Photonic Network Communications

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 233–238 | Cite as

New traffic grooming approaches in optical networks under restricted shared protection



In this paper, two traffic grooming approaches based on alternate path routing are proposed to accommodate a greater number of connections in optical networks. In the first approach (called as Source_SWG), the connections of same source and different destinations along a path are groomed in a wavelength channel, whereas in the second approach (called as Des_SWG), the connections of the same destination and different sources along a path are groomed in a wavelength channel. These approaches are compared with existing heuristic traffic grooming algorithms based on fixed routing. It is found that both the approaches provide less wavelengths than the existing heuristic traffic grooming algorithms for establishment of all the connections present in the network. The comparative studies of these approaches are also made under restricted shared protection. It is seen that in case of Source_SWG, the number of wavelengths required for establishment of all the connections present in the network is less than that for Des_SWG.


Shared protection Setup time Blocking probability Traffic grooming 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Simmons J.M., Goldstein E.L., Saleh A.A.M.: Quantifying the benefit of wavelength add-drop in WDM rings with distance independent and dependent traffic. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Tech. 17, 48–57 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerstel O., Ramaswami R., Sasaki G.H.: Cost-effective traffic grooming in WDM rings. IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. 18, 618–630 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiu A.L., Modiano E.H.: Traffic grooming algorithms for reducing electronic multiplexing costs in wdm ring networks. IEEE/OSA J. Ligthwave Tech. 8, 2–12 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang X., Qiao C.: An effective and comprehensive approach for traffic grooming and wavelength assignment in SONET/WDM rings. IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. 8, 608–617 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhemin, D., Hamdi, M.: Clustering Technique for Traffic Grooming in optical WDM Mesh Networks. IEEE GLOBECOM 3, 2711–2715 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mukhopadhyay, A., Singh, J.K., Biswas, U., Naskar, M.K.: Distributed Approaches for Dynamic Traffic Grooming in WDM Optical Networks. Proc. Int. Conf. Commun. CODEC 1, 100–104 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, D., Sun, Z., Jia, X., Makki, K. Traffic grooming on General topology WDM networks. IEE Proc. Commun. 150(3), 197–201 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, R.D., Kumaran, K., Liu, G., Sanjee, I.: SPIDER: a simple and flexible tool for design and provisioning of protected light paths in optical networks. Bell Labs Tech. J. 6, 82–96 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zang H., Jue J. P., Sahasrabuddhe L., Ramamurthy R., Mukherjee B.: Dynamic light path establishment in wavelength-routed networks. IEEE Comm. Mag. 39(9), 100–107 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sahu P.P., Pradhan R.: Blocking probability analysis for shared protected optical network with Wavelength converter. J. opt. commun. 28, 1–4 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahu P.P.: A new shared protection scheme for optical network. Curr. Sci. J. 91(9), 1176–1184 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringTezpur UniversityTezpurIndia

Personalised recommendations