Variation in grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrition of irrigated rice cultivars grown at fertile and low-fertile soils
- 368 Downloads
Background and aims
Rice cultivars bred for fertile soils may not be the best suited to nutrient limited environments. Therefore, rice cultivars suited to sustain productivity in low-fertile soils and their adaptive mechanisms for success need to be identified.
Field experiments were conducted in fertile and low-fertile sites for two and five seasons, respectively, using forty four widely grown rice cultivars in Sri Lanka. Growth and tissue nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations were measured.
Plant biomass and shoot- N, P and K contents were reduced by 41, 54, 74 and 36% under low soil fertility, respectively, while crop duration was extended by 12 days. Relationships between grain dry weight (DW- g plant−1) of a cultivar, and seed N, P and K concentrations were negative (P < 0.05) at the fertile site, and this was true only for N at the low-fertile site. Seed- P and K concentrations at the low-fertile site reached to minimum and stable concentrations (1.45 and 1.61 mg g−1, respectively). Irrespective of the soil fertility status, grain DW of rice cultivars was positively correlated with shoot N, P and K contents (mg plant−1) and their accumulation rates (mg plant−1 day−1). Moreover, grain DW of a rice cultivar at the low-fertile site could be explained by shoot P content, seed P concentration and P-harvest index through regression (R2 = 0.74, significant at P < 0.05). Cultivars; Bw451, Bg379–2, H4, At362, Ld408, Bg454, Bw400, At353, Bg380, At402, Bw452, Ld365, and Bw453 had higher grain DW than other cultivars at the low-fertile site.
Rice cultivars with higher capacity to accumulate N, P and K (mg plant−1 day−1), and longer crop duration ensured higher grain DW while seed P and K concentrations are not good indicators to select promising rice cultivars to low-fertile soils with severe P limitation.
KeywordsAdaptation Breeding Nutrient uptake Plant traits Soil fertility Sustainability
Authors appreciate the financial support from the National Science Foundation, Sri Lanka through the grant NSF/AG/14/01, technical assistance provided by G Wijesuriya, WMN Wanninayake and S Mayamulla, and anonymous reviewers for the comments to improve an earlier version of the manuscript.
- Dobermann A, Fairhurst T (2000) Rice: nutrient disorders and nutrient management, IRRI, Philippines, PPI, USA and PPIC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Nelson DW, Sommers L (1980) Total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant tissues. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 63:770–778Google Scholar
- Pratt PF (1965) Potassium. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1023–1031Google Scholar
- SAS (2005) Statistical analysis systems. Release 9. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
- Vandamme E, Wissuwa M, Rose T, Dieng I, Drame KN, Fofana M, Senthilkumar K, Venuprasad R, Jallow D, Segda Z, Suriyagoda L, Sirisena D, Kato Y, Saito K (2016) Genotypic variation in grain P loading across diverse Rice growing environments and implications for field P balances. Front Plant Sci 7:1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Demeyer A, Pauwels J (1999) Manual for the soil chemistry and fertility laboratory: analytical methods for soils and plants equipment, and management of consumables, Gent UniversiteitGoogle Scholar