Advertisement

Photonic Network Communications

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 71–81 | Cite as

Renewable energy-aware grooming in optical networks

  • Thilo Schöndienst
  • Vinod M. Vokkarane
Article

Abstract

The optical layer of a network is the energy-efficient technology to provision high bandwidths for data transport. Unfortunately, occasional electronic processing is unavoidable in current networks. This process is much more energy-consuming than the optical transport. Recent research has already yielded great improvements in terms of energy efficiency. It is, however, observed that increased energy efficiency typically leads to higher overall energy consumption. Therefore, it is imperative to reduce the environmental impact by additional means: maximizing the use of renewable energy. We present an approach to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission-reducing grooming by considering the heterogeneous distribution of fossil and renewable energy sources. We analyze various two-step solutions for the route calculation and lightpath provisioning problem in IP-over-WDM mesh networks. We show that it is possible to reduce GHG emissions at a stable level of energy consumption and improved blocking performance compared to previous energy-efficient solutions.

Keywords

Optical WDM network IP-over-WDM Grooming GHG emission Green RWA  Energy source awareness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Department of Energy (DOE) COMMON project under grant DE-SC0004909 and the NSF CARGONET project under grant CNS-1406370.

References

  1. 1.
    Aksanli, B., Rosing, T., Monga, I.: Benefits of green energy and proportionality in high speed wide area networks connecting data centers. In: Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE), 2012, pp. 175–180 (2012). doi: 10.1109/DATE.2012.6176458
  2. 2.
    Amini, O., Pérennes, S., Sau, I.: Hardness and approximation of traffic grooming. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on algorithms and computation, pp. 561–573. Springer-Verlag (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beloglazov, A., Buyya, R., Lee, Y., Zomaya, A.: A taxonomy and survey of energy-efficient data centers and cloud computing systems. Adv. Comput. 82(2), 47–111 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bianzino, A., Chaudet, C., Rossi, D., Rougier, J.L.: A survey of green networking research. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 14(1), 3–20 (2012). doi: 10.1109/SURV.2011.113010.00106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boddie, M.P., Schöndienst, T., Vokkarane, V.M.: Dual power source aware algorithms for green optical network survivability. In: IEEE Online Conference on Green, Communications (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cavdar, C., Ruiz, M., Monti, P., Velasco, L., Wosinska, L.: Design of green optical networks with signal quality guarantee. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong, X., El-Gorashi, T., Elmirghani, J.: IP over WDM networks employing renewable energy sources. J. Lightw. Technol. 29(1), 3–14 (2011). doi: 10.1109/JLT.2010.2086434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dong, X., El-Gorashi, T.E.H., Elmirghani, J.M.H.: On the energy efficiency of physical topology design for IP over WDM networks. J. Lightw. Technol. 30(12), 1694–1705 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gattulli, M., Tornatore, M., Fiandray, R., Pattavina, A.: Low-carbon routing algorithms for cloud computing services in IP-over-WDM networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hasan, M.M., Farahmand, F., Jue, J.P., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.: A study of energy-aware traffic grooming in optical networks: static and dynamic cases. IEEE Syst. J. 7(1) (2013). doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2012.2207829
  11. 11.
    Huang, S., Seshadri, D., Dutta, R.: Traffic grooming: a changing role in green optical networks. In: IEEE GLOBECOM (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huelsermann, R., Gunkel, M., Meusburger, C., Schupke, D.A.: Cost modeling and evaluation of capital expenditures in optical multilayer networks. Opt. Netw. 7(9), 814–833 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Idzikowski, F., Chiaraviglio, L., and Portoso, F.: Optimal design of green multi-layer core networks. In: 2012 Third International Conference on Future Energy Systems: Where Energy, Computing and Communication Meet (e-Energy), May 2012, pp. 1–9Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Idzikowski, F., Orlowski, S., Raack, C., Woesner, H., Wolisz, A.: Saving energy in IP-over-WDM networks by switching off line cards in low-demand scenarios. In: 2010 14th Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM), Feb 2010, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Korotky, S.: Network global expectation model, a statistical formalism for quickly quantifying network needs and costs. J. Lightw. Technol. 22(3), 703–722 (2004). doi: 10.1109/JLT.2004.825756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lemay, M., Nguyen, K.K., St. Arnaud, B., Cheriet, M.: Toward a zero-carbon network: converging cloud computing and network virtualization. IEEE Internet Comput. 16(6) (2012). doi: 10.1109/MIC.2011.128.
  17. 17.
    Marsan, M., Guerrero, C., Buzzi, S., Idzikowski, F., Chiaraviglio, L., Meo, M., Ye, Y., López Vizcaíno, L.: TREND: toward real energy-efficient network design. In Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT), 2012, Oct 2012, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Musumeci, F., Tornatore, M., Pattavina, A.: A power consumption analysis for IP-over-WDM core network architectures. IEEE/OSA J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4(2), 108–117 (2012). doi: 10.1364/JOCN.4.000108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neves, L., Krajewski, J., Jung, P., Bockemuehl, M.: SMARTer2020. Tech. Rep, Global e-Sustainability Initiative (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ricciardi, S., Palmieri, F., Fiore, U., Careglio, D., Santos-Boada, G., Solé-Pareta, J.: An energy-aware dynamic RWA framework for next-generation wavelength-routed networks. Comput. Netw. 56(10), 2420–2442 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.03.016
  21. 21.
    Saunders, H.D.: The khazzoom-brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy J. 13(4), 130–148 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schöndienst, T., Davis, D.A., Plante, J.M., Vokkarane, V.M.: Renewable Energy-Aware manycast overlays. University of Massachusetts Lowell, Technical Report (2013). http://www.cis.umassd.edu/tschoendienst/ManycastTechreport
  23. 23.
    Schöndienst, T., Plante, J.M., Davis, D.A., Vokkarane, V.M.: Energy Source-Aware manycast overlay in WDM networks. In: Globecom 2013—Optical Networks and Systems Symposium (GC13 ONS). Atlanta, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schöndienst, T., Vokkarane, V.M.: Renewable Energy-Aware grooming in IP-over-WDM networks. In: 2014 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, Green Computing, Networking and Communications Symposium (ICNC’14–GCNC) (Accepted for publication). Honolulu, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schöndienst, T., Vokkarane, V.M.: Reducing the environmental impact of optical networks. In PhD Forum of the 27th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2013 PhD Forum). Boston, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    US Department of Energy: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL: Dynamic Maps, GIS Data, and Analysis Tools—Renewable Energy Technical Potential . http://www.nrel.gov/gis/re_potential.html
  27. 27.
    Van Heddeghem, W., Idzikowski, F., Vereecken, W., Colle, D., Pickavet, M., Demeester, P.: Power consumption modeling in optical multilayer networks. Photonic Netw. Commun. 24(2), 86–102 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, J., Fagertun, A.M., Ruepp, S., Dittmann, L.: Analysis of energy efficiency in dynamic optical networks employing solar energy sources. In International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), pp. 590–593 (2013). doi: 10.1109/ICCNC.2013.6504152
  29. 29.
    World Resources Institute (WRI), World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Carbon Trust, Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI): GHG protocol product life cycle accounting and reporting standard ICT sector guidance (2013). DRAFTGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yetginer, E., Rouskas, G.N.: Power efficient traffic grooming in optical WDM networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang, Y., Chowdhury, P., Tornatore, M., Mukherjee, B.: Energy efficiency in telecom optical networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 12(4), 441–458 (2010). doi: 10.1109/SURV.2011.062410.00034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations