Genotypic differences in antioxidant response to phosphorus deficiency in Brassica napus
- 421 Downloads
Background and aims
The effect of phosphorus (P) deficiency on plant growth and development depends on the ability of plants to adapt to induced stress. Oxidative stress may play a vital role in P deficient Brassica napus and the antioxidant ability of this plant may be an important mechanism for adapting to P deficiency. The present study aims to better understand the correlation between high P use efficiency and antioxidative ability by comparing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in the leaves and roots of two B. napus genotypes.
The response of the antioxidant defense system of two B. napus genotypes with different P use efficiencies to short-term P-free starvation and long-term low P stress were investigated by analyzing the activities of antioxidative enzymes, the superoxide free radical ion (O2 ·−) and H2O2 concentration, and the level of lipid peroxidation.
The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), and glutathione reductase (GR) in the leaves and roots were increased in both genotypes under the two P treatments. However, the activities of some of these enzymes exhibited tissue or genotype specificity. In the P use-inefficient genotype “B104-2,” more O2 ·− was accumulated and a higher level of lipid peroxidation was induced under P deficiency conditions compared with P use-efficient genotype “Eyou Changjia.” The GPX activity in the roots was considerably higher (20- to 30-fold) than in the leaves, whereas the CAT activity in the roots was lower (approximately 3-fold) than in the leaves in both genotypes.
Compared with P use-inefficient genotype “B104-2,” P use-efficient genotype “Eyou Changjia” suffered less oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation, and inhibited O2 ·− generation more effectively under low P stress. Severe oxidative damage was accompanied with a higher antioxidative enzyme activities in “B104-2” under low P stress.
KeywordsP deficiency Oxidative stress Antioxidative enzymes Lipid peroxidation Brassica napus Genotypic difference
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation (31172019) and National Basic Research and Development Program (2011CB100301), China.
- Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilinyk E (2000) Responses to abiotic stresses. Buchanan BB Gruissem W Jones RL Eds Biochem. Mol. Biol. Plants. ASPP, Rockville, pp 1158–1203Google Scholar
- Creissen G, Firmin J, Fryer M, Kular B, Leyland N, Reynolds H, Pastori G, Wellburn F, Baker N, Wellburn A, Mullineaux P (1999) Elevated glutathione biosynthetic capacity in the chloroplasts of transgenic tobacco plants paradoxically causes increased oxidative stress. Plant Cell 11:1277–1292CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM (1999) Free radicals in biology and medicine, Thirdth edn. Oxf. Univ, Midsomer Nort. Avon EnglGoogle Scholar
- Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. 347 (2nd edit), P32Google Scholar
- Nakano Y, Asada K (1981) Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22:867–880Google Scholar
- Wang L, Lu S, Zhang Y et al (2014) Comparative genetic analysis of Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatases AtPAP10, AtPAP12, and AtPAP26 provides new insights into their roles in plant adaptation to phosphate deprivation. J Integr Plant Biol 56:299–314. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12184 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westerman RL (1990) Soil testing and plant analysis. 3rd Ed. American Society of Agronomy, p 181–193Google Scholar