Plant and Soil

, Volume 369, Issue 1–2, pp 377–386 | Cite as

Root plasticity maintains growth of temperate grassland species under pulsed water supply

  • Francisco M. Padilla
  • Bart H. J. Aarts
  • Yvonne O. A. Roijendijk
  • Hannie de Caluwe
  • Liesje Mommer
  • Eric J. W. Visser
  • Hans de Kroon
Regular Article


Background and aims

The frequency of rain is predicted to change in high latitude areas with more precipitation in heavy, intense events interspersed by longer dry periods. These changes will modify soil drying cycles with unknown consequences for plant performance of temperate species.


We studied plant growth and root traits of juveniles of four grasses and four dicots growing in a greenhouse, when supplying the same total amount of water given either regular every other day or pulsed once a week.


Pulsed water supply replenished soil moisture immediately after watering, but caused substantial drought stress at the end of the watering cycle, whereas regular watering caused more moderate but consistent drought. Grasses had lower water use efficiency in the pulsed watering compared to regular watering, whereas dicots showed no difference. Both grasses and dicots developed thinner roots, thus higher specific root length, and greater root length in the pulsed watering. Growth of dicots was slightly increased under pulsed watering.


Temperate species coped with pulsed water supply by eliciting two responses: i) persistent shoot growth, most likely by maximizing growth at peaks of soil moisture, thus compensating for slower growth during drought periods; ii) plasticity of root traits related to increased resource uptake. Both responses likely account for subtle improvement of growth under changed water supply conditions.


Climate change δ13Water heterogeneity Water use efficiency Specific root length 



We thank Marloes Hendriks and Janneke Ravenek for help with root scanning, the staff of the Experimental Garden (IWWR, FNWI) of the Radboud University Nijmegen for taking care of the plants, Dr. Iván Prieto and three anonymous referees for reviewing earlier drafts. FMP was supported by a postdoc grant of the Spanish Ministry of Education.


  1. Bresser AHM, Berk MM, van den Born GJ, van Bree L, van Gaalen FW, Ligtvoet W, van Minnen JG, Witmer MCH (2005) The effects of climate change in the Netherlands. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, p 111Google Scholar
  2. Cahill JF, McNickle GG (2011) The behavioral ecology of nutrient roraging by plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 42:289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapin FS (1991) Integrated responses of plants to stress. BioScience 41:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Manéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional Climate Projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 847–940Google Scholar
  5. Comas LH, Eissenstat DM (2004) Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Funct Ecol 18:388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas J, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurements of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51:335–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP (2002) Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:507–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Kroon H, van der Zalm E, van Rheenen JWA, van Dijk A, Kreulen R (1998) The interaction between water and nitrogen translocation in a rhizomatous sedge (Carex flacca). Oecologia 116:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Kroon H, Visser EJW, Huber H, Mommer L, Hutchings MJ (2009) A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control. Plant Cell Environ 32:704–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Mooney HA, Canadell JG (2002) C3 and C4 photosynthesis in encyclopedia of global environmental. Vol. II. Change the earth system: biological and ecological dimensions of global environmental change. Wiley, Chichester, pp 186–190Google Scholar
  12. Eissenstat DM (1992) Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. J Plant Nutr 15:763–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD, Whitbeck JL (2000) Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytol 147:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Euro+Med 2006 Euro+Med PlantBase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. Published on the Internet
  15. Fay PA, Carlisle JD, Danner BT, Lett MS, McCarron JK, Stewart C, Knapp AK, Blair JM, Collins SL (2002) Altered rainfall patterns, gas exchange, and growth in grasses and forbs. Int J Plant Sci 163:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández RJ, Reynolds JF (2000) Potential growth and drought tolerance of eight desert grasses: lack of a trade-off? Oecologia 123:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ge Y, Chang J, Li WC, Sheng HY, Yue CL, Shan GYS (2003) Effect of soil moisture on the gas exchange of Changium smyrnioides and Anthriscus sylvestris. Biol Plant 47:605–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gebauer RLE, Ehleringer JR (2000) Water and nitrogen uptake patterns following moisture pulses in a cold desert community. Ecology 81:1415–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle-size analysis. In: Dane JH, Toppe GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4 Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 255–294Google Scholar
  20. Hagiwara Y, Kachi N, Suzuki JI (2010) Effects of temporal heterogeneity of water supply on the growth of Perilla frutescens depend on plant density. Ann Bot 106:173–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heisler-White JL, Blair JM, Kelly EF, Harmoney K, Knapp AK (2009) Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Glob Chang Biol 15:2894–2904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodge A (2010) Roots: the acquisition of water and nutrients from the heterogeneous soil environment. In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Büdel B, Francis D (eds) Progess in botany 71. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 307–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutchings MJ, de Kroon H (1994) Foraging in plants - the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Adv Ecol Res 25:159–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Geneva (Switzerland). pp 0-104Google Scholar
  25. Kinmonth-Schultz H, Kim SH (2011) Carbon gain, allocation and storage in rhizomes in response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and nutrient supply in a perennial C 3 grass, Phalaris arundinacea. Funct Plant Biol 38:797–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klimešová J, Limeš LK (1996) Effects of rhizome age and nutrient availability on carbohydrate reserves in Rumex alpinus rhizomes. Biologia 51:457–461Google Scholar
  27. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (2008) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New York, p 604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larcher W (2003) Physiological plant ecology. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lundholm JT, Larson DW (2004) Experimental separation of resource quantity from temporal variability: seedling responses to water pulses. Oecologia 141:346–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maestre FT, Reynolds JF (2007) Amount or pattern? Grassland responses to the heterogeneity and availability of two key resources. Ecology 88:501–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCormack ML, Adams TS, Smithwick EAH, Eissenstat DM (2012) Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees. New Phytol 195:823–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Metcalfe DB, Meir P, Aragão LEOC, da Costa ACL, Braga AP, Gonçalves PHL, de Athaydes Silva Junior J, de Almeida SS, Dawson LA, Malhi Y, Williams M (2008) The effects of water availability on root growth and morphology in an Amazon rainforest. Plant Soil 311:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS (2006) Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Glob Chang Biol 12:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mommer L, van Ruijven J, de Caluwe H, Smit-Tiekstra AE, Wagemaker CAM, Ouborg NJ, Bögemann GM, van der Weerden GM, Berendse F, de Kroon H (2010) Unveiling below-ground species abundance in a biodiversity experiment: a test of vertical niche differentiation among grassland species. J Ecol 98:1117–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nicotra AB, Babicka N, Westoby M (2002) Seedling root anatomy and morphology: an examination of ecological differentiation with rainfall using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Oecologia 130:136–145Google Scholar
  36. Novoplansky A, Goldberg DE (2001) Effects of water pulsing on individual performance and competitive hierarchies in plants. J Veg Sci 12:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ogle K, Reynolds JF (2004) Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays. Oecologia 141:282–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Padilla FM, Miranda J, Pugnaire FI (2007) Early root growth plasticity in seedlings of three Mediterranean woody species. Plant Soil 296:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Padilla FM, Miranda JD, Jorquera MJ, Pugnaire FI (2009) Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs. Plant Ecol 204:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patty L, Halloy SRP, Hiltbrunner E, Körner C (2010) Biomass allocation in herbaceous plants under grazing impact in the high semi-arid Andes. Flora 205:695–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol 193:30–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rind D, Goldberg R, Ruedy R (1989) Change in climate variability in the 21st-Century. Clim Chang 14:5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson TMP, Gross KL (2010) The impact of altered precipitation variability on annual weed species. Am J Bot 97:1625–1629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ (2006) Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1569–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwinning S, Starr BI, Ehleringer JR (2003) Dominant cold desert plants do not partition warm season precipitation by event size. Oecologia 136:252–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwinning S, Sala OE, Loik ME, Ehleringer JR (2004) Thresholds, memory, and seasonality: understanding pulse dynamics in arid/semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:191–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sher AA, Goldberg DE, Novoplansky A (2004) The effect of mean and variance in resource supply on survival of annuals from Mediterranean and desert environments. Oecologia 141:353–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (2001) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. van der Hurk B, Tank AK, Lenderink G, van Ulden A, van Oldenborgh GJ, Katsman C, van den Brink H, Keller F, Bessembinder J, Burgers G, Komen G, Hazeleger W, Drijfhout S (2006) KNMI Climate Change Scenarios 2006 for the Netherlands. KNMI, De Bilt, p 82Google Scholar
  50. Van der Krift TAJ, Berendse F (2002) Root life spans of four grass species from habitats differing in nutrient availability. Funct Ecol 16:198–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Ruijven J, Berendse F (2005) Diversity-productivity relationships: Initial effects, long-term patterns, and underlying mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:695–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Ruijven J, Berendse F (2009) Long-term persistence of a positive plant diversity-productivity relationship in the absence of legumes. Oikos 118:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Ruijven J, Berendse F (2010) Diversity enhances community recovery, but not resistance, after drought. J Ecol 98:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2001) Differentiation in populations of Hordeum spontaneum Koch along a gradient of environmental productivity and predictability: plasticity in response to water and nutrient stress. Biol J Linn Soc 75:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wan C, Yilmaz I, Sosebee RE (2002) Seasonal soil-water availability influences snakeweed root dynamics. J Arid Environ 51:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang L, de Kroon H, Smits AJM (2007) Combined effects of partial root drying and patchy fertilizer placement on nutrient acquisition and growth of oilseed rape. Plant Soil 295:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, Haddad BM, Harte J, Huxman TE, Knapp AK, Lin G, Pockman WT, Shaw MR, Small EE, Smith MD, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC (2003) Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. BioScience 53:941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams KJ, Wilsey BJ, McNaughton SJ, Banyikwa FF (1998) Temporally variable rainfall does not limit yields of Serengeti grasses. Oikos 81:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright IJ, Westoby M (1999) Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients. J Ecol 87:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zavaleta ES, Shaw MR, Chiariello NR, Thomas BD, Cleland EE, Field CB, Mooney HA (2003) Grassland responses to three years of elevated temperature, CO2, precipitation, and N deposition. Ecol Monogr 73:585–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco M. Padilla
    • 1
    • 3
  • Bart H. J. Aarts
    • 1
  • Yvonne O. A. Roijendijk
    • 1
  • Hannie de Caluwe
    • 1
  • Liesje Mommer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric J. W. Visser
    • 1
  • Hans de Kroon
    • 1
  1. 1.Experimental Plant Ecology, Institute for Water and Wetland ResearchRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Nature Conservation and Plant EcologyWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Departamento de AgronomíaUniversidad de AlmeríaLa CañadaSpain

Personalised recommendations