Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 434, Issue 1–2, pp 93–105 | Cite as

Effect of surfactants and leaf surface morphology on the evaporation time and coverage area of ZnIDHA droplets

  • Karolina Januszkiewicz
  • Anika Mrozek-NiećkoEmail author
  • Jacek Różański
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

The aim of the study was to determine the effects of the addition of surfactants to ZnIDHA fertilizer on the area of leaf coverage and water evaporation time taking into account the morphology of leaf blades. The effect of three surfactants (polyglucoside, alcohol EO (ethylene oxide) and trisiloxane) on the size of the leaf coverage area and evaporation time was compared.

Methods

Adaxial leaf surfaces of maize (Zea mays L. `Wilga`), wheat (Triticum aestivum `Adana-99`) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L. `F1`) were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy. The contact angle for aqueous ZnIDHA solutions with and without the addition of surfactants was determined. Measurements of droplet evaporation time and area of leaf coverage were conducted at the relative humidity of 60±1%.

Results

The adaxial surfaces of wheat and rapeseed leaves used in the study can be classified as highly non-wettable, whereas maize leaves are no-wettable. Out of the surfactants under study, the largest leaf coverage area was observed when adding the trisiloxane surfactant. Regardless of the surfactant used, the leaf coverage area decreased and the evaporation time increased for fertilizer droplets applied to the maize, rapeseed and wheat leaves.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the addition of surfactants to the fertilizer solution increases the wettability of the adaxial leaf surface and induces a strong capillary effect which determines the direction of spread of fertilizer droplets. In addition to the amount of trichomes and waxes, also the capillary effect has a significant impact on water evaporation time and the area of leaf coverage by fertilizer droplets.

Keywords

Morphology leaf Surfactant Contact angle Foliar fertilizer ZnIDHA Wettability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support of Ministry of Science and High Education (Poland) is gratefully acknowledged (Grant 03/32/DPB/0802).

We would like to thank Adam Nawrocki (PPC ADOB Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.) for financial support during this study.

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3785_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 2035 kb)

References

  1. Alexandridis P, Munshi SZ, Gu Z (2011) Evaporation of water from structured surfactant solutions. Ind Eng Chem res 50:580–589.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100261u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asmus E, Popp C, Friedmann AA, Arand K, Riederer M (2016) Water sorption isotherms of surfactants: a tool to evaluate humectancy. J Agric Food Chem 64(26):5310–5316.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes GT (2008) The potential for monolayers to reduce the evaporation of water from large water storages. Agr Water Manage 95(4):339–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Theisem I, Wilhelmi H (1998) Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot J Linn Soc 126:237–260.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.998.tb02529.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu S, Luthra J, Nigam KDP (2002) The effects of surfactants on adhesion, spreading, and retention of herbicide droplet on the surface of the leaves and seeds. J Environ Sci Health B37(4):331–344.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PFC-120004474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beattie GA, Marcell LM (2002) Effect of alterations in cuticular wax biosynthesis on the physicochemical properties and topography of maize leaf surfaces. Plant Cell Environ 25:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00804.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg JC (2010) An introduction to interface and colloids: the bridge to the nanoscience. WorldScientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer CA, Nuñez CI (2007) Patterns of leaf wettability along an extreme moisture gradient in western Patagonia, Argentina. Int J Plant Sci 168(5):555–562.  https://doi.org/10.1086/513468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churaev NV, Esipova NE, Hill RM, Sobolev VD, Starov VM, Zorin ZM (2001) The superspreading effect of trisiloxane surfactant solutions. Langmuir 17:1338–1348.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la000789r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conn KL, Tewari JP (1989) Ultrastructure of Epicuticular wax in canola. Z Naturforsch C 44(7–8):705–711.  https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1989-7-825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Damato TC, Carrasco LDM, Carmona-Ribeiro AM, Luiz RV, Godoy R, Petri DFS (2017) The interactions between surfactants and the epicuticular wax on soybean or weed leaves: maximal crop protection with minimal wax solubilization. Crop Prot 91:57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decaro RA, Decaro Junior ST, Costa Ferreira M (2016) Deposit of pesticides without and with adjuvants on citrus seedlings following different intervals of artificial rain. Crop Prot 46:13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150064 Google Scholar
  13. Erbil HY, Cansoy CE (2009) Range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter equations for superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 25(23):14135–14145.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la902098a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fageria NK, Barbosa Filho MP, Moreira A, Gyumarães CM (2009) Foliar fertilization of crop plants. J Plant Nutr 32:1044–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160902872826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández V, Guzman P, Peirce CAE, McBeath TM, Khayet M, McLaughlin MJ (2014) Effect of wheat phosphorus status on leaf surface properties and permeability to foliar-applied phosphorus. Plant Soil 384:7–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2052-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández V, Khayet M (2015) Evaluation of the surface free energy of plant surfaces: toward standardizing the procedure. Front Plant Sci 6:510.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández V, Khayet M, Montero-Prado P, Heredia-Guerrero JA, Liakopoulos G, Karabourniotis G, Río V, Domínguez E, Tacchini I, Nerín C, Val J, Heredia A (2011) New insights into the properties of pubescent surfaces: peach fruit as a model. Plant Physiol 156:2098–2108.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.176305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernàndez V, Scotiropoulos T, Brown P (2013) Foliar fertilization. Scientific principles and field practices. International Fertilizer Industry Association, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaskin RE, Holloway PJ (1992) Some physiochemical factors influencing foliar uptake enhancement of glyphosatemono (isopropylammonium) by polyoxyethylene surfactants. Pestic Sci 34:195–206. doi:10..1002/ps.2780340303Google Scholar
  20. Gimenes MJ, Zhu H, Raetano CG, Oliveira RB (2013) Dispersion and evaporation of droplets amended with adjuvants on soybeans. Crop Prot 44:84–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gokhale SJ, Plawsky JL, Wayner PC (2005) Spreading, evaporation, and contact line dynamics of surfactant-laden microdrops. Langmuir 21:8188–8197.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la050603u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green J, Crane J, Li Y, Sanford R, Rodriquez O (1999) Preliminary results on the effectiveness of two organosilicone adjuvants plus iron to correct leaf iron chlorosis of containerized carambola (Averrhoa Carambola) trees. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 112:176–178Google Scholar
  23. Gutiérrez G, Benito JM, Coca J, Pazos C (2010) Vacuum evaporation of surfactant solutions and oil-in-water emulsions. Chem Eng J 162:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall RH, Chapple A, Downer RA, Kirchner LM, Thacker JRM (1993) Pesticide application as affected by spray modifiers. Pest Manag Sci 38:123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2780380207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanba YT, Moriya A, Kimura K (2004) Effect of leaf surface wetness and wettability on photosynthesis in bean and pea. Plant Cell Environ 27:413–421.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2004.01154.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hazen JL (2000) Adjuvants – terminology, classification and chemistry. Weed Technol 14:773–784. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0773:ATCAC}2.0.CO:2Google Scholar
  27. Ivanova N, Starov V, Johnson D, Hilal N, Rubio R (2009) Spreading of aqueous solutions of trisiloxanes and conventional surfactants over PTFE AF coated silicone wafers. Langmuir 25:3564–3570.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la803679y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ivanova N, Starov V, Rubio R, Ritacco H, Hilal N, Johnson D (2010) Critical wetting concentrations of trisiloxane surfactants. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 354:143–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.07.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khayet M, Fernández V (2012) Estimation of the solubility parameters of model plant surfaces and agrochemicals: a valuable tool for understanding plant surface interactions. Theor Biol Med Model 9:45.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-9-45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knezevic S, Datta A, Scott J, Charvat LD (2010) Application timing and adjuvant type affected saflufenacil efficacy on selected broadleaf weeds. Crop Prot 29:94–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W (2008) Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of plant surfaces. Soft Matter 4:1943–1963.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b804854a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Konrad W, Ebner M, Traiser C, Roth-Nebelsick A (2012) Leaf surface wettability and implications for drop shedding and evaporation from forest canopies. Pure Appl Geophys 169:835–845.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0330-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lafuma A, Quéré D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater 2(7):457–460.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin H, Zhou H, Xu L, Zhu H, Huang H (2016) Effect of surfactant concentration on the spreading properties of pesticide droplets on Eucalyptus leaves. Biosyst Eng 143:42–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mel AA, Usano-Alemany J, Carus Guedes JV, Hunsche M (2015) Impact of tank-mix adjuvants on deposit formation, cuticular penetration and rain-induced removal of chlorantraniliprole. Crop Prot 78:253–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Papadopoulos P, Mammen L, Deng X, Vollmer D, Butt HJ (2013) How superhydrophobicity breaks down. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 9:3254–3258.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218673110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peirce CAE, McBeath TM, Fernández V, McLaughlin MJ (2014) Wheat leaf properties affecting the absorption and subsequent translocation of foliar-applied phosphoric acid fertilizer. Plant Soil 384:37–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2245-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peirce CAE, Piest C, McBeath TM, McLaughlin MJ (2016) Uptake of phosphorus from surfactant solutions by wheat leaves: spreading kinetics, wetted area, and drying time. Soft Matter 12:209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sm01380a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Radulovic J, Sefiane K, Shanahan MER (2010) Dynamics of trisiloxane wetting: effects of diffusion and surface hydrophobicity. J Phys Chem C 114:13620–13629.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp910729c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramsey RJL, Stephenson GR, Hall JC (2005) A review of the effects of humidity, humectants, and surfactant composition on the absorption and efficacy of highly water-soluble herbicides. Pest Biochem Physiol 82:162–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Revilla P, Fernández V, Álvarez-Iglesias L, Medina ET, Cavero J (2006) Leaf physico-chemical and physiological properties of maize (Zea mays L.) populations from different origins. Plant Physiol Biochem 170:319–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.017 Google Scholar
  42. Rogiers SY, Whitelaw-Weckert M, Radovanonic-Tesic M, Greer LA, White RG, Steel CC (2005) Effect of spray adjuvants on grape (Vitis vinifera) berry microflora, epicuticular wax and susceptibility to infection by Botrytis cinerea. Australas Plant Pathol 34:221–228.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AP05031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sæbø A, Popek R, Nawrot B, Hanslin HM, Gawronska H, Gawronski SW (2012) Plant species differences in particulate matter accumulation on leaf surfaces. Sci Total Environ 427–428:347–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Semenov S, Trybala A, Agogo H, Kovalchuk N, Ortega F, Rubio RG, Starov VM, Velarde MG (2013) Evaporation of droplets of surfactant solutions. Langmuir 29:10028–10036.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la401578v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schroer S, Ehlers XY, Ehlers RU (2005) Evaluation of adjuvants for foliar application of Steinernema carpocapsae against larvae of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Nematol 7:37–44.  https://doi.org/10.1163/1568541054192126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sefiane K (2006) The coupling between evaporation and adsorbed surfactant accumulation and its effect on the wetting and spreading behaviour of volatile drops on a hot surface. J Pet Sci Eng 51:238–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh D, Singh M (2008) Absorption and translocation of glyphosate with conventional and organosilicone adjuvants. Weed Biol Manag 8:104–111.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2008.00282.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soboleva OA, Summ BD (2003) The kinetics of dewetting of hydrophobic surfaces during the evaporation of surfactant solution drops. Colloid J 65:89–93.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022379210765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stainier C, Destain MF, Schiffers B, Lebeau F (2006) Droplet size spectra and drift effect of two phenmedipham formulations and four adjuvants mixtures. Crop Prot 25:1238–1243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun JS, Policello GA, Paccione MA (2003) Determination of organosilicone surfactant phytotoxicity for selected vegetable species. In Volgas GC, downer RA, Lopez HB, pesticide formulations and application systems. VA: ASTM, NorfolkGoogle Scholar
  51. Svitova T, Hill RM, Yu S, Stuermer A, Yakubov G (1998) Wetting and interfacial transitions in dilute solutions of trisiloxane surfactants. Langmuir 14:5023–5031.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la980072s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Svitova T, Hoffmann H, Hill RM (1996) Trisiloxane surfactants: surface/interfacial tension dynamics and spreading on hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 12:1712–1721.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la9505172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor P (2011) The wetting of leaf surface. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 16:326–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2010.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Urrego-Pereira YF, Martínez-Cob A, Fernàndez V, Cavero J (2013) Daytime sprinkler irrigation effects on net photosynthesis of maize and alfalfa. Agron J 105:1515–1528.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Zyl SA, Brink J-C, Calitz FJ, Fourie PH (2010) Effect of adjuvants on deposition efficiency of fenhexamid sprays applied to chardonnay grapevine foliage. Crop Prot 29:843–852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang H, Shi H, Li Y, Wang Y (2014) The effects of leaf roughness, surface free energy and work of adhesion on leaf water drop adhesion. PLoS One 9(9):e107062.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang S, Jiang L (2007) Definition of superhydrophobic states. Adv Mater 19:3423–3424.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang SJ, Wang HJ, Li C, Zhong XM, Huang H, Zhou YJ (2016) Adsorption characteristics of droplets applied on non-smooth leaf surface of typical crops. Int J Agric Biol Eng 9(1):35–41.  https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20160901.1022 Google Scholar
  59. Xu L, Zhu H, Ozkan HE, Bagley WE, Krause CR (2011) Droplet evaporation and spread on waxy and hairy leaves associated with type and concentration of adjuvants. Pest Manag Sci 67:842–851.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xu L, Zhu H, Ozkan HE, Thistle HW (2010) Evaporation rate and development of wetted area of water droplets with and without surfactant at different locations on waxy leaf surfaces. Biosyst Eng 106:58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yu Y, Zhu H, Frantz JM, Reding ME, Chan KC, Ozkan HE (2009) Evaporation and coverage area of pesticide droplets on hairy and waxy leaves. Biosyst Eng 104:324–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou Z-L, Cao C, Cao L-D, Zheng L, Xu J, Li F-M, Huang Q-L (2017) Evaporation kinetics of surfactant solution droplets on rice (Oryza sativa) leaves. PLoS One 12(5):e0176870.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PPC ADOB Sp. z o.o. Sp. kPoznanPoland
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering and Equipment, Faculty of Chemical TechnologyPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations