Plant and Soil

, Volume 434, Issue 1–2, pp 107–123 | Cite as

Variation in grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrition of irrigated rice cultivars grown at fertile and low-fertile soils

  • D. S. Kekulandara
  • D. N. Sirisena
  • P. C. G. Bandaranayake
  • G. Samarasinghe
  • M. Wissuwa
  • L. D. B. SuriyagodaEmail author
Regular Article


Background and aims

Rice cultivars bred for fertile soils may not be the best suited to nutrient limited environments. Therefore, rice cultivars suited to sustain productivity in low-fertile soils and their adaptive mechanisms for success need to be identified.


Field experiments were conducted in fertile and low-fertile sites for two and five seasons, respectively, using forty four widely grown rice cultivars in Sri Lanka. Growth and tissue nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations were measured.

Key results

Plant biomass and shoot- N, P and K contents were reduced by 41, 54, 74 and 36% under low soil fertility, respectively, while crop duration was extended by 12 days. Relationships between grain dry weight (DW- g plant−1) of a cultivar, and seed N, P and K concentrations were negative (P < 0.05) at the fertile site, and this was true only for N at the low-fertile site. Seed- P and K concentrations at the low-fertile site reached to minimum and stable concentrations (1.45 and 1.61 mg g−1, respectively). Irrespective of the soil fertility status, grain DW of rice cultivars was positively correlated with shoot N, P and K contents (mg plant−1) and their accumulation rates (mg plant−1 day−1). Moreover, grain DW of a rice cultivar at the low-fertile site could be explained by shoot P content, seed P concentration and P-harvest index through regression (R2 = 0.74, significant at P < 0.05). Cultivars; Bw451, Bg379–2, H4, At362, Ld408, Bg454, Bw400, At353, Bg380, At402, Bw452, Ld365, and Bw453 had higher grain DW than other cultivars at the low-fertile site.


Rice cultivars with higher capacity to accumulate N, P and K (mg plant−1 day−1), and longer crop duration ensured higher grain DW while seed P and K concentrations are not good indicators to select promising rice cultivars to low-fertile soils with severe P limitation.


Adaptation Breeding Nutrient uptake Plant traits Soil fertility Sustainability 



Authors appreciate the financial support from the National Science Foundation, Sri Lanka through the grant NSF/AG/14/01, technical assistance provided by G Wijesuriya, WMN Wanninayake and S Mayamulla, and anonymous reviewers for the comments to improve an earlier version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3663_MOESM1_ESM.docx (284 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 284 kb)


  1. Asai H, Saito K, Samson B, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Shiraiwa T, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Horie T (2009) Yield response of indica and tropical japonica genotypes to soil fertility conditions under rainfed uplands in northern Laos. Field Crop Res 112:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atlin GN, Lafitte HR, Tao D, Laza M, Amante M, Courtois B (2006) Developing rice cultivars for high-fertility upland systems in the Asian tropics. Field Crop Res 97:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dobermann A, Fairhurst T (2000) Rice: nutrient disorders and nutrient management, IRRI, Philippines, PPI, USA and PPIC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  4. Fukai S, Inthapanya P, Blamey FPC, Khunthasuvon S (1999) Genotypic variation in rice grown in low fertile soils and drought-prone, rainfed lowland environments. Field Crop Res 64:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haefele SM, Wopereis MCS, Ndiaye MK, Barro SE, Ould Isselmou M (2003) Internal nutrient efficiencies, fertilizer recovery rates and indigenous nutrient supply of irrigated lowland rice in Sahelian West Africa. Field Crop Res 80:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haefele SM, Wopereis MCS, Schloebohm AM, Wiechmann H (2004) Long-term fertility experiments for irrigated rice in the west African Sahel: effect on soil characteristics. Field Crop Res 85:61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haefele SM, Nelson A, Hijmans RJ (2014) Soil quality and constraints in global rice production. Geoderma 235:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haefele SM, Kato Y, Singh S (2016) Climate ready rice: augmenting drought tolerance with best management practices. Field Crop Res 190:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horie T, Shiraiwa T, Homma K, Katsura K, Maeda S, Yoshida H (2005) Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s? Plant Prod Sci 8:259–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inthapanya P, Sipaseuth Sihavong P, Sihathep V, Chanphengsay M, Fukai S, Basnayake J (2000) Genotypic performance under fertilised and non-fertilised conditions in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crop Res 65:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Katsura K, Tsujimoto Y, Oda M, Matsushima K-i, Inusah B, Dogbe W, Sakagami J-I (2016) Genotype-by-environment interaction analysis of rice (Oryza spp.) yield in a floodplain ecosystem in West Africa. Eur J Agron 73:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kekulandara D, Bandaranayake P, Sirisena D, Samarasinghe W, Suriyagoda L (2017) Temporal tillering behavior of Sri Lankan elite rice varieties in response to phosphorus availability. Trop Agric Res 28:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitson RE, Mellon MG (1944) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus as molybdivanadophosphoric acid. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 16:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koutroubas SD, Ntanos DA (2003) Genotypic differences for grain yield and nitrogen utilization in Indica and japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crop Res 83:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu X, Xu S, Zhang J, Ding Y, Li G, Wang S, Liu Z, Tang S, Ding C, Chen L (2016) Effect of continuous reduction of nitrogen application to a rice-wheat rotation system in the middle-lower Yangtze River region (2013–2015). Field Crop Res 196:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lynch JP (2011) Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol 156:1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mayamulla S, Weerarathne LVY, Marambe B, Sirisena DN, Suriyagoda LDB (2017) Variation in seed nutrient content, seedling growth and yield of rice varieties grown in a paddy field without application of fertilisers for forty years. Crop Pasture Sci 68:337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelson DW, Sommers L (1980) Total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant tissues. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 63:770–778Google Scholar
  19. Peng S, Bouman BAM (2007) Prospects for genetic improvement to increase lowland rice yields with less water and nitrogen. In: Spiertz JHJ, Struik PC, van Laar HH (eds) Scale and complexity in plant systems research: gene–plant–crop relations. Springer, New York, pp 251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng S, Cassman KG, Virmani SS, Sheehy J, Khush GS (1999) Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Sci 39:1552–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peng S, Huang J, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong X, Centeno GS, Khush GS, Cassman KG (2004) Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9971–9975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peng S, Buresh RJ, Huang J, Yang J, Zou Y, Zhong X, Wang G, Zhang F (2006) Strategies for overcoming low agronomic nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice systems in China. Field Crop Res 96:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poussin JC, Wopereis MCS, Debouzie D, Maeght JL (2003) Determinants of irrigated rice yield in the Senegal River valley. Eur J Agron 19:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pratt PF (1965) Potassium. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1023–1031Google Scholar
  25. Raboin L-M, Razafimahafaly AHD, Rabenjarisoa MB, Rabary B, Dusserre J, Becquer T (2016) Improving the fertility of tropical acid soils: liming versus biochar application? A long term comparison in the highlands of Madagascar. Field Crop Res 199:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rahman S, Parkinson RJ (2007) Productivity and soil fertility relationships in rice production systems, Bangladesh. Agric Syst 92:318–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodenburg J, Zwart SJ, Kiepe P, Narteh LT, Dogbe W, Wopereis MCS (2014) Sustainable rice production in African inland valleys: seizing regional potentials through local approaches. Agric Syst 123:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rose TJ, Pariasca-Tanaka J, Rose MT, Fukuta Y, Wissuwa M (2010) Genotypic variation in grain phosphorus concentration, and opportunities to improve P-use efficiency in rice. Field Crop Res 119:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saito K, Futakuchi K (2009) Performance of diverse upland rice cultivars in low and high soil fertility conditions in West Africa. Field Crop Res 111:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SAS (2005) Statistical analysis systems. Release 9. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  31. Somaweera KATN, Suriyagoda LDB, Sirisena DN, De Costa WAJM (2016) Accumulation and partitioning of biomass, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium among different tissues during the life cycle of rice grown under different water management regimes. Plant Soil 401:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Somaweera K, Sirisena D, De Costa W, Suriyagoda L (2017a) Age-related morphological and physiological responses of irrigated rice to declined soil phosphorus and potassium availability. Paddy Water Environ 15:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Somaweera KATN, Suriyagoda LDB, Sirisena DN, De Costa WAJM (2017b) Growth, root adaptations, phosphorus and potassium nutrition of rice when grown under the co-limitations of phosphorus, potassium and moisture. J Plant Nutr 40:795–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sui B, Feng X, Tian G, Hu X, Shen Q, Guo S (2013) Optimizing nitrogen supply increases rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency by regulating yield formation factors. Field Crop Res 150:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suriyagoda LDB, Sirisena DN, Somaweera KATN, Dissanayake A, De Costa WAJM, Lambers H (2017) Incorporation of dolomite reduces iron toxicity, enhances growth and yield, and improves phosphorus and potassium nutrition in lowland rice (Oryza sativa L). Plant Soil 410:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vandamme E, Wissuwa M, Rose T, Dieng I, Drame KN, Fofana M, Senthilkumar K, Venuprasad R, Jallow D, Segda Z, Suriyagoda L, Sirisena D, Kato Y, Saito K (2016) Genotypic variation in grain P loading across diverse Rice growing environments and implications for field P balances. Front Plant Sci 7:1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Demeyer A, Pauwels J (1999) Manual for the soil chemistry and fertility laboratory: analytical methods for soils and plants equipment, and management of consumables, Gent UniversiteitGoogle Scholar
  38. Weerakoon WMW, Mutunayake MMP, Bandara C, Rao AN, Bhandari DC, Ladha JK (2011) Direct-seeded rice culture in Sri Lanka: lessons from farmers. Field Crop Res 121:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wijnhoud JD, Konboon Y, Lefroy RDB (2003) Nutrient budgets: sustainability assessment of rainfed lowland rice-based systems in Northeast Thailand. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wissuwa M, Kretzschmar T, Rose TJ (2016) From promise to application: root traits for enhanced nutrient capture in rice breeding. J Exp Bot 67:3605–3615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wonprasaid S, Khunthasuvon S, Sittisuang P, Fukai S (1996) Performance of contrasting rice cultivars selected for rainfed lowland conditions in relation to soil fertility and water availability. Field Crop Res 47:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Worou ON, Gaiser T, Saito K, Goldbach H, Ewert F (2013) Spatial and temporal variation in yield of rainfed lowland rice in inland valley as affected by fertilizer application and bunding in north-West Benin. Agric Water Manag 126:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang Y-H, Fan J-B, Zhang Y-L, Wang D-S, Huang Q-W, Shen Q-R (2007) N accumulation and translocation in four japonica rice cultivars at different N rates. Pedosphere 17:792–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zörb C, Senbayram M, Peiter E (2014) Potassium in agriculture – status and perspectives. J Plant Physiol 171:656–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgricultureRice research and Development InstituteIbbagamuwaSri Lanka
  2. 2.Agricultural Biotechnology CentreUniversity of PeradeniyaKandySri Lanka
  3. 3.Department of AgriculturePlant Genetic Resource CentrePeradeniyaSri Lanka
  4. 4.Crop Production and Environment DivisionJapan International Research Centre for Agricultural ScienceIbarakiJapan
  5. 5.Department of Crop Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of PeradeniyaKandySri Lanka
  6. 6.School of Biological Sciences and Institute of AgricultureThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations