Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 644–651 | Cite as

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Seedling Populations of Pyrus pashia

  • Yu Zong
  • Ping Sun
  • Jing Liu
  • Xiaoyan Yue
  • Kunming Li
  • Yuanwen Teng
Original Paper


Pyrus pashia, described as an intermediate species between oriental and occidental pear groups, is one of the most important wild pears. This study used microsatellite markers at 14 loci to assay genetic diversity and differentiation within P. pashia using three complementary methods. Four hundred and seventy seedlings were obtained from 38 half-sib families from four sites in the central Yunnan Province of China. These 14 loci displayed high polymorphism, and the descriptive statistics of diversity varied significantly among seedling populations. One hundred and seventy-three different alleles were detected, with an average of 12.4 alleles per locus. The overall expected and observed heterozygosity values were 0.749 and 0.643, respectively. Allelic richness at the different sites ranged from 1.00 to 20.36, and the Shannon’s information index for each locus was from 0.35 to 2.37, with a mean value of 1.82. Genetic differentiation was detected at both family and site levels using Bayesian model and neighbor-joining clustering approaches and the results compared with that of principal coordinate analysis. Two clusters, each with a similar number of families, were detected in the data set. Analysis of molecular variation indicated that the major variation occurred within families and that the minimum partitions of genetic variation exist among families, representing 89.14 and 10.86 % of the total variety, respectively. Families derived from site 2 displayed the maximum allelic richness and had a greatly mixed genetic composition. We recommend that these, especially families 9, 11, and 12, should be the focus of future preservation and usage investigations.


Genetic diversity Seedling Population structure Pyrus pashia 



This work was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30871690).

Supplementary material

11105_2013_680_MOESM1_ESM.doc (28 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 28 kb)


  1. Bai WN, Liao WJ, Zhang DY (2010) Nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogeography reveal two refuge areas with asymmetrical gene flow in a temperate walnut tree from East Asia. New Phytol 188:892–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao L, Chen KS, Zhang D, Cao YF, Yamamoto T, Teng YW (2007) Genetic diversity and similarity of pear cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:959–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao L, Chen KS, Zhang D, Li XG, Teng YW (2008) An assessment of genetic variability and relationships within Asian pears based on AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers. Sci Hortic 116:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao YF, Tian LM, Gao Y, Liu FZ (2012) Genetic diversity of cultivated and wild Ussurian pear (Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim.) in China evaluated with M13-tailed SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Challice JS, Westwood MN (1973) Numerical taxonomic studies of the genus Pyrus using both chemical and botanical characters. Bot J Linn Soc 67:121–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiang T, Chiang Y, Chen YJ, Chou C, Havanond S, Hong TN, Huang S (2001) Phylogeography of Kandelia candel in East Asiatic mangroves based on nucleotide variation of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNAs. Mol Ecol 10:2697–2710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeAndres MT, Benito A, Perez-Rivera G, Ocete R, Lopez MA, Gaforio L, Munoz G, Cabello F, Zapater J, Arroyo-Garcia R (2012) Genetic diversity of wild grapevine populations in Spain and their genetic relationships with cultivated grapevines. Mol Ecol 21:800–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  9. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erfani J, Ebadi A, Abdollahi H, Fatahi R (2012) Genetic diversity of some pear cultivars and genotypes using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:1065–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Excoffier L, Lischer H (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira dos Santos A, Ramos-Cabrer AM, Diaz-Hernandez MB, Pereira-Lorenzo S (2011) Genetic variability and diversification process in local pear cultivars from northwestern Spain using microsatellites. Tree Genet Genomes 7:1041–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gianfranceschi L, Seglias N, Tarchini R, Komjanc M, Gessler C (1998) Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theor Appl Genet 96:1069–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices version 2.9.3.
  16. Hunt HV, Campana MG, Lawes MC, Park YJ, Bower MA, Howe CJ, Jones MK (2011) Genetic diversity and phylogeography of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) across Eurasia. Mol Ecol 20:4756–4771PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huson DH, Scornavacca C (2012) Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol 61:1061–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jolivet C, Holtken AM, Liesebach H, Steiner W, Degen B (2011) Spatial genetic structure in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.): I. Variation among natural populations of different density. Tree Genet Genomes 7:271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katayama H, Adachi S, Yamamoto T, Uematsu C (2007) A wide range of genetic diversity in pear (Pyrus ussuriensis var. aromatica) genetic resources from Iwate, Japan revealed by SSR and chloroplast DNA markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1573–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krause S, Hammer K, Buerkert A (2007) Morphological biodiversity and local use of the Himalayan pear (Pyrus pashia) in Central Bhutan. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1245–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langella O (2000) POPULATIONS 1.2: population genetic software, individuals or population distance, phylogenetic trees.∼tryphon/populations/
  23. Liebhard R, Gianfranceschi L, Koller B, Ryder CD, Tarchini R, Van de Weg E, Gessler C (2002) Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Mol Breeding 10:217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Zheng X, Potter D, Hu C, Teng Y (2012) Genetic diversity and population structure of Pyrus calleryana (Rosaceae) in Zhejiang Province, China. Biochem Syst Ecol 45:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu J, Sun P, Zheng X, Potter D, Li K, Hu C, Teng Y (2013) Genetic structure and phylogeography of Pyrus pashia (Rosaceae) in Yunnan Province, China, revealed by chloroplast DNA analyses. Tree Genet Genomes 9:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin MA, Mattioni C, Molina JR, Alvarez JB, Cherubini M, Herrera MA, Villani F, Martin LM (2012) Landscape genetic structure of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Spain. Tree Genet Genomes 8:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 19:153–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Potts SM, Han Y, Khan MA, Kushad MM, Rayburn AL, Korban SS (2012) Genetic diversity and characterization of a core collection of Malus germplasm using simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:827–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards CM, Volk GM, Reilley AA, Henk AD, Lockwood DR, Reeves PA, Forsline PL (2009) Genetic diversity and population structure in Malus sieversii, a wild progenitor species of domesticated apple. Tree Genet Genomes 5:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rubtsov GA (1944) Geographical distribution of the genus Pyrus and trends and factors in its evolution. Am Nat 78:358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takezaki N, Nei M (2008) Empirical tests of the reliability of phylogenetic trees constructed with microsatellite DNA. Genetics 178:385–392PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teng YW, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Itai A (2001) Genetic relationships of pear cultivars in Xinjiang, China as measured by RAPD markers. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 76:771–779Google Scholar
  36. Teng YW, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Itai A (2002) Genetic relationship of Pyrus species and cultivars native to East Asia revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA makers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127:262–270Google Scholar
  37. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills D, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Treuren R, Van Soest L, Van Hintum TJ (2001) Marker-assisted rationalisation of genetic resource collections: a case study in flax using AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 103:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Volk GM, Richards CM, Henk AD, Reilley AA, Bassil NV, Postman JD (2006) Diversity of wild Pyrus communis based on microsatellite analyses. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:408–417Google Scholar
  40. Wuyun T, Ma T, Uematsu C, Katayama H (2013) A phylogenetic network of wild ussurian pears (Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim.) in China revealed by hypervariable regions of chloroplast DNA. Tree Genet Genomes 9:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T, Ban Y, Matsuta N (2002a) Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T, Ban Y, Matsuta N (2002b) Genetic linkage maps constructed by using an interspecific cross between Japanese and European pears. Theor Appl Genet 106:9–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yao LH, Zheng XY, Cai DY, Gao YA, Wang K, Cao YF, Teng YW (2010) Exploitation of Malus EST-SSRs and the utility in evaluation of genetic diversity in Malus and Pyrus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yu DJ, Lu LD, Gu CZ, Guan KJ, Jiang WF (1986) Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae 38:367–370Google Scholar
  45. Zhang Q, Li J, Zhao YB, Korban SS, Han YP (2012) Evaluation of genetic diversity in Chinese wild apple species along with apple cultivars using SSR markers. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zheng XY, Hu CY, Spooner D, Liu J, Cao JS, Teng YW (2011) Molecular evolution of Adh and LEAFY and the phylogenetic utility of their introns in Pyrus (Rosaceae). BMC Evol Biol 11:255PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Zong
    • 1
  • Ping Sun
    • 1
  • Jing Liu
    • 1
  • Xiaoyan Yue
    • 1
  • Kunming Li
    • 2
  • Yuanwen Teng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Horticulture, the State Agricultural Ministry Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Growth, Development of Quality ImprovementZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Institute of Horticulture, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural SciencesKunming CityChina

Personalised recommendations