Transcriptomic and proteomic comparison of two Miscanthus genotypes: high biomass correlates with investment in primary carbon assimilation and decreased secondary metabolism
- 830 Downloads
Background and aims
The plant genus Miscanthus combines high biomass production in temperate climates with low nutrient input requirements. Among the widely studied genotypes, the triploid hybrid Miscanthus x giganteus has attracted most interest because of its outstanding yields. Here, M. x giganteus was compared to its parent M. sinensis to identify traits associated with high biomass.
Comparative investigation of the element content, photosynthesis, transcriptomes and proteomes.
Photosynthesis-related and Calvin cycle enzymes are among the key traits differing between the two species. Major transcriptional differences pinpoint to a reduced investment into the secondary metabolism in M. x giganteus during rapid growth. A higher nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentration was found in the leaves of M. x giganteus. In the shotgun sequences of the leaf transcriptome, bacterial 16S sequences were identified. These were dominated by α–, γ–, δ–proteobacteria, despite Herbaspirillum and Clostridium species had been previously isolated from Miscanthus.
Miscanthus species thus differ in several key traits, which may help to guide future phenotyping efforts to select for high yielding varieties for sustainable biomass production. Having established these techniques in Miscanthus, the next step is to apply them in breeders’ germplasm.
KeywordsBiomass Bioenergy Sustainability Microbial metagenome Proteomics Transcriptomics Element content
We thank Prof. Ralf Kaldenhoff (Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany) for generous support of lab space and the Life Science Center of the University of Hohenheim (Dr. Pfannstiel) for peptide analysis.
DS carried out transcriptome work and analysis, YL, HY and DS performed the proteome work and UL conceived the study. DS and UL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
- Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, Zhang J (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5:R80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gericke S, Kurmies B (1952) Die kolorimetrische Phosphorsäurebestimmung mit Ammonium–Vandadat–Molybdat und ihre Anwendung in der Pflanzenanalyse. Z Düngg Pflanzenernähr Bodenk 59:235–247Google Scholar
- Gibon Y, Blaesing OE, Hannemann J, Carillo P, Hohne M, Hendriks JH, Palacios N, Cross J, Selbig J, Stitt M (2004) A Robot-based platform to measure multiple enzyme activities in Arabidopsis using a set of cycling assays: comparison of changes of enzyme activities and transcript levels during diurnal cycles and in prolonged darkness. Plant Cell 16:3304–3325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greef JM, Deuter M (1993) Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus-X-Giganteus Greef-Et-Deu. Angew Bot 67:87–90Google Scholar
- Hodgson EM, Nowakowski DJ, Shield I, Riche A, Bridgwater AV, Clifton-Brown JC, Donnison IS (2011) Variation in Miscanthus chemical composition and implications for conversion by pyrolysis and thermo-chemical bio-refining for fuels and chemicals. Bioresour Technol 102:3411–3418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Lamkemeyer T, Jakob A, Mi G, Zhang F, Nordheim A, Hochholdinger F (2006) Comparative proteome analyses of maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots prior to lateral root initiation reveal differential protein expression in the lateral root initiation mutant rum1. Proteomics 6:4300–4308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marschner P (2011) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Sessitsch A, Hardoim P, Doring J, Weilharter A, Krause A, Woyke T, Mitter B, Hauberg-Lotte L, Friedrich F, Rahalkar M, Hurek T, Sarkar A, Bodrossy L, van Overbeek L, Brar D, van Elsas JD, Reinhold-Hurek B (2012) Functional characteristics of an endophyte community colonizing rice roots as revealed by metagenomic analysis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:28–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sulpice R, Pyl ET, Ishihara H, Trenkamp S, Steinfath M, Witucka-Wall H, Gibon Y, Usadel B, Poree F, Piques MC, Von Korff M, Steinhauser MC, Keurentjes JJ, Guenther M, Hoehne M, Selbig J, Fernie AR, Altmann T, Stitt M (2009) Starch as a major integrator in the regulation of plant growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:10348–10353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Soest PJ (1963) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 46:829–835Google Scholar
- VDLUFA (1997) Method book III - The chemical analysis of feedstuffs. VDLUFA Verlag, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar