Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 386, Issue 1–2, pp 237–250 | Cite as

Zeta potential at the root surfaces of rice characterized by streaming potential measurements

  • Zhong-yi Li
  • Yuan Liu
  • Yun-yun Zheng
  • Ren-kou Xu
Regular Article

Abstract

Aim

Our objective was to determine the in situ zeta potential at the root surfaces of rice.

Methods

A streaming potential apparatus made in our laboratory was used to measure zeta potential at the root surfaces.

Results

Zeta potential at the root surfaces could be calculated from streaming potential measured by the apparatus, and the measurements of streaming potential had good stability, reproducibility and accuracy. Ionic strength, electrolyte type, pH influenced the zeta potentials, with being consistent with theoretical calculations. The absolute value of the zeta potential at the root surfaces decreased with increasing ionic strength due to compression of diffuse layer of the electric double layer. Cations had much greater impact on zeta potential than anions due to the electrostatic attraction of cations by the negatively charged root surfaces and electrostatic repulsion of anions. The effects of different cations on the zeta potential followed the order: Al3+ > H+ > Cu2+ > Mg2+ ≈ Ca2+ > K+ ≈ Na+. The zeta potential of root surfaces became more negative with increasing pH due to deprotonation of functional groups on roots.

Conclusions

Streaming potential measurement is a novel method that can be used to calculate zeta potential of root surfaces.

Keywords

Rice root surfaces Streaming potential Zeta potential Surface charge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41230855) and the Knowledge Innovation Program Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-EW-405).

Supplementary material

11104_2014_2259_MOESM1_ESM.doc (210 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 210 kb)

References

  1. Bukšek H, Luxbacher T, Petrinić I (2010) Zeta potential determination of polymeric materials using two differently designed measuring cells of an electrokinetic analyzer. Acta Chim Slov 57:700–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai X, Chen T, Zhou Q, Xu L, Qu L, Hua X, Lin J (2011) Development of casparian strip in rice cultivars. Plant Signal Behav 6:59–65PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dąbkowska M, Adamczyk Z, Kujda M (2013) Mechanism of HSA adsorption on mica determined by streaming potential, AFM and XPS measurements. Colloids Surf B 101:442–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Déon S, Fievet P, Doubad CO (2012) Tangential streaming potential/current measurements for the characterization of composite membranes. J Membr Sci 423–424:413–421Google Scholar
  5. Dučić T, Thieme J, Polle A (2012) Phosphorus compartmentalization on the cellular level of Douglas Fir root as affected by Mn toxicity: a synchrotron-based FTIR approach. J Spectrosc 27:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. El Zemrany H, Czarnes S, Hallett P, Alamercery S, Bally R, Jocteur Monrozier L (2007) Early changes in root characteristics of maize (Zea mays) following seed inoculation with the PGPR Azospirillum lipoferum CRT1. Plant Soil 291:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fa K, Paruchuri VK, Brown SC, Moudgil BM, Miller JD (2005) The significance of electrokinetic characterization for interpreting interfacial phenomena at planar, macroscopic interfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:678–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fairbrother F, Mastin H (1924) CCCXII.-studies in electro-endosmosis. Part I. J Chem Soc T 125:2319–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng H, Yan M, Fan X, Li B, Shen Q, Miller AJ, Xu G (2011) Spatial expression and regulation of rice high-affinity nitrate transporters by nitrogen and carbon status. J Exp Bot 62:2319–2332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu P, Hu S, Xiang J, Sun L, Li P, Zhang J, Zheng C (2009) Pyrolysis of maize stalk on the characterization of chars formed under different devolatilization conditions. Energy Fuel 23:4605–4611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallardo-Moreno AM, Vadillo-Rodríguez V, Perera-Núñez J, Bruque JM, González-Martín ML (2012) The zeta potential of extended dielectrics and conductors in terms of streaming potential and streaming current measurements. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:9758–9767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Jung TM (2007) Consequences of the nanoporosity of cellulosic fibers on their streaming potential and their interactions with cationic polyelectrolytes. Cellulose 14:655–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science: principles and applications. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Jouniaux L, Bordes C (2012) Frequency-dependent streaming potentials: A review. Int J Geophys 2012: doi: 10.1155/2012/648781
  15. Kinraide TB (2001) Ion fluxes considered in terms of membrane-surface electrical potentials. Funct Plant Biol 28:607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinraide TB (2006) Plasma membrane surface potential (ψ PM) as a determinant of ion bioavailability: a critical analysis of new and published toxicological studies and a simplified method for the computation of plant ψ PM. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:3188–3198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinraide TB, Ryan PR, Kochian LV (1992) Interactive effects of Al3+, H+, and other cations on root elongation considered in terms of cell-surface electrical potential. Plant Physiol 99:1461–1468PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kinraide TB, Yermiyahu U, Rytwo G (1998) Computation of surface electrical potentials of plant cell membranes correspondence to published zeta potentials from diverse plant sources. Plant Physiol 118:505–512PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kopittke PM, Blamey FPC, Wang P, Menzies NW (2011) Calculated activity of Mn2+ at the outer surface of the root cell plasma membrane governs Mn nutrition of cowpea seedlings. J Exp Bot 62:3993–4001PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kopittke PM, Wang P, Menzies NW, Naidu R, Kinraide TB (2014) A web-accessible computer program for calculating electrical potentials and ion activities at cell-membrane surfaces. Plant Soil 375:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lammers K, Arbuckle-Keil G, Dighton J (2009) FT-IR study of the changes in carbohydrate chemistry of three New Jersey pine barrens leaf litters during simulated control burning. Soil Biol Biochem 41:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanteri Y, Fievet P, Déon S, Sauvade P, Ballout W, Szymczyk A (2012) Electrokinetic characterization of hollow fibers by streaming current, streaming potential and electric conductance. J Membr Sci 411–412:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawrence ND, Perera JM, Iyer M, Hickey MW, Stevens GW (2006) The use of streaming potential measurements to study the fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 48:106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meychik NR, Nikolaeva JL, Yermakov IP (2005) Ion exchange properties of the root cell walls isolated from the halophyte plants (Suaeda altissima L.) grown under conditions of different salinity. Plant Soil 277:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Møller IM, Lundborg T, Bérczi A (1984) The negative surface charge density of plasmalemma vesicles from wheat and oat roots. FEBS Lett 167:181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Shea P, Walters J, Ridge I, Wainright M, Trinci APJ (1990) Zeta potential measurements of cell wall preparations from Regnellidium diphyllum and Nymphoides peltata. Plant Cell Environ 13:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qiu Y, Cheng H, Xu C, Sheng GD (2008) Surface characteristics of crop-residue-derived black carbon and lead (II) adsorption. Water Res 42:567–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roessler S, Zimmermann R, Scharnweber D, Werner C, Worch H (2002) Characterization of oxide layers on Ti6Al4V and titanium by streaming potential and streaming current measurements. Colloids Surf B 26:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schweiss R, Welzel PB, Werner C, Knoll W (2001) Dissociation of surface functional groups and preferential adsorption of ions on self-assembled monolayers assessed by streaming potential and streaming current measurements. Langmuir 17:4304–4311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheffer MR, Reppert PM, Howie JA (2007) A laboratory apparatus for streaming potential and resistivity measurements on soil samples. Rev Sci Instrum 78:094502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shomer I, Novacky AJ, Pike SM, Yermiyahu U, Kinraide TB (2003) Electrical potentials of plant cell walls in response to the ionic environment. Plant Physiol 133:411–422PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wall S (2010) The history of electrokinetic phenomena. Curr Opin Colloid In 15:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang F, Hubbe MA (2001) Development and evaluation of an automated streaming potential measurement device. Colloids Surf A 194:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang P, Zhou D, Kinraide TB, Luo X, Li L, Li D, Zhang H (2008) Cell membrane surface potential (ψ 0) plays a dominant role in the phytotoxicity of copper and arsenate. Plant Physiol 148:2134–2143PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang P, Zhou D, Li L, Li D (2009) What role does cell membrane surface potential play in ion-plant interactions. Plant Signal Behav 4:42–43PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang YM, Kinraide TB, Wang P, Zhou DM, Hao XZ (2013) Modeling rhizotoxicity and uptake of Zn and Co singly and in binary mixture in wheat in terms of the cell membrane surface electrical potential. Environ Sci Technol 47:2831–2838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu Y, Hendershot WH (2009) Cation exchange capacity and proton binding properties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots. Water Air Soil Pollut 200:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xie H, Saito T, Hickner MA (2011) Zeta potential of ion-conductive membranes by streaming current measurements. Langmuir 27:4721–4727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yaroshchuk A, Ribitsch V (2002) Role of channel wall conductance in the determination of ζ-potential from electrokinetic measurements. Langmuir 18:2036–2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zembala M (2004) Electrokinetics of heterogeneous interfaces. Adv Colloid Interface 112:59–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zheng S, Lin X, Yang J, Liu Q, Tang C (2004) The kinetics of aluminum adsorption and desorption by root cell walls of an aluminum resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar. Plant Soil 261:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhong-yi Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuan Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yun-yun Zheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ren-kou Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable AgricultureInstitute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations