Political Behavior

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 291–311 | Cite as

Distrust in Government Leaders, Demand for Leadership Change, and Preference for Popular Elections in Rural China

Original Paper


This paper examines the relationship between distrust in incumbent government leaders and demand for systemic changes in rural China. It finds that individuals who distrust government leaders’ commitment to the public interest have both stronger demand for leadership change and stronger preference for popular elections. It argues that distrust in government leaders may have enhanced the demand for leadership change, which in turn may have reinforced the preference for elections. It further argues that distrust in incumbent leaders has in effect induced a demand for systemic changes, as introducing popular election of government leaders would require a major constitutional amendment. The paper suggests that two distinctive mechanisms may be at work in determining whether distrust in current government authorities induces preference for systemic changes. Whether citizens can engineer leadership change through existing channels influences the generation of idealistic wishes for a better political system. Perceived availability of better and viable alternatives affects whether idealistic wishes become a practical preference.


Political trust Distrust in government leaders Leadership change Systemic changes 



This project was funded by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Government (Grant No. CUHK2440/06H). I thank my collaborators for administering the survey. For insightful comments and suggestions, I thank the editors, two anonymous reviewers, Pierre Landry, Xiaobo Lu, Jeremy Wallace, and especially Kevin O’Brien and Melanie Manion.


  1. Abramson, P. R. (1972). Political efficacy and political trust among black schoolchildren: Two explanations. Journal of Politics, 34, 1243–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abravanel, M. D., & Busch, R. J. (1975). Political competence, political trust, and the action orientations of university students. Journal of Politics, 37, 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Achen, C. H. (1978). Measuring representation. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 475–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. J., & LoTempio, A. J. (2002). Winning, losing and political trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 335–352.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avery, J. M. (2006). The sources and consequences of political mistrust among African Americans. American Politics Research, 34, 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Avery, J. M. (2007). Race, partisanship, and political trust following Bush versus Gore (2000). Political Behavior, 29, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balch, G. I. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept “sense of political efficacy”. Political Methodology, 1, 1–43.Google Scholar
  9. Berinsky, A. J. (2004). Silent voices: Public opinion and political participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bratton, M., & Mattes, R. (2001). Support for democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or instrumental? British Journal of Political Science, 31, 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns, J. P. (Ed.). (1989). The Chinese communist party’s nomenklatura system. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  13. Caddell, P. H. (1979). Trapped in a downward spiral. Public Opinion, 2, 2–7, 52–55, 58–60.Google Scholar
  14. Cai, Y. (2008). Local governments and the suppression of popular resistance in China. China Quarterly, 193, 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan, H. S. (2004). Cadre personnel management in China: The nomenklatura system, 1990–1998. China Quarterly, 179, 703–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government—a time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, J. (2004). Popular political support in urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 68, 973–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Citrin, J., & Muste, C. (1999). Trust in government. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 465–532). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Craig, S. C., & Maggiotto, M. A. (1982). Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology, 8, 89–110.Google Scholar
  23. Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12, 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political parties and political representation: Party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18, 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dong, L. (2006). Direct town elections in China: Latest developments and prospects. Journal of Contemporary China, 15, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Finkel, S. E., Muller, E. N., & Seligson, M. A. (1989). Economic crisis, incumbent performance and regime support: A comparison of longitudinal data from West Germany and Costa Rica. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fraser, J. (1970). The impact of community and regime orientations on choice of political system. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 14, 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hetherington, M. J. (2004). Why trust matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hill, D. B. (1981). Attitude generalization and the measurement of trust in American leadership. Political Behavior, 3, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huber, J. D., & Powell, G. B., Jr. (1994). Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Politics, 46, 291–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamal, A. (2007). When is social trust a desirable outcome? Examining levels of trust in the Arab World. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 1328–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, I. (2005). Political trust in societies under transformation: A comparative analysis of Poland and Ukraine. International Journal of Sociology, 35, 63–84.Google Scholar
  36. Kinder, D. R. (1981). Presidents, prosperity, and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95, 49–69.Google Scholar
  38. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li, L. (2002). The politics of introducing direct township elections in China. China Quarterly, 171, 704–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, L. (2004). Political trust in rural China. Modern China, 30, 228–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, L., & O’Brien, K. J. (1996). Villagers and popular resistance in contemporary China. Modern China, 22, 28–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li, L., & O’Brien, K. J. (2008). Protest leadership in rural China. China Quarterly, 193, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. G. (1983). The decline of confidence in American institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 98, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Manion, M. (1994). Survey research in the study of contemporary China: Learning from local samples. China Quarterly, 139, 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manion, M. (1996). The electoral connection in the Chinese countryside. American Political Science Review, 90, 736–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manion, M. (2000). Chinese democratization in perspective: Electorates and selectorates at the town level. China Quarterly, 63, 764–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manion, M. (2006). Democracy, community, trust: The impact of elections in rural China. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Manion, M. (2008). When communist party candidates can lose, who wins? Assessing the role of local people’s congresses in the selection of leaders in China. China Quarterly, 195, 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999). Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, A. H. (1974a). Political issues and trust in government, 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68, 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, A. H. (1974b). Rejoinder to “comment” by Jack Citrin: Political discontent or ritualism? American Political Science Review, 68, 989–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller, W. E. (1979). Confidence in government or a crisis in leadership? Misreading the public pulse. Public Opinion, 2, 9–15, 60.Google Scholar
  55. Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20, 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muller, E. N., & Jukam, T. O. (1977). On the meaning of political support. American Political Science Review, 71, 1561–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  58. O’Brien, K. J. (1990). Reform without liberalization: China’s national people’s congress and the politics of institutional change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Brien, K. J. (Ed.). (2008). Popular protest in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (2000). Accommodating “democracy” in a one-party state: Introducing village elections in China. China Quarterly, 162, 465–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Reisinger, W. M., Miller, A. H., Heslik, V., & Maher, K. H. (1994). Political values in Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania: Sources and implications for democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 24, 183–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rose, R. (2007). Learning to support new regimes in Europe. Journal of Democracy, 18, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rose, R., & Shin, D. C. (2001). Democratization backwards: The problem of third wave democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 31, 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sarsfield, R., & Echegaray, F. (2006). Opening the black box: How satisfaction with democracy and its perceived efficacy affect regime preference in Latin America. International Journal of Public Opinions Research, 18, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schedler, A. (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  70. Seligson, M. A. (2002a). Trouble in paradise? The erosion of system support in Costa Rica, 1978–1999. Latin American Research Review, 37, 160–185.Google Scholar
  71. Seligson, M. A. (2002b). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64, 408–433.Google Scholar
  72. Shi, T. (1999). Village committee elections in China: Institutionalist tactics for democracy. World Politics, 51, 385–412.Google Scholar
  73. Shi, T. (2001). Cultural values and political trust: A comparison of the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. Comparative Politics, 33, 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. SPSS Inc. (2008). SPSS missing values 17.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  75. Stelzl, I. (1986). Changing a causal hypothesis without changing the fit: Some rules for generating equivalent path models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sztompka, P. (2000). Trust: A sociological theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Tang, W. (2005). Public opinion and political change in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Tsai, L. L. (2007). Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. American Political Science Review, 101, 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Waldron-Moore, P. (1999). Eastern Europe at the crossroads of democratic transition: Evaluating support for democratic institutions, satisfaction with democratic government, and consolidation of democratic regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 32, 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walker, K. L. (2006). Gangster capitalism and peasant protest in China: The last twenty years. Journal of Peasant Studies, 33, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Warwick, P. V. (1998). Disputed cause, disputed effect: The postmaterialist thesis re-examined. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 583–609.Google Scholar
  82. Weatherford, M. S. (1984). Economic stagflation and public support for the political system. British Journal of Political Science, 14, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2008). The local connection: Local government performance and satisfaction with democracy in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhu, J.-H. (1996). “I don’t know” in public opinion surveys in China: Individual and contextual causes of item non-response. Journal of Contemporary China, 5, 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Government and Public AdministrationChinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations