Nostoc, Microcoleus and Leptolyngbya inoculums are detrimental to the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress
- 469 Downloads
Background and aims
This study investigated the effect of cyanobacterial inoculants on salt tolerance in wheat.
Unicyanobacterial crusts of Nostoc, Leptolyngbya and Microcoleus were established in sand pots. Salt stress was targeted at 6 and 13 dS m−1, corresponding to the wheat salt tolerance and 50 % yield reduction thresholds, respectively. Germinated wheat seeds were planted and grown for 14 (0 and 6 dS m−1) and 21 (13 dS m−1) days by which time seedlings had five emergent leaves. The effects of cyanobacterial inoculation and salinity on wheat growth were quantified using chlorophyll fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry and biomass measurements.
Chlorophyll fluorescence was negatively affected by soil salinity and no change was observed in inoculated wheat. Effective photochemical efficiency correlated with a large range of plant nutrient concentrations primarily in plant roots. Inoculation negatively affected wheat biomass and nutrient concentrations at all salinities, though the effects were fewer as salinity increased.
The most likely explanation of these results is the sorption of nutrients to cyanobacterial extracellular polymeric substances, making them unavailable for plant uptake. These results suggest that cyanobacterial inoculation may not be appropriate for establishing wheat in saline soils but that cyanobacteria could be very useful for stabilising soils.
KeywordsCyanobacteria Nostoc Microcoleus Biological soil crust Wheat Salinity
We thank Pacific Seeds and Agrigrain Limited for providing seeds of Triticum aestivum L. ‘EGA Gregory’. We thank Dr. Murray Badger and Dr. Britta Forster of the Australian National University for assistance with Pulse Amplitude Modulation Fluorometry. A scholarship for W.S.C. was provided by the Grains Research and Development Corporation, Australia. The other authors are funded by the Australian Research Council, the Australian Centre for Astrobiology and the Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, Australia.
- Atak M, Kaya MD, Kaya G, Çikili Y, Çiftçi CY (2006) Effects of NaCl on the germination, seedling growth and water uptake of Triticale. Turk J Agric 30:39–47Google Scholar
- Blanco A, Sanz B, Llama MJ, Serra JL (1998) Reutilization of non-viable biomass of Phormidium laminosum for metal biosorption. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 27:167–174Google Scholar
- Charman PEV, Wooldridge AC (2000) Soil chemical properties: Soil salinisation. In: Charman PEV, Murphy BW (eds) Soils: their properties and management. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Oxford, pp 237–245Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2.12.0 edn. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- Hashem MA (2001) Problems and prospects of cyanobacterial biofertiliser for rice cultivation. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:881–888Google Scholar
- Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1938) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. University of California, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, BerkelyGoogle Scholar
- Maas EV (1986) Salt tolerance of plants. Appl Agr Res 1:12–26Google Scholar
- Maas EV, Hoffman GJ, Asce M (1977) Crop salt tolerance- current assessment. J Irr Drain Div 103:115–134Google Scholar
- Mashali AM (1999) Land degradation with focus on salinization and its management in Africa. In: Nabhan H, Mashali AM, Mermut AR (eds) Integrated soil management for sustainable agriculture and food security in southern and east Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 17–47Google Scholar
- Mazhar S, Hasnain S (2011) Screening of native plant growth promoting cyanobacteria and their impact on Triticum aestivum var. Uqab 2000 growth. Afr J Agric Res 6:3988–3993Google Scholar
- Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D. CGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez AA, Stella AM, Storni MM, Zulpa G, Zaccaro MC (2006) Effects of cyanobacterial extracellular products and gibberellic acid on salinity tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Saline Syst 2Google Scholar
- Sharma PK, Varma SK, Datta KS, Kumar B (1992) Salinity effects on some morpho-physiological water relations and mineral composition characteristics of two cultivars of wheat with varying salt resistance. Ann Biol 10:39–50Google Scholar
- Shaw RJ (1999) Soil salinity- electrical conductivity and chloride. In: Peverill KI, Sparrow LA, Reuter DJ (eds) Soil Analysis: an interpretation manual. CSIRO, Collingwood, pp 129–146Google Scholar
- Tanji KK (1990) Nature and extent of agricultural salinity. In: Tanji KK (ed.) Agricultural salinity assessment and management, ASCE Manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 71, American society of civil engineers, New York, pp 1–17Google Scholar
- Woo NS, Badger MR, Pogson BJ (2008) A rapid, non-invasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Meth. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-4-27