Accumulation and partitioning of biomass, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium among different tissues during the life cycle of rice grown under different water management regimes
Background and aims
Knowledge on periodic uptake, accumulation and allocation of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in different tissues of a rice plant under different soil moisture management conditions is important when implementing efficient and effective water management practices ensuring sustainable rice production.
Rice variety Bg358 was grown in soil columns containing sufficient amounts of N, P and K. Four water management treatments were used; (i) continuous flooding (CF) of soil from crop establishment to maturity, (ii) CF until tillering (4 weeks) and Alternative Wetting and Drying (AWD4) thereafter, (iii) CF until flowering (10 weeks) and AWD thereafter (AWD10), (iv) CF until flowering and Top Soil Drying (TSD) thereafter (TSD10). Harvests were made in 2 weeks intervals.
Root growth of AWD4 decreased from 4th week compared with CF, and then enhanced from flowering onwards; thereby developing more roots in the top 20 cm soil layer increasing the root mass ratio. Both N and K uptake continued until maturity while P uptake continued until 2 weeks before maturity, and the amount taken up was highest for K and lowest for P. Moisture limitations substantially reduced tissue P content and retranslocation of P to panicles while the lowest reductions were observed in N. Therefore, internal utilisation was most efficient for P and lowest for N i.e., during grain filling N resorbed only from flag leaves, K from green, dead and flag leaves and only in AWD4, and P from green, flag and dead leaves, and stems.
Initially reduced root growth under AWD stimulated after flowering. Soil moisture limitation reduced P uptake greatly and thus had most efficient internal P utilisation mechanisms throughout the life cycle while those of N were the lowest.
KeywordsAerobic rice Drought Growth Irrigation Partitioning Plasticity Resorption Retranslocation
The authors appreciate the financial support from the National Research Council, Sri Lanka under the grant NRC-11-179, and technical assistance provided by G. Wijesuriya. Authors appreciate the critical comments given by Dr LW Galagedara, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada and two reviewers to an earlier version of this manuscript.
- AgStat (2013) Socio economics and planning centre. Department of Agriculture, Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
- Bouman BAM (2001) Water-efficient management strategies in rice production. International rice research notes 16.2. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Philippines, pp 17–22Google Scholar
- Buresh RJ, Haefele SM (2010) Changes in paddy soils under transition to water-saving and diversified cropping system. In: Soil solution or a changing world: 19th world congress of soil science, IUSS, Brisbane, 1–6 Aug, pp 9–12Google Scholar
- FAO (2000) Fertilizer requirements in 2015 and 2030. Rome: food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome, pp 18Google Scholar
- Fixen PE (2009) World fertilizer nutrient reserves-a view to the future. Better Crops 93:8–11Google Scholar
- García AG, Neto DD, Basanta MV, Ovejero RFL, Favarin JL (2003) Logistic rice model for dry matter and nutrient uptake. Sci Agric 60:481–488Google Scholar
- Kitson RE, Melon MG (1944) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus as molybdovanadophosphoric acid. Ind Eng Chem 16:379, Analytical EditionGoogle Scholar
- Malik RK, Yadav A (2008) Direct-seeded rice in the indo-gangetic plain: progress, problems and opportunities. In: Humphreys E, Roth CH (eds) Permanent beds and rice-residue management for rice–wheat systems in the indo-gangetic plain. Proceedings of a workshop held in Ludhiana, India, 7–9 September 2006. ACIAR, Canberra, pp 133–143, ACIAR Proceedings No. 127Google Scholar
- Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanable FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA circular No. 939. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute (1995) SAS/Stat user guide, vol 2, version 6.1. SAS Institute, CarryGoogle Scholar
- Suriyagoda LDB, Ryan MH, Renton M, Lambers H (2014b) Plant responses to limited moisture and phosphorus availability – a meta-analysis. Adv Agron 124:133–200Google Scholar
- Tuong TP, Bouman BAM (2002) Rice production in water-scarce environments. Proceedings of the water productivity workshop, 12–14 November 2001. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
- Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Demeyer A, Pauwels JM (1999) Manual for the soil chemistry and fertility laboratory-analytical methods for soils and plants, equipment, and management of consumables. University of Gent, Gent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Weerarathne LVY, Suriyagoda LDB, Marambe B (2015) Competitive effects of barnyard grass (echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv) on rice (Oryza sativa L.) is less when phosphorus is applied to deeper layers of a phosphorus-deficient soil irrespective of the soil moisture availability. Plant Soil. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2383-y Google Scholar
- Ye Y, Liang X, Chen Y, Li L, Ji Y, Zhu C (2014) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation and partitioning, and C:N:P stoichiometry in late-season rice under different water and nitrogen managements. PLoS ONE 9(7):e101776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101776 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar