Plant and Soil

, Volume 391, Issue 1–2, pp 19–32 | Cite as

Genotypic differences in antioxidant response to phosphorus deficiency in Brassica napus

Regular Article


Background and aims

The effect of phosphorus (P) deficiency on plant growth and development depends on the ability of plants to adapt to induced stress. Oxidative stress may play a vital role in P deficient Brassica napus and the antioxidant ability of this plant may be an important mechanism for adapting to P deficiency. The present study aims to better understand the correlation between high P use efficiency and antioxidative ability by comparing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in the leaves and roots of two B. napus genotypes.


The response of the antioxidant defense system of two B. napus genotypes with different P use efficiencies to short-term P-free starvation and long-term low P stress were investigated by analyzing the activities of antioxidative enzymes, the superoxide free radical ion (O2 ·−) and H2O2 concentration, and the level of lipid peroxidation.


The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), and glutathione reductase (GR) in the leaves and roots were increased in both genotypes under the two P treatments. However, the activities of some of these enzymes exhibited tissue or genotype specificity. In the P use-inefficient genotype “B104-2,” more O2 ·− was accumulated and a higher level of lipid peroxidation was induced under P deficiency conditions compared with P use-efficient genotype “Eyou Changjia.” The GPX activity in the roots was considerably higher (20- to 30-fold) than in the leaves, whereas the CAT activity in the roots was lower (approximately 3-fold) than in the leaves in both genotypes.


Compared with P use-inefficient genotype “B104-2,” P use-efficient genotype “Eyou Changjia” suffered less oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation, and inhibited O2 ·− generation more effectively under low P stress. Severe oxidative damage was accompanied with a higher antioxidative enzyme activities in “B104-2” under low P stress.


P deficiency Oxidative stress Antioxidative enzymes Lipid peroxidation Brassica napus Genotypic difference 



This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation (31172019) and National Basic Research and Development Program (2011CB100301), China.


  1. Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Salem MA, Nabi G, Sharma S (2010) Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit Rev Biotechnol 30:161–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS (2002) Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J Exp Bot 53:1331–1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Asada K (2006) Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol 141:391–396CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargaz A, Faghire M, Farissi M, Drevon JJ, Ghoulam C (2013) Oxidative stress in the root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris is induced under conditions of phosphorus deficiency. Acta Physiol Plant 35:1633–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beers RF, Sizer IW (1952) A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J Biol Chem 195:133–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bose J, Rodrigo-Moreno A, Shabala S (2013) ROS homeostasis in halophytes in the context of salinity stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 65:1241–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowler C, Montagu MV, Inze D (1992) Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43:83–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilinyk E (2000) Responses to abiotic stresses. Buchanan BB Gruissem W Jones RL Eds Biochem. Mol. Biol. Plants. ASPP, Rockville, pp 1158–1203Google Scholar
  10. Broadbent P, Creissen GP, Kular B, Wellburn AR, Mullineaux PM (1995) Oxidative stress responses in transgenic tobacco containing altered levels of glutathione reductase activity. Plant J 8:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cakmak I (1994) Activity of ascorbate-dependent H2O2-scavenging enzymes and leaf chlorosis are enhanced in magnesium- and potassium-deficient leaves, but not in phosphorus-deficient leaves. J Exp Bot 278:1259–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creissen G, Firmin J, Fryer M, Kular B, Leyland N, Reynolds H, Pastori G, Wellburn F, Baker N, Wellburn A, Mullineaux P (1999) Elevated glutathione biosynthetic capacity in the chloroplasts of transgenic tobacco plants paradoxically causes increased oxidative stress. Plant Cell 11:1277–1292CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dat J, Vandenabeele S, Vranová E, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Van Breusegem F (2000) Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 57:779–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Azevedo Neto AD, Prisco JT, Enéas-Filho J, De Abreu CEB, Gomes-Filho E (2006) Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environ Exp Bot 56:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duan HY, Shi L, Ye XS, Wang YH, Xu FS (2009) Identification of phosphorous efficient germplasm in oilseed rape. J Plant Nutr 32:1148–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elstner EF, Heupel A (1976) Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal Biochem 70:616–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK (1977) Superoxide dismutases I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol 59:309–314CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:909–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman A, Takahashi H (2001) Macronutrient utilization by photosynthetic eukaryotes and the fabric of interactions. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:163–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM (1999) Free radicals in biology and medicine, Thirdth edn. Oxf. Univ, Midsomer Nort. Avon EnglGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernandez M, Fernandez-Garcia N, Diaz-Vivancos P, Olmos E (2010) A different role for hydrogen peroxide and the antioxidative system under short and long salt stress in Brassica oleracea roots. J Exp Bot 61:521–535CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. 347 (2nd edit), P32Google Scholar
  23. Jithesh MN, Prashanth SR, Sivaprakash KR, Parida AK (2006) Antioxidative response mechanisms in halophytes: their role in stress defence. J Genet 85:237–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Juszczuk I, Malusà E, Rychter AM (2001) Oxidative stress during phosphate deficiency in roots of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Plant Physiol 158:1299–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juvany M, Müller M, Munné-Bosch S (2013) Photo-oxidative stress in emerging and senescing leaves: a mirror image? J Exp Bot 64:3087–3098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kandlbinder A, Finkemeier I, Wormuth D et al (2004) The antioxidant status of photosynthesizing leaves under nutrient deficiency: redox regulation, gene expression and antioxidant activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant 120:63–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kobayashi M, Ohura I, Kawakita K et al (2007) Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulate the production of reactive oxygen species by potato NADPH oxidase. Plant Cell 19:1605–1080. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048884 Google Scholar
  28. Liang YC, Chen Q, Liu Q, Zhang WH, Ding RX (2003) Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Plant Physiol 160:1157–1164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin CC, Kao CH (2000) Effect of NaCl stress on H2O2 metabolism in rice leaves. Plant Growth Regul 30:151–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1006345126589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lynch JP (2011) Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol 156:1041–1049. doi: 10.1104/pp. 111.175414 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller G, Shulaev V, Mittler R (2008) Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress. Physiol Plant 133:481–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01090.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F (2004) Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci 9:490–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Suzuki N, Miller G, Tognetti VB, Vandepoele K, Gollery M, Sshulaev V, Van BF (2011) ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci 16:300–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moller IM (2001) Plant mitochondria and oxidative stress: electron transport, NADPH turnover, and metabolism of reactive oxygen species. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:561–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mostofa MG, Seraj ZI, Fujita M (2014) Exogenous sodium nitroprusside and glutathione alleviate copper toxicity by reducing copper uptake and oxidative damage in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Protoplasma. doi: 10.1007/s00709-014-0639-7 Google Scholar
  36. Munné-Bosch S, Queval G, Foyer CH (2013) The impact of global change factors on redox signaling underpinning stress tolerance. Plant Physiol 161:5–19CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakagami H, Soukupová H, Schikora A et al (2006) A mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase mediates reactive oxygen species homeostasis in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 281:38697–38704. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605293200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakano Y, Asada K (1981) Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22:867–880Google Scholar
  39. Noctor G, Foyer CH (1998) Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:249–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Patterson BD, MacRae EA, Ferguson IB (1984) Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV). Anal Biochem 139:487–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pintó-Marijuan M, Munné-Bosch S (2014) Photo-oxidative stress markers as a measure of abiotic stress-induced leaf senescence: advantages and limitations. J Exp Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru086 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Plaxton WC, Tran HT (2011) Metabolic adaptations of phosphate-starved plants. Plant Physiol 156:1006–1015. doi: 10.1104/pp. 111.175281 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ren F, Zhao CZ, Liu CS et al (2014) A Brassica napus PHT1 phosphate transporter, BnPht1;4, promotes phosphate uptake and affects roots architecture of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0249-y Google Scholar
  44. Robinson WD, Carson I, Ying S, Ellis K, Plaxton WC (2012) Eliminating the purple acid phosphatase AtPAP26 in Arabidopsis thaliana delays leaf senescence and impairs phosphorus remobilization. New Phytol 196:1024–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schroeder JI, Delhaize E, Frommer WB, Guerinot ML, Harrison MJ, Herrera-Estrella L, Horie T, Kochian LV, Munns R, Nishizawa NK, Tsay YF, Sanders D (2013) Using membrane transporters to improve crops for sustainable food production. Nature 497:60–66CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Shalata A, Mittova V, Volokita M, Tal M (2001) Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii to salt-dependent oxidative stress: the root antioxidative system. Physiol Plant 112:487–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M (2012) Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot. doi: 10.1155/2012/217037 Google Scholar
  48. Tewari RK, Kumar P, Sharma PN (2007) Oxidative stress and antioxidant responses in young leaves of mulberry plants grown under nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium deficiency. J Integr Plant Biol 49:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang WB, Kim YH, Lee HS, Kim KY, Deng XP, Kwak SS (2009) Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:570–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang L, Lu S, Zhang Y et al (2014) Comparative genetic analysis of Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatases AtPAP10, AtPAP12, and AtPAP26 provides new insights into their roles in plant adaptation to phosphate deprivation. J Integr Plant Biol 56:299–314. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12184 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Westerman RL (1990) Soil testing and plant analysis. 3rd Ed. American Society of Agronomy, p 181–193Google Scholar
  52. Willekens H, Chamnongpol S, Davey M, Schraudner M, Langebartels C, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Van Camp W (1997) Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO J 16:4806–4816CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang HW, Huang Y, Ye XS, Shi L, Xu FS (2009) Genotypic differences in phosphorus acquisition and the rhizosphere properties of Brassica napus in response to low phosphorus stress. Plant Soil 320:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuisen Chen
    • 1
  • Hua Zhao
    • 1
  • Guangda Ding
    • 1
  • Fangsen Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and Microelement Research CenterHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations