Advertisement

Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics

, Volume 52, Issue 9–10, pp 545–550 | Cite as

Open-Cell Metal–SiC Composite Foams made by Electrolytic Codeposition on Polyurethane Substrates

  • V. Mikutski
  • O. Smorygo
  • D. Shchurevich
  • A. Marukovich
  • A. Ilyushchenko
  • A. Gokhale
  • R. Nadella
  • V. Sadykov
  • V. Usoltsev
Article

In this research, open cell Ni–SiC and Cu–SiC composite foams are produced by electrolytic codeposition on the polyurethane foam substrates using conventional metal plating electrolytes with suspended SiC nanoparticles. The method ensures the production of MMC open-cell foams; content of SiC inclusions in the metal matrix of up to 10 wt.% can be controlled by the SiC powder concentration in the electrolytes. Effects of the foam pore size (surface area) and the electrolyte composition on the content of SiC inclusions and the density gradient across the foam are studied.

Keywords

open cell foam electrolytic replication MMC structure co-deposition silicon carbide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge DRDO, India and Belarussian Foundation of Fundamental Research (integrated project of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus and Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences T12CO-020) for the support of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    M. F. Ashby, “The properties of foams and lattices,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. A, 364, 15–30 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Banhart, “Manufacture, characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams,” Prog. Mater. Sci., 46, 559–632 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Giani, G. Groppi, and E. Tronconi, “Mass-transfer characterization of metallic foams as supports for structured catalysts,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44, 4993–5002 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. J. Lu, A. Hess, and M. F. Ashby, “Sound absorption in metallic foams,” J. Appl. Phys., 85, 7528–7539 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. N. Leonov, O. L. Smorygo, and V. K. Sheleg, “Monolithic catalyst supports with foam structure,” React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 60, 259–267 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Leonov and A. Romashko, “Quality control of foam metals produced electrochemically,” in: J. Banhart and N. Fleck (eds.), Cellular Metals: Manufacture, Properties, Applications, Verlag MIT Publishing, Berlin (2003), pp. 158–161.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. Smorygo et al., “Nickel foams with oxidation-resistant coatings formed by combustion synthesis,” Scripta Mater., 58, 910–913 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Smorygo et al., “Structured catalyst supports and catalysts for the methane indirect internal steam reforming in the intermediate temperature SOFC,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 4, 9505–9514 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Gomes et al., “Electrodeposition of metal matrix nanocomposites: improvement of the chemical characterization techniques,” in: B. Reddy (ed.), Advances in Nanocomposites—Synthesis, Characterization and Industrial Applications, InTech, Rijeka (2011), pp. 503–526.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. K. Lee, H. Y. Lee, and J. M. Jeon, “Codeposition of micro- and nanosized SiC particles in the nickel matrix composite coatings obtained by electroplating,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 201, 4711–4717 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Zhu et al., “Study on composite electroforming of Cu/SiCp composites,” Mater. Lett., 58, 1634–1637 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. J. Brown and S. Sotiropoulos, “Electroplating and electroless plating of Ni through/onto porous a polymer in a flow cell,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 31, 1203–1212 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. A. Shluger (ed.), Galvanic Coatings in Mechanical Engineering: Handbook [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Shalkauskas and A. Vashkjalis, Chemical Metallization of Plastics [in Russian], Chemistry Publishing, Leningrad (1985).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. A. Belen’kijj and A. F. Ivanov, Handbook of Electrodeposition of Metallic Coatings [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. Smorygo et al., “An inverted spherical model of open-cell foam structure,” Acta Mater., 59, 2669–2678 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Mikutski
    • 1
  • O. Smorygo
    • 1
  • D. Shchurevich
    • 1
  • A. Marukovich
    • 1
  • A. Ilyushchenko
    • 1
  • A. Gokhale
    • 2
  • R. Nadella
    • 2
  • V. Sadykov
    • 3
  • V. Usoltsev
    • 3
  1. 1.Powder Metallurgy InstituteMinskRepublic Belarus
  2. 2.Defense Metallurgical Research LaboratoryHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Boreskov Institute of CatalysisNovosibirskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations