Plant and Soil

, Volume 388, Issue 1–2, pp 67–85 | Cite as

Reduced nitrogen leaching by intercropping maize with red fescue on sandy soils in North Europe: a combined field and modeling study

  • Kiril Manevski
  • Christen D. Børgesen
  • Mathias N. Andersen
  • Ib S. Kristensen
Regular Article



To study maize (Zea mays L.) growth and soil nitrogen (N) dynamics in monocrop and intercropped systems in a North European climate and soil conditions with the support of a simulation model.


Field data for 3 years at two sites/soil types in Denmark and three main factors: (i) cropping history (maize or grass-clover), (ii) maize monocrop or intercropped with red fescue (Festuca rubra L.) and (iii) three fertilizer N rates, were used to calibrate and validate the DAISY model for simulation of crop growth and soil N dynamics. Field and model results were used to study the treatment effects on the maize systems.


Intercropped maize had 15–37 % lower N leaching than monocrop maize. Maize intercropping following a maize crop was achieved without yield loss at the standard N rate or higher, while red fescue offset N leaching. Maize intercropping following grass-clover needed less N, thereby greatly reducing the N leaching.


The hypothesis that maize intercropping with fertilizer N rates applicable to monocrop maize decreases N leaching without significant yield loss was largely supported given the effect of cropping history and soil type. The applicability of DAISY was extended to provide better analyses of intercropping systems and complex management options to reduce N leaching across northern Europe.


Competition Crop growth Grass-clover Field conditions Nitrogen dynamics Simulation 



The authors would like to thank Søren Hansen and Per Abrahamsen at Copenhagen University for advice on the modeling details.


