Volatiles from biofumigant plants have a direct effect on carpogenic germination of sclerotia and mycelial growth of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
- 739 Downloads
Sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum survive in soil and germinate to produce apothecia which release airborne ascospores. Current control methods rely predominantly on the use of fungicides to kill ascospores. The aim of this research was to identify potential biofumigation treatments which suppress sclerotial germination, providing a potential alternative and long-term approach to disease management.
Microcosm and in vitro experiments were conducted using dried and milled plant material from six different biofumigant crop plants to determine effects on carpogenic germination of sclerotia and mycelial growth of S. sclerotiorum.
All biofumigant plants significantly reduced germination of S. sclerotiorum sclerotia in the microcosm experiments, but were less effective against larger sclerotia. In vitro experiments showed a direct effect of biofumigant volatiles on both the mycelial growth of S. sclerotiorum, and carpogenic germination of sclerotia, where the most effective treatment was B. juncea ‘Vittasso’.
It was clear from this study that biofumigant crop plants have potential as part of an integrated disease management system for control of S. sclerotiorum. The microcosm experiments described here provide a straightforward and reliable screening method for evaluating different biofumigants for activity.
KeywordsSclerotinia sclerotiorum Biofumigation Glucosinolate Isothiocyanate Brassica
This work was carried out as part of a PhD studentship (CP80) funded by the Horticultural Development Company, UK. The author acknowledges assistance from Andrew Jukes and Julie Jones at Warwick Crop Centre for their assistance and guidance with HPLC analysis and statistical analysis, respectively.
- Akram A, Iqbal SM, Ahmed N, Iqbal U, Ghafoor A (2008) Morphological variability and mycelial compatibility among the isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum associated with stem rot of chickpea. Pak J Bot 40:2663–2668Google Scholar
- Antonious GF, Bomford M, Vincelli P (2009) Screening Brassica species for glucosinolate content. J Environ Sci Health 44:311–316Google Scholar
- Bomford M (2009) Biofumigation for soil health in organic high tunnel and conventional field vegetable production systems. Sustain Agric Res Educ. http://mysare.sare.org/mySARE/ProjectReport.aspx?do=viewRept&pn=LS06-185&y=2009&t=1. Accessed 30 Apr 2012
- Chew FS (1987) Biologically active natural products - potential use in agriculture. In: MJ Comstock (ed) ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, USAGoogle Scholar
- Clarkson JP, Phelps K, Whipps JA, Young CS, Smith JA, Watling M (2007) Forecasting sclerotinia disease on lettuce: a predictive model for carpogenic germination of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum sclerotia. Phytopathology 97:621–631Google Scholar
- Finney DJ (1971) Probit Analysis. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Geier B (2009) On-farm study results: biofumigation and soil solarization. Kentucky State University, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
- Gupta S, Sangha MK, Kaur G, Atwal AK, Banga S, Banga SS (2012) Variability for leaf and seed glucosinolate contents and profiles in a germplasm collection of the Brassica juncea. Biochem Anal Biochem 1:1–5Google Scholar
- Jones EE, Rabeendran N, Stewart A (2014) Biocontrol of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infection of cabbage by Coniothyrium minitans and Trichoderma spp. Biocontrol Science and Technology: 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2014.940847
- Kirkegaard JA, Gardner PA, Desmarchelier JM, Angus JF (1993) Biofumigation — using Brassica species to control pests and diseases in horticulture and agriculture. In: Wratten N, Mailer RJ (eds) 9th Australian research assembly on brassicas. Agricultural Research Institute, Wagga WaggaGoogle Scholar
- Kojima M, Oawa K (1971) Studies on the effect of isothiocyanates and their analogues on microorganisms. (I) Effects of isothiocyanates on the oxygen uptake of yeasts. J Ferment Technol 49:740–746Google Scholar
- Matheron ME, Porchas M (2008) Assessment of fungicides to manage Sclerotinia drop of lettuce in 2007. Vegetable ReportGoogle Scholar
- McQuilken M (2011) Control of Sclerotinia disease on carrots. HDC Factsheet 19/11Google Scholar
- Mithen RF (2001) Glucosinolates and their degradation products. Advances in Botanical Research. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Molina-Vargas LF (2013) Mechanism of action of isothiocyanates. A review. Agron Colomb 31:68–75Google Scholar
- Porter I, Pung H, Villalta O, Crnov R, Stewart A (2002) Development of biological controls for Sclerotinia diseases of horticultural crops in Australasia. 2nd Australasian lettuce Industry Conference, University of Queensland Gatton Campus.Google Scholar
- Rahmanpour S, Backhouse D, Nonhebel HM (2013) Toxicity of hydrolysis volatile products of Brassica plants to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, in vitro. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect: 1–6. doi: 10.1080/03235408.2013.860723
- Velasco P, Soengas P, Vilar M, Cartea ME (2008) Comparison of glucosinolate profiles in leaf and seed tissues of different Brassica napus crops. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 144:551–558Google Scholar
- Wathelet J-P, Iori R, Leoni O, Quinsac A, Palmieri S (2004) Guidelines for glucosinolate analysis in green tissues used for biofumigation. Agroindustria 3:257–266Google Scholar
- Zsolnai T (1966) Antimicrobial effect of thiocyanates and isothiocyanates. Arnzeim Forsch 16:870–876Google Scholar