Root plasticity maintains growth of temperate grassland species under pulsed water supply
- 881 Downloads
Background and aims
The frequency of rain is predicted to change in high latitude areas with more precipitation in heavy, intense events interspersed by longer dry periods. These changes will modify soil drying cycles with unknown consequences for plant performance of temperate species.
We studied plant growth and root traits of juveniles of four grasses and four dicots growing in a greenhouse, when supplying the same total amount of water given either regular every other day or pulsed once a week.
Pulsed water supply replenished soil moisture immediately after watering, but caused substantial drought stress at the end of the watering cycle, whereas regular watering caused more moderate but consistent drought. Grasses had lower water use efficiency in the pulsed watering compared to regular watering, whereas dicots showed no difference. Both grasses and dicots developed thinner roots, thus higher specific root length, and greater root length in the pulsed watering. Growth of dicots was slightly increased under pulsed watering.
Temperate species coped with pulsed water supply by eliciting two responses: i) persistent shoot growth, most likely by maximizing growth at peaks of soil moisture, thus compensating for slower growth during drought periods; ii) plasticity of root traits related to increased resource uptake. Both responses likely account for subtle improvement of growth under changed water supply conditions.
KeywordsClimate change δ13C Water heterogeneity Water use efficiency Specific root length
We thank Marloes Hendriks and Janneke Ravenek for help with root scanning, the staff of the Experimental Garden (IWWR, FNWI) of the Radboud University Nijmegen for taking care of the plants, Dr. Iván Prieto and three anonymous referees for reviewing earlier drafts. FMP was supported by a postdoc grant of the Spanish Ministry of Education.
- Bresser AHM, Berk MM, van den Born GJ, van Bree L, van Gaalen FW, Ligtvoet W, van Minnen JG, Witmer MCH (2005) The effects of climate change in the Netherlands. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, p 111Google Scholar
- Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Manéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional Climate Projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 847–940Google Scholar
- Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Mooney HA, Canadell JG (2002) C3 and C4 photosynthesis in encyclopedia of global environmental. Vol. II. Change the earth system: biological and ecological dimensions of global environmental change. Wiley, Chichester, pp 186–190Google Scholar
- Euro+Med 2006 Euro+Med PlantBase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. Published on the Internet http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/
- Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle-size analysis. In: Dane JH, Toppe GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4 Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 255–294Google Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Geneva (Switzerland). pp 0-104Google Scholar
- Klimešová J, Limeš LK (1996) Effects of rhizome age and nutrient availability on carbohydrate reserves in Rumex alpinus rhizomes. Biologia 51:457–461Google Scholar
- Mommer L, van Ruijven J, de Caluwe H, Smit-Tiekstra AE, Wagemaker CAM, Ouborg NJ, Bögemann GM, van der Weerden GM, Berendse F, de Kroon H (2010) Unveiling below-ground species abundance in a biodiversity experiment: a test of vertical niche differentiation among grassland species. J Ecol 98:1117–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nicotra AB, Babicka N, Westoby M (2002) Seedling root anatomy and morphology: an examination of ecological differentiation with rainfall using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Oecologia 130:136–145Google Scholar
- Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (2001) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- van der Hurk B, Tank AK, Lenderink G, van Ulden A, van Oldenborgh GJ, Katsman C, van den Brink H, Keller F, Bessembinder J, Burgers G, Komen G, Hazeleger W, Drijfhout S (2006) KNMI Climate Change Scenarios 2006 for the Netherlands. KNMI, De Bilt, p 82Google Scholar
- Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, Haddad BM, Harte J, Huxman TE, Knapp AK, Lin G, Pockman WT, Shaw MR, Small EE, Smith MD, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC (2003) Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. BioScience 53:941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar