. King, & O. Lau (Eds.), Zelig: Everyone’s statistical software. Retrieved from http://gking.harvard.edu.
- Jennings, M. K., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political similarity and influence between husbands and wives. Prepared for the 2000 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Jones, M. (2012). Obama ratings historically polarized. Retrieved from www.gallup.com.
- Kanazawa, S. (2010). Why liberals and atheists are more intelligent. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 33–57.Google Scholar
- Klofstad, C. A., McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2011). Do bedroom eyes wear political glasses?: The role of politics in human mate attraction. Evolution and Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.06.002.
- Kofoed, E. (2008). The role of political affiliations and attraction in romantic relationships: Why can’t we all just get along? Advances in Communication Theory & Research, 2. Retrieved from http://www.k-state.edu/actr/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/4kofoed-politics-and-attraction.pdf.
- Madden, M. & Lenhart, A. (2006). On line dating. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org.
- Milbank, D. 2012. Rick Santorum cries Nazi. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
- Sailer, S. (2004). Baby gap: How birthrates color the electoral map. The American Conservative. Retrieved from http://amconmag.com.
- Stelter, B. 2012. After apology, national advertisers are still shunning Limbaugh. The New York Times.Google Scholar
- Stoker, L., & Jennings, K. M. (2006). Political similarity and influence between husbands and wives. In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics. Philadelphia: Temple.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, A. S., Fitzgerald, J., & Dasovic, J. (2005). Do couples support the same political parties? In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple.Google Scholar