Winter cereal root growth and aboveground–belowground biomass ratios as affected by site and tillage system in dryland Mediterranean conditions
- 585 Downloads
Background and aims
Understanding the interaction between crop roots and management and environmental factors can improve crop management and agricultural carbon sequestration. The objectives of this study were to determine the response of winter cereal root growth and aboveground–belowground biomass ratios to tillage and environmental factors in the Mediterranean region and to test an alternative approach to determine root surface area.
Winter cereal root growth and biomass ratios were studied in three sites with different yield potential according to their water deficit (high yield potential, HYP; medium yield potential, MYP; low yield potential, LYP) in the Ebro Valley (NE Spain). At all sites, three tillage systems were compared (conventional tillage, minimum tillage, no-tillage (NT)). Root surface density (RSD), soil water content, yield components, and grain yield were quantified and shoot-to-root and grain-to-root ratios were calculated. RSD was measured with the use of image analysis software comparing its performance to a more common intersection method.
Significant differences on RSD between sites with different yield potential were found being the greatest at the HYP site and the lowest at the LYP one. Shoot-to-root ratio was 2.7 and 4.6 times greater at the HYP site than at the MYP and LYP sites, respectively. Moreover, the grain-to-root ratio was significantly affected by site, with a ratio that increased with yield potential. Tillage had no significant effects on RSD at any of the sites studied; however, tillage did affect grain yield, with NT having the greatest yields.
This study shows that in the Mediterranean dryland agroecosystems, winter cereals relative above- and belowground biomass growth is strongly affected by the yield potential of each area. NT in the Mediterranean areas does not limit cereal root growth and leads to greater grain yields. A highly significant linear relationship (P < 0.001; r 2 0.77) was observed between the root surface values obtained with the free-software image analysis method and the most common intersection method, showing it to be a reliable method for quantifying root density.
KeywordsPlant biomass ratios Mediterranean Roots Tillage
This study has been possible thanks to the laborious work and contributions of Marc Burillo, Àngel Domingo, Ferran Fontdecaba, Josep Llorens, Àngel Salvat, and Anísia Tardà. The laboratory and field technicians Sílvia Martí, Carlos Cortés, Javier Bareche, Xevi Moreno, and Josan Palacio are also acknowledged. D. Plaza-Bonilla was awarded an FPU fellowship by the Spanish Ministry of Education. This work was supported by the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología of Spain (grants AGL2007-66320-CO2-01 and AGL2010-22050-CO3-01/02).
- Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11:36–42Google Scholar
- Isla R, Angás P, Cantero-Martínez C, Aragües R (1999) Root and aerial development of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in saline conditions. Investigación agrarian Producción y Protección Vegetales 14:83–99, In SpanishGoogle Scholar
- Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, London. 889 ppGoogle Scholar
- Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595–607Google Scholar
- Rasband W (2011) ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 1997–2011, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
- SAS Institute (1990) SAS user's guide, statistics, 6th edn, vol 2. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
- Systat Software (2008) Sigmaplot user's guide: Sigmaplot 11.0. Systat Software, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- Vicente-Serrano SM, Beguería-Portugués S (2003) Estimating extreme dry-spell risk in the middle Ebro Valley (Northeastern Spain): a comparative analysis of partial duration series with a general Pareto distribution and annual maxima series with a Gumbel distribution. Int J Climatol 23:1103–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar