Assessment of multi-scale soil-plant interactions in a poplar plantation using geostatistical data fusion techniques: relationships to soil respiration
Background and aims
An adequate sampling strategy for the estimation of soil respiration depends on spatial heterogeneity in soil and plant characteristics. The objective of this work was the assessment of the spatial soil-plant interactions to define a sampling strategy of soil CO2 efflux.
In a long-term poplar plantation in Italy, a joint analysis of spatial variability of soil and plant properties was performed using geostatistical data fusion techniques. Soil samples were collected at 64 points and analyzed for pH, organic carbon, nitrogen, available phosphorous and texture. Trunk diameter was measured for 446 trees.
The analysis of the whole data set (soil and plant properties) revealed the presence of three main scales of variation: a nugget effect (micro-scale), 30 and 100 m.
Most spatial variation (71 %) was observed at the longer range scale; soil spatial variability was reflected in the differences in plant growth and affected soil CO2 emissions significantly.
The joint analysis of soil and plant properties allowed to model their spatial scale-dependent relationships. A map of a synthetic indicator of joint soil-plant variation can be used to choose the most representative plots for soil respiration monitoring.
KeywordsLong-term poplar plantation Spatial variability Soil-plant relationship Geostatistics Data fusion Soil respiration
We received substantial support from the owner and manager of the poplar site, Mr G. Cova-Minotti and Mr. F. Zanoli, and from the person responsible for the Ticino Park, Mr M. Furlanetto. We thank Mr. F. Biressi and Mr. M. Brambilla for help with field and laboratory work and Mr. F. Moia for laboratory assistance. Special thanks go to Mr. G. Seufert and Mr. A. Leip for the fruitful discussions and useful suggestions and to Mr. Gabriele Buttafuoco for careful reading and helpful comments.
- Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographic information systems for land resources assessment. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Burt R (ed) (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. SSIR No 42, US Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Chiles JP, Delfiner P (1999) Discrete exact simulation by the Fourier method. In: Geostatistics Wollongong 96, Proceedings of the Fifth International Geostatistics Congress, Wollongong, Australia, pp 258–269Google Scholar
- Ferré C, Comolli R, Leip A, Seufert G (2014) Forest conversion to poplar plantation in a Lombardy floodplain (Italy): effects on soil organic carbon stock. Biogeosciences 11:6483–6493. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-6483-2014
- Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World Reference Base for soil resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports 103, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Lajaunie C, Béhaxétéguy JP (1989) Elaboration d’un programme d’ajustement semiautomatique d’un modèle de corégionalisation. Theorie technical report N21/89/G, ENSMP, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Luo Y, Zhou X (2006) Soil respiration and the environment. Academic, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Matheron G (1982) Pour une analyse krigeante des donnees regionalisées. Technical Report No 732, Centre de Geostatistique, FontainebleauGoogle Scholar
- Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939, US Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Perron J-Y (1996) Inventaire forestier. In: Ordre des ingénieurs forestiers du Québec (ed) Manuel de foresterie. Les Presses de l’Université, Ste-Foy, Québec, pp 390–473Google Scholar
- Tomaselli R, Gentile S (1971) La riserva naturale integrale “Bosco Siro Negri” dell’Università di Pavia. Atti Ist Lab Critt Univ Pavia 7:41–70Google Scholar
- Webster R, Oliver MA (2003) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester, EnglandGoogle Scholar