How useful is the mutualism-parasitism continuum of arbuscular mycorrhizal functioning?
- 1.4k Downloads
A recent review in this journal puts forward the premise that our recent studies have resulted in our questioning the validity of the so-called mutualism-parasitism continuum of functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizas. This premise is incorrect and appears largely to result from a misunderstanding of terminology.
Scope and conclusions
We clarify a comment in one of our publications that influenced the previous review, which contains several statements that do not accurately represent our views. Our research has overturned not the continuum concept itself, but some past ideas about the balance of resources traded between AM fungi and plants. Of course, we recognize that outcomes of AM symbiosis in relation to the non-mycorrhizal (NM) state are strongly influenced by many environmental factors. Nevertheless, underlying resource trade is always a key determinant of costs and benefits of the symbiosis for both partners. In this context, we address uncertainties and contradictory ideas about mechanisms, causes, effects and outcomes in AM symbioses that occur in the literature, and issues of relevance of research at different scales. We also discuss semantics that can cause confusion. Finally, we assess how useful the mutualism-parasitism continuum is for design of hypothesis-driven experiments to disentangle the complex interactions that determine growth of AM plants, i.e. the so-called emergent properties.
KeywordsArbuscular mycorrhizas Benefits Costs Mycorrhizal growth response Resource trade Mutualism Parasitism
Mycorrhizal growth response
We thank the editors of Plant and Soil for inviting us to produce this contribution, clarify the aims of our research, and explore further some important conceptual issues raised by Johnson and Graham (2012). We are grateful to members of the Adelaide group whose studies have contributed to ideas in “Smiths” papers, to our colleague Iver Jakobsen, to our other co-authors, and not least to other colleagues who are interested in the physiology of AM symbiosis