  1. Askegaard M, Olesen JE, Kristensen K (2005) Nitrate leaching from organic arable crop rotations: effects of location, manure and catch crop. Soil Use Manag 21:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Askegaard M, Olesen JE, Rasmussen IA, Kristensen K (2011) Nitrate leaching from organic arable crop rotations is mostly determined by autumn field management. Agr Ecosyst Environ 142:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellocchi G, Rivington M, Donatelli M, Matthews K (2010) Validation of biophysical models: issues and methodologies. a review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berntsen J, Hauggard-Nielsen H, Olesen JE, Petersen BM, Jensen ES, Thomsen A (2004) Modelling dry matter production and resource use in intercrops of pea and barley. Field Crop Res 88:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berntsen J, Grant R, Olesen JE, Kristensen IS, Vinther FP, Mølgaard JP, Petersen BM (2006) Nitrogen cycling in organic farming systems with rotational grass–clover and arable crops. Soil Use Manag 22:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Best EK (1975) An automated method for determining nitrate nitrogen in soil extracts. Queensland Department of Primary Industries. Bulletin no. 739, Queensland Wheat Research Institute, Toowoomba, Old 4350, Australia.Google Scholar
  7. Borgesen CD, Olesen JE (2011) A probabilistic assessment of climate change impacts on yield and nitrogen leaching from winter wheat in Denmark. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 11:2541–2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruun S, Jensen LS (2002) Initialisation of the soil organic matter pools of the Daisy model. Ecol Model 153:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choudhury BJ (2001) Modeling radiation- and carbon-use efficiencies of maize, sorghum, and rice. Agr Forest Meteorol 106:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Constantin J, Beaudoin N, Laurent F, Cohan J-P, Duyme F, Mary B (2011) Cumulative effects of catch crops on nitrogen uptake, leaching and net mineralization. Plant Soil 341:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crooke WM, Simpson WE (1971) Determination of ammonium in Kjeldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure. J Sci Food Agr 22:9–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doltra J, Olesen JE (2013) The role of catch crops in the ecological intensification of spring cereals in organic farming under Nordic climate. Eur J Agron 44:98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doltra J, Laegdsmand M, Olesen JE (2011) Cereal yield and quality as affected by nitrogen availability in organic and conventional arable crop rotations: a combined modeling and experimental approach. Eur J Agron 34:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrmann J, Ritz K (2014) Plant: soil interactions in temperate multi-cropping production systems. Plant Soil 376:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elsgaard L et al (2012) Shifts in comparative advantages for maize, oat and wheat cropping under climate change in Europe. Food Addit Contam A 29:1514–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis: I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp pp. 383–411Google Scholar
  17. Gerwitz A, Page ER (1974) An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems. J Appl Ecol 11:773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghaley B, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Høgh-Jensen H, Jensen ES (2005) Intercropping of wheat and pea as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 73:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goudriaan J, van Laar HH (1978) Calculation of daily totals of the gross C02 assimilation of leaf canopies. Neth J Agr Sci 26:10Google Scholar
  20. Hansen L (1976) Soil types at the danish state experimental stations. Tidsskr Planteavl 80:742–758 (in Danish with English summary)Google Scholar
  21. Hansen B (1989) Determination of nitrogen as elementary-n, an alternative to Kjeldahl. Acta Agr Scand 39:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen S (2002) Daisy Description - Equation Section One vol 2012. Copenhagen University (, Copenhagen, Denmark
  23. Hansen S, Jensen HE, Nielsen NE, Svendsen H (1991) Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in winter-wheat using the danish simulation-model daisy. Fert Res 27:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen S, Jensen HE, Nielsen NE, Svendsen H (1993) The soil plant system model DAISY: basic principles and modelling approach. simulation model for transformation and transport of energy and matter in the soil plant atmosphere system. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University of Copenhagen, JordbrugsforlagetGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansen S, Abrahamsen P, Petersen CT, Styczen M (2012) daisy: model use, calibration and validation. Trans ASABE Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 55:18Google Scholar
  26. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2001) Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops – a field study employing 32P technique. Plant Soil 236:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heidmann T (1989a) Startkarakterisering af arealer til systemforskning. II, Resultater fra arealet ved Foulum (on Danish). Tidsskrift for planteavls specialserie, vol 186 p. Statens planteavlsforsøg, [Copenhagen]Google Scholar
  28. Heidmann T (1989b) Startkarakterisering af arealer til systemforskning. IV. Resultater fra arealet ved Jyndevad (on Danish). Statens Planteavlsforsøg,Google Scholar
  29. Heidmann T et al (2008) Calibration procedure for a potato crop growth model using information from across Europe. Ecol Model 211:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henriksen HJ et al. (2013) Prediction of climatic impacts on pesticide leaching to the aquatic environments.Evaluation of direct and indirect (crop rotations,crop management, and pesticide use) climate change effects of pesticide leaching in a regulatory perspective for two Danish cases. Pesticide research no. 143. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. doi:978-87-92903-23-5Google Scholar
  31. Herrmann A, Kersebaum KC, Taube F (2005) Nitrogen fluxes in silage maize production: relationship between nitrogen content at silage maturity and nitrate concentration in soil leachate. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 73:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacobsen OH (1989) Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity for some Danish soils. Report no.S 2030–1989.Statens Planteavlsforsøg.Google Scholar
  33. Kankanen H, Eriksson C (2007) Effects of undersown crops on soil mineral N and grain yield of spring barley. Eur J Agron 27:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kayser M, Seidel K, Muller J, Isselstein J (2008) The effect of succeeding crop and level of N fertilization on N leaching after break-up of grassland. Eur J Agron 29:200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kayser M, Benke M, Isselstein J (2011) Little fertilizer response but high N loss risk of maize on a productive organic-sandy soil. Agron Sustain Dev 31:709–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kristiansen SM, Hansen EM, Jensen LS, Christensen BT (2005) Natural C-13 abundance and carbon storage in Danish soils under continuous silage maize. Eur J Agron 22:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ledgard SF, Sprosen MS, Penno JW, Rajendram GS (2001) Nitrogen fixation by white clover in pastures grazed by dairy cows: temporal variation and effects of nitrogen fertilization. Plant Soil 229:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewan E (1994) Effects of a catch crop on leaching of nitrogen from a sandy soil - simulations and measurements. Plant Soil 166:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lord EI, Shepherd MA (1993) Developments in the use of porous ceramic cups for measuring nitrate leaching. J Soil Sci 44:435–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maag M, Lind AM, Eiland F (1996) Emission of nitrous oxide and denitrification from Danish soils amended with slurry and fertilizer. In: Van Cleemput O, Hofman G, Vermoesen A (eds) Progress in nitrogen cycling studies, vol 68. developments in plant and soil sciences. Springer, Netherlands, pp 581–584. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-5450-5_95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Macdonald AJ, Poulton PR, Howe MT, Goulding KWT, Powlson DS (2005) The use of cover crops in cereal-based cropping systems to control nitrate leaching in SE England. Plant Soil 273:355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malézieux E et al (2009) Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. a review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Müller T, Thorup-Kristensen K, Magid J, Jensen LS, Hansen S (2006) Catch crops affect nitrogen dynamics in organic farming systems without livestock husbandry—Simulations with the DAISY model. Ecol Model 191:538–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muller J, Kayser M, Isselstein J (2011) Silage maize (Zea mays L) ripening behaviour affects nitrate leaching over following winter. Maydica 56:389–397Google Scholar
  45. Odgaard MV, Bocher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning JC (2011) Climatic and non-climatic drivers of spatiotemporal maize-area dynamics across the northern limit for maize production-a case study from Denmark. Agr Ecosyst Environ 142:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olesen JE et al (2012) Changes in time of sowing, flowering and maturity of cereals in Europe under climate change. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 29:1527–1542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pedersen A, Petersen BM, Eriksen J, Hansen S, Jensen LS (2007) A model simulation analysis of soil nitrate concentrations—does soil organic matter pool structure or catch crop growth parameters matter most? Ecol Model 205:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pedersen A, Thorup-Kristensen K, Jensen LS (2009) Simulating nitrate retention in soils and the effect of catch crop use and rooting pattern under the climatic conditions of Northern Europe. Soil Use Manag 25:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salazar O, Hansen S, Abrahamsen P, Hansen K, Gundersen P (2013) Changes in soil water balance following afforestation of former arable soils in Denmark as evaluated using the DAISY model. J Hydrol 484:128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sapkota TB, Askegaard M, Lægdsmand M, Olesen JE (2012) Effects of catch crop type and root depth on nitrogen leaching and yield of spring barley. Field Crop Res 125:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schröder JJ, Dijk WV, Groot WJM (1996) Effects of cover crops on the nitrogen fluxes in a silage maize production system. Neth J Agr Sci 44:293–315Google Scholar
  52. Schröder JJ, Neeteson JJ, Withagen JCM, Noij IGAM (1998) Effects of N application on agronomic and environmental parameters in silage maize production on sandy soils. Field Crop Res 58:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shili-Touzi I, De Tourdonnet S, Launay M, Dore T (2010) Does intercropping winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with red fescue (Festuca rubra) as a cover crop improve agronomic and environmental performance? a modeling approach. Field Crop Res 116:218–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stoltz E, Nadeau E (2014) Effects of intercropping on yield, weed incidence, forage quality and soil residual N in organically grown forage maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Field Crop Res 169:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stoltz E, Nadeau E, Wallenhammar A-C (2013) Intercropping maize and faba bean for silage under swedish climate conditions. Agric Res 2:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Svendsen H, Hansen S, Jensen HE (1995) Simulation of crop production, water and nitrogen balances in two German agro-ecosystems using the DAISY model. Ecol Model 81:197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Svoboda N, Taube F, Wienforth B, Kluß C, Kage H, Herrmann A (2013) Nitrogen leaching losses after biogas residue application to maize. Soil Tillage Res 130:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson RB, Meisinger JJ (2005) Gaseous nitrogen losses and ammonia volatilization measurement following land application of cattle slurry in the mid-Atlantic region of the USA. Plant Soil 266:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thorsted MD, Olesen JE, Weiner J (2006) Width of clover strips and wheat rows influence grain yield in winter wheat/white clover intercropping. Field Crop Res 95:280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thorup-Kristensen K, Magid J, Jensen LS (2003) Catch crops and green manures as biological tools in nitrogen management in temperate zones. Adv Agron 79:227–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Torstensson G, Aronsson H (2000) Nitrogen leaching and crop availability in manured catch crop systems in Sweden. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 56:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Genuchten MT, Leij FJ, Yates SR (1991) The RETC Code for Quantifying the Hydraulic Functions of Unsaturated Soils, Version 1.0. vol EPA Report 600/2-91/065. U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, California, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  63. Verloop J, Hilhorst GJ, Oenema J, Keulen H, Sebek LBJ, Ittersum MK (2014) Soil N mineralization in a dairy production system with grass and forage crops. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 98:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vinther FP, Hansen S (2004) SimDen - a simple tool for estimating denitrification and N2O emission in agricultural soils. DJF rapport, Markbrug nr. 104 (on Danish).Google Scholar
  65. Vinther FP, Hansen EM, Olesen JE (2004) Effects of plant residues on crop performance, N mineralisation and microbial activity including field CO2 and N2O fluxes in unfertilised crop rotations. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 70:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wachendorf M, Buchter M, Volkers KC, Bobe J, Rave G, Loges R, Taube F (2006a) Performance and environmental effects of forage production on sandy soils. V. Impact of grass understorey, slurry application and mineral N fertilizer on nitrate leaching under maize for silage. Grass Forage Sci 61:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wachendorf M, Volkers KC, Loges R, Rave G, Taube F (2006b) Performance and environmental effects of forage production on sandy soils. IV. impact of slurry application, mineral N fertilizer and grass understorey on yield and nitrogen surplus of maize for silage. Grass Forage Sci 61:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitmore AP, Schroder JJ (2007) Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield: a modelling study. Eur J Agron 27:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wiesler F, Horst WJ (1993) Differences among maize cultivars in the utilization of soil nitrate and the related losses of nitrate through leaching. Plant Soil 151:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang HS, Dobermann A, Lindquist JL, Walters DT, Arkebauer TJ, Cassman KG (2004) Hybrid-maize—a maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches. Field Crop Res 87:131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiril Manevski
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christen D. Børgesen
    • 1
  • Mathias N. Andersen
    • 1
  • Ib S. Kristensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgroecologyAarhus UniversityTjeleDenmark
  2. 2.Sino-Danish Center for Education and ResearchAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations