Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 406, Issue 1–2, pp 173–185 | Cite as

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to overyielding by enhancing crop biomass while suppressing weed biomass in intercropping systems

  • Xu Qiao
  • ShuiKuan Bei
  • HaiGang Li
  • Peter Christie
  • FuSuo Zhang
  • JunLing Zhang
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Intercropping often produces more biomass than the average of the corresponding monocultures, particularly in sustainable, low-input agriculture. Characterizing plant-plant interactions is fundamental for a better understanding of the ecological functioning of intercropping. However, there is little information on whether mycorrhizal networks exhibit different effects upon intra- and interspecific plant interactions in intercropping systems.

Methods

Microcosms with one inner and three outer compartments were used. The inner compartment was separated from the outer compartments by a 30-μm nylon mesh or a solid barrier or remained open to allow full interactions between plants grown in the different compartments, creating three treatments, namely −Roots−CMNs (solid barrier), −Roots+CMNs (mesh), and +Roots+CMNs (no barrier). Either faba bean (Vicia faba) or maize (Zea mays) was grown as the donor plant in the inner compartment. Maize was combined with maize, wheat (Triticum aestivum) or the weed species foxtail (Setaria viridis) as the neighboring plant species. Faba bean was combined with faba bean, maize, or foxtail. The low-P soil was inoculated with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Funneliformis mosseae or remained uninoculated.

Results

In the absence of AMF, plant growth was restricted by P deficiency and root interactions did not significantly affect plant-plant interactions. The presence of AMF enhanced plant biomass (maize by 104.5 %, faba bean by 61.6 %) and nutrient (N and P) uptake. Significant overyielding occurred in treatments where roots and hyphal networks of all plant species intermingled. The weed (foxtail) was suppressed by interspecific interactions while maize and faba bean benefitted from a mycorrhizal network and the presence of intermingling roots.

Conclusions

In low-P soils, mycorrhizal networks contribute to overyielding in intercropping by enhancing the biomass and nutrient uptake of the mycorrhiza-dependent plant species. The biomass depression of weed species by AMF and/or root interactions may have ecological implications in weed control in intercropping systems.

Keywords

Mycorrhizal networks Phosphorus Intercropping Faba bean Maize Setaria viridis Wheat 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the International Cooperation and Exchanges Projects of NSFC (31210103906), the National Basic Research Program (973-2015CB150405), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31272251 and 31421092). The AMF inoculum was kindly provided by Professor Youshan Wang, Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Research, China.

Supplementary material

11104_2016_2863_MOESM1_ESM.doc (43 kb)
Table S1 (DOC 43 kb)
11104_2016_2863_MOESM2_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Table S2 (DOC 60 kb)
11104_2016_2863_MOESM3_ESM.doc (75 kb)
Table S3 (DOC 75 kb)
11104_2016_2863_MOESM4_ESM.doc (76 kb)
Table S4 (DOC 75 kb)
11104_2016_2863_MOESM5_ESM.doc (43 kb)
Fig. S1 (DOC 43 kb)

References

  1. Ayres RL, Gange AC, Aplin DM (2006) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and intraspecific competition affect size, and size inequality, of Plantago lanceolata L. J Ecol 94:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babikova Z, Gilbert L, Bruce TJA, Birkett M, Caulfield JC, Woodcock C, Pickett JA, Johnson D (2013) Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighboring plants of aphid attack. Ecol Lett 16:835–843CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barto EK, Hilker M, Müller F, Mohney BK, Weidenhamer JD, Rillig MC (2011) The fungal fast lane: common mycorrhizal networks extend bioactive zones of allelochemicals in soils. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027195 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Daisog H, Sbrana C, Cristani C, Moonen AC, Giovannetti M, Bàrberi P (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi shift competitive relationships among crop and weed species. Plant Soil 353:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Kroon H, Hendriks M, van Ruijven J, Ravenek J, Padilla FM, Jongejans E, Visser EJW, Mommer L (2012) Root responses to nutrients and soil biota: drivers of species coexistence and ecosystem productivity. J Ecol 100:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fixen PE, Grove JH (1990) Soil testing and plant analysis, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  7. Francis R, Read DJ (1995) Mutualism and antagonism in the mycorrhizal symbiosis, with special reference to impacts on plant community structure. Can J Bot 73:1301–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao LL, Delp G, Smith SE (2001) Colonization patterns in a mycorrhiza-defective mutant tomato vary with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 151:477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaume A, Mächler F, De León C, Narro L, Frossard E (2001) Low-P tolerance by maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes: significance of root growth, and organic acids and acid phosphatase root exudation. Plant Soil 228:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghosh PK, Mohanty M, Bandyopadhyay KK, Painuli DK, Misra AK (2006) Growth, competition, yield advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India I. Effect of subsoiling. Field Crop Res 96:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gosling P, Mead A, Proctor M, Hammond JP, Bending GD (2013) Contrasting arbuscular mycorrhizal communities colonizing different host plants show a similar response to a soil phosphorus concentration gradient. New Phytol 198:546–556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES (2005) Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant Soil 274:237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C et al (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hodge A, Campbell CD, Fitter AH (2001) An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Lett Nat 413:297–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inal A, Gunes A, Zhang F, Cakmak I (2007) Peanut/maize intercropping induced changes in rhizosphere and nutrient concentrations in shoots. Plant Physiol Biochem 45:350–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA (1997) Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum. New Phytol 135:575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li L, Sun J, Zhang F, Li X, Rengel Z, Yang S (2001a) Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crop Res 71:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li L, Sun J, Zhang F, Li X, Yang S, Rengel Z (2001b) Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crop Res 71:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li L, Tang CX, Rengel Z, Zhang FS (2003a) Chickpea facilitates phosphorus uptake by intercropped wheat from an organic phosphorus source. Plant Soil 248:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li L, Zhang F, Li X, Christie P, Sun J, Yang S, Tang C (2003b) Interspecific facilitation of nutrient uptake by intercropped maize and faba bean. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 65:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li L, Li S, Sun J, Zhou L, Bao X, Zhang H, Zhang F (2007) Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus deficient soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:11192–11196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Li H, Shen J, Zhang F, Marschner P, Cawthray G, Rengel Z (2010) Phosphorus uptake and rhizosphere properties of intercropped and monocropped maize, faba bean, and white lupin in acidic soil. Biol Fertil Soils 46:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li H, Huang G, Meng Q, Ma L, Yuan L, Wang F, Zhang W, Cui Z, Shen J, Chen X, Jiang R, Zhang F (2011) Integrated soil and plant phosphorus management for crop and environment in China. A review. Plant Soil 349:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H, Zhang FS (2014) Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytol 203:63–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin G, McCormack ML, Guo D (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on plant competition and community structure. J Ecol 103:1224–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu XH (1994) The farming systems. China Agricultural University Press, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  27. Mariotte P, Meugnier C, Johnson D, Thébault A, Spiegelberger T, Buttler A (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the differences in competitiveness between dominant and subordinate plant species. Mycorrhiza 23:267–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Merrild MP, Ambus P, Rosendahl S, Jakobsen I (2013) Common arbuscular mycorrhizal networks amplify competition for phosphorus between seedlings and established plants. New Phytol 200:229–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nazeri NK, Lambers H, Tibbett M, Ryan MH (2014) Moderating mycorrhizas: arbuscular mycorrhizas modify rhizosphere chemistry and maintain plant phosphorus status within narrow boundaries. Plant Cell Environ 37:911–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips J, Hayman D (1970) Improved procedures for cleaning and staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55:158–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Postma JA, Lynch JP (2012) Complementarity in root architecture for nutrient uptake in ancient maize/bean and maize/bean/squash polycultures. Ann Bot 110:521–534CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Hayes JE (2000) Acid phosphomonoesterase and phytase activities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots and utilization of organic phosphorus substrates by seedlings grown in sterile culture. Plant Cell Environ 23:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rinaudo V, Bàrberi P, Giovanneti M, van der Heijden MGA (2010) Mycorrhizal fungi suppress aggressive agricultural weeds. Plant Soil 333:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2012) Maize–grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crop Res 136:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Elsevier, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  36. Song YY, Ye M, Li C, He X, Zhu-Salzman K, Wang RL, Su YJ, Luo SM, Zeng RS (2014) Hijacking common mycorrhizal networks for herbivore-induced defence signal transfer between tomato plants. Sci Rep. doi: 10.1038/srep03915 Google Scholar
  37. Teste FP, Simard SW, Durall DM, Guy RD, Berch SM (2010) Net carbon transfer between Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca seedlings in the field is influenced by soil disturbance. J Ecol 98:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Teste FP, Veneklaas EJ, Dixon KW, Lambers H (2014) Complementary plant nutrient-acquisition strategies promote growth of neighbor species. Funct Ecol 28(4):819–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van der Heijden MGA, Horton TR (2009) Socialism in soil? The importance of mycorrhizal fungal networks for facilitation in natural ecosystems. J Ecol 97:1139–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vandermeer J (1989) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veiga RS, Jansa J, Frossard E, van der Heijden MG (2011) Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds? PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027825 Google Scholar
  42. Veiga RS, Howard K, van der Heijden MG (2012) No evidence for allelopathic effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the non-host plant Stellaria media. Plant Soil 360:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagg C, Jansa J, Stadler M, Schmid B, van der Heijden MGA (2011) Mycorrhizal fungal identity and diversity relaxes plant-plant competition. Ecology 92:1303–1313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Walder F, Niemann H, Natarajan M, Lehmann MF, Boller T, Wiemken A (2012) Mycorrhizal networks: common goods of plants shared under unequal terms of trade. Plant Physiol 159:789–797CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang ZG, Jin X, Bao XG et al (2014) Intercropping enhances productivity and maintains the most soil fertility properties relative to sole cropping. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113984 Google Scholar
  46. Yan S, Du X, Wu F, Li L, Li C, Meng Z (2014) Proteomics insights into the basis of interspecific facilitation for maize (Zea mays) in faba bean (Vicia faba)/maize intercropping. J Proteomics 109:111–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Zabinski CA, Quinn L, Callaway RM (2002) Phosphorus uptake, not carbon transfer, explains arbuscular mycorrhizal enhancement of Centaurea maculosa in the presence of native grassland species. Funct Ecol 16:758–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang F, Li L (2003) Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 248:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang C, Postma JA, York LM, Lynch JP (2014) Root foraging elicits niche complementarity-dependent yield advantage in the ancient ‘three sisters’ (maize/bean/squash) polyculture. Ann Bot 114:1719–1733CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang D, Zhang C, Tang X, Li H, Zhang F, Rengel Z, Whalley WR, Davies WJ, Shen J (2015) Increased soil phosphorus availability induced by faba bean root exudation stimulates root growth and phosphorus uptake in neighbouring maize. New Phytol 209:823–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zuo YM, Zhang FS (2008) Effect of peanut mixed cropping with gramineous species on micronutrient concentrations and iron chlorosis of peanut plants grown in a calcareous soil. Plant Soil 306:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuo YM, Zhang FS, Li XL, Cao YP (2000) Studies on the improvement in iron nutrition of peanut by intercropping with maize on a calcareous soil. Plant Soil 220:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xu Qiao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • ShuiKuan Bei
    • 1
    • 2
  • HaiGang Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Christie
    • 1
    • 2
  • FuSuo Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • JunLing Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Centre for Resources, Environment and Food Security, College of Resources and Environmental SciencesChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil InteractionsMinistry of EducationBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Grain GroupsXinjiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesUrumqiChina
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming Systems in Desert Oasis RegionMinistry of AgricultureUrumqiChina
  5. 5.Department of Plant NutritionChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations