Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 373, Issue 1–2, pp 609–625 | Cite as

Modifying the LEACHM model for process-based prediction of nitrate leaching from cropped Andosols

  • Kei Asada
  • Sadao Eguchi
  • Rieko Urakawa
  • Sunao Itahashi
  • Tsuneo Matsumaru
  • Tomoko Nagasawa
  • Kazuhiro Aoki
  • Ken Nakamura
  • Hidetaka Katou
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

Nitrogen (N) management strategies for reducing the risk of groundwater contamination around agricultural fields require precise prediction of N leaching using a process-based model. We modified LEACHM model for use in Andosols, which are characterized by slow soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization and nitrate adsorption.

Methods

The modification was made with regard to the SOC mineralization of incoming plant-residue/manure and humus following the RothC model, as well as for nitrate adsorption. Empirical equations were employed to determine the parameters of the modified model. The ability of the modified LEACHM to predict N leaching was tested against existing data from a 4-year lysimeter study for cropped Andosol and sandy soils and compared with that of the original model.

Results

The modified model improved the prediction of leached N concentrations and the loss of N from Andosol with relative improvements of 63.5 and 76.5 %, respectively, over the original model, while retaining model applicability in sandy soil. This effective modeling was achieved by using precise predictions of N mineralization in the humus pool along with SOC mineralization processes that were based on the RothC model.

Conclusions

The modification extended the applicability of LEACHM and may provide better N management strategies for reducing leaching from cultivated Andosols.

Keywords

Andosol Groundwater quality LEACHM Modeling Nitrate leaching Soil organic carbon RothC model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. John Hutson for providing LEACHM model program codes and manuals. The authors would like to thank Mr. Kenji Saito and other members of soil environment conservation laboratory, Chiba Prefectural Agriculture and Forestry Research Center, for providing background information on the site’s management. The helpful suggestions of Dr. Nobuo Toride, Mr. Chen DaiWen and Dr. Taku Nishimura, are appreciated.

References

  1. Acutis M, Ducco G, Grignani C (2000) Stochastic use of the LEACHN model to forecast nitrate leaching in different maize cropping systems. Eur J Agron 13:191–206. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00074-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akinremi OO, Jame YW, Campbell CA, Zentner RP, Chang C, de Jong R (2005) Evaluation of LEACHMN under dryland conditions. I. Simulation of water and solute transport. Can J Soil Sci 85:223–232. doi: 10.4141/S03-076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  4. Borah MJ, Kalita PK (1999) Development and evaluation of a macropore flow component for LEACHM. Trans ASAE 42:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cannavo P, Recous S, Parnaudeau V, Reau R (2008) Modeling N dynamics to assess environmental impacts of cropped soils. Adv Agron 97:131–174. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(07)00004-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cichota R, Snow VO (2009) Estimating nutrient loss to waterways–an overview of models of relevance to New Zealand pastoral farms. New Zeal J Agr Res 52:239–260. doi: 10.1080/00288230909510509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman K, Jenkinson DS (1997) RothC-26.3 A model for the turnover of carbon in soil. In: Powlson D, Smith P, Smith J (eds) Evaluation of soil organic matter model using existing, long-term datasets. NATO ASI series I, 38. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 237–246Google Scholar
  8. Corwin DL, Vaughan PJ (1997) Modeling nonpoint source pollutants in the vadose zone with GIS. Environ Sci Tech 31:2157–2175. doi: 10.1021/es960796v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Decrem M, Spiess E, Richner W, Herzog F (2007) Impact of Swiss agricultural policies on nitrate leaching from arable land. Agron Sustain Dev 27:243–253. doi: 10.1051/agro:2007012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eguchi S, Aoki K, Kohyama K (2011) Development of agricultural soil-profile physical properties database, Japan: Solphy J Proceedings of the ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Annual Meetings 2011Google Scholar
  11. Endo A, Mishima S, Kohyama K (2009) Modeling nitrate leaching on a cropped Andosol. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 85:41–61. doi: 10.1007/s10705-009-9247-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falloon P, Smith P, Coleman K, Marshall S (1998) Estimating the size of the inert organic matter pool from total soil organic carbon content for use in the Rothamsted carbon model. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1207–1211. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00256-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grizzetti B, Bouraoui F, Billen G et al (2011) Nitrogen as a threat to European water quality. In: Sutton MA, Howard CM, Erismann JW et al (eds) The European nitrogen assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 379–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayashi K (2011) Inventory of ammonia emission from soils after chemical fertilizer application. NIAES res exec sum for 2011 27:58–59 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Hidaka S (1997) Nitrogen. In: Japanese Society of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition (ed) Soil environment analysis. Hakuyusya, Tokyo, pp 231–254 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press, Inc., CAGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchings N, Webb J, Amon B et al (2009) 4.D crop production and agricultural soils. In: European Environment Agency (EEA) (ed) EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2009. Technical report No 9/2009. European Environment Agency (EEA), CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutson JL (2005) LEACHM (leaching estimation and chemistry model) ver 4.1. Res Ser No. R03-1. Dep of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell Univ, Ithaca, revision version of 2003Google Scholar
  19. Hutson JL, Wagenet RJ (1991) Simulating nitrogen dynamics in soils using a deterministic model. Soil Use Manage 7:74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World soil resources reports No. 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  21. Jabro JD, Fales SL, Fox RH, Stout WL (1997) Nitrate leaching from soil core lysimeters treated with urine or feces under orchard grass: measurement and simulation. J Envion Qual 26:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jabro JD, Hutson JL, Jabro AD (2011) Parameterizing LEACHM model for simulating water drainage fluxes and nitrate leaching losses. In: Ahuja LR, Ma L (eds) Methods of introducing system models into agricultural research. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Wisconsin, pp 95–115Google Scholar
  23. Johnsson H, Bergstrom L, Jansson P, Paustian K (1987) Simulated nitrogen dynamics and losses in a layered agricultural soil. Agr Ecosyst Environ 18:333–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones CA, Kiniry JR (1986) CERES-maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas A & M University press, TexasGoogle Scholar
  25. Ju XT, Kou CL, Zhang FS, Christie P (2006) Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination: Comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain. Environ Pollut 143:117–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung YW, Oh DS, Kim M, Park JW (2010) Calibration of LEACHN model using LH-OAT sensitivity analysis. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 87:261–275. doi: 10.1007/s10705-009-9337-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katou H (2004) Determining competitive nitrate and chloride adsorption in an Andisol by the unsaturated transient flow method. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katou H, Clothier BE, Green SR (1996) Anion transport involving competitive adsorption during transient water flow in an Andisol. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1368–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL et al (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khakural BR, Robert PC (1993) Soil nitrate leaching potential indices: using a simulation model as a screening system. J Environ Qual 22:839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee KH, Jose S (2005) Nitrate leaching in cottonwood and loblolly pine biomass plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. Agr Ecosyst Environ 105:615–623. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ludwig B, John B, Ellerbrock R, Kaiser M, Flessa H (2003) Stabilization of carbon from maize in a sandy soil in a long-term experiment. Eur J Soil Sci 54:117–126. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00496.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maeda M (2008) Models to evaluate nitrogen flows in various scale as a pedon, field and a water catchment: 2. Introduction to simulation models of nitrogen dynamics in upland fields. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 79:89–99 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. Matsumaru T (1997) Evaluation of nitrate leaching in Ando and sandy soils by lysimeters. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 68:423–429 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  35. Miki N, Matsumoto T, Katou H (2009) Relative velocity of nitrate transport as affected by adsorption in different Andosols in Hokkaido. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 80:365–378 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan, MOE (2011) Results of groundwater quality measurement 2009. MOE, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  37. Nakamura K, Toride N (2007) Numerical modeling of nitrogen transport with first-order transformation processes in soils. J Jpn Soc Soil Phys 105:41–61 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  38. Nakamura K, Harter T, Hirono Y, Horino H, Mitsuno T (2004) Assessment of root zone nitrogen leaching as affected by irrigation and nutrient management practices. Vadose Zone J 3:1353–1366Google Scholar
  39. Nakamura S, Hayashi K, Omae H et al (2011) Validation of soil organic carbon dynamics model in the semi-arid tropics in Niger, West Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 89:375–385. doi: 10.1007/s10705-010-9402-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ng HYF, Drury CF, Serem VK, Tan CS, Gaynor JD (2000) Modeling and testing of the effect of tillage, cropping and water management practices on nitrate leaching in clay loam soil. Agr Water Manag 43:111–131. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00050-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nimah MN, Hanks RJ (1973) Model for estimating soil water, plant, and atmospheric interrelations: I. description and sensitivity. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:522–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nolan BT, Hitt KJ, Ruddy BC (2002) Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. Environ Sci Technol 36:2138–2145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nolan BT, Bayless ER, Green CT et al (2005) Evaluation of unsaturated-zone solute-transport models for studies of agricultural chemicals. USGS Open-File Report 2005–1196. U.S. Geological Survey, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  44. Osaki M, Shinano T, Tadano T (1992) Carbon-nitrogen interaction in field crop production. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 38:553–564. doi: 10.1007/BF00025019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Owa N (1996) Nutrient balance on crop production in Japan. In: Nogyo K-T (ed) New movement on effective use of fertilizer. National Agricultural Research Center, Tsukuba, pp 1–15 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  46. Ramos C, Carbonell EA (1991) Nitrate leaching and soil moisture prediction with the LEACHM model. Fert Res 27:171–180. doi: 10.1007/BF01051125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmied B, Abbaspour K, Schulin R (2000) Inverse estimation of parameters in a nitrogen model using field data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaffer MJ, Ma L, Hansen S (2001) Modeling carbon and nitrogen dynamics for soil management. CRC Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  49. Shirato Y, Hakamata T, Taniyama I (2004) Modified Rothamsted carbon model for Andosols and its validation: changing humus decomposition rate constant with pyrophosphate-extractable Al. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shoji S, Fujiwara Y (1984) Active aluminum and iron in the humus horizons of Andosols from northeastern Japan: their forms, properties, and significance in clay weathering. Soil Sci 137:216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simbahan GC, Dobermann A, Goovaerts P, Ping J, Haddix ML (2006) Fine-resolution mapping of soil organic carbon based on multivariate secondary data. Geoderma 132:471–489. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MT, Šejna M (2008) Development and applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD software packages, and related codes. Vadose Zone J 7:587–600. doi: 10.2136/VZJ2007.0077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith JU, Smith P, Addiscott TM (1996) Quantitative methods to evaluate and compare soil organic matter (SOM) models. In: Powlson DS, Smith P, Smith JU (eds) Evaluation of soil organic matter models. NATO ASI Ser. I 38. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sogbedji JM, van Es HM, Hutson JL (2001a) N fate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: I. Calibration of the LEACHMN model. Plant Soil 229:57–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1004875116644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sogbedji JM, van Es HM, Hutson JL (2001b) N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios. Plant Soil 229:71–82. doi: 10.1023/A:1004827200714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Takahashi T, Shoji S (2002) Distribution and classification of volcanic ash soils. Glob Environ Res 6:83–97Google Scholar
  57. Toyama M (1974) Fundamental research on the sunasaibai (a type of sand culture) III. Nitrification in the sand. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 42:317–325 (in Japanese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ueyama H (2008) The utilization of mesh meteorological data maps for agricultural activity in hilly and mountainous area. Res Bull Natl Agric Res Cent for Hokkaido Reg 7:145–207 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  59. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Genuchten MT, Leij FJ, Yates SR (1991) The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils, ver 1.0. EPA Report 600/2-91/065Google Scholar
  61. Williams JR (1995) The EPIC model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp 909–1000Google Scholar
  62. Wu J, O’Donnell AG, Syers JK, Adey MA, Vityakon P (1998) Modeling soil organic matter changes in ley-arable rotations in sandy soils of Northeast Thailand. Eur J Soil Sci 49:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kei Asada
    • 1
  • Sadao Eguchi
    • 1
  • Rieko Urakawa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sunao Itahashi
    • 1
  • Tsuneo Matsumaru
    • 3
  • Tomoko Nagasawa
    • 3
  • Kazuhiro Aoki
    • 1
  • Ken Nakamura
    • 1
  • Hidetaka Katou
    • 1
  1. 1.Carbon and Nutrient Cycles DivisionNational Institute for Agro-Environmental SciencesIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Agro-Environment Sciences and Biotechnology DivisionChiba Prefectural Agriculture and Forestry Research CenterChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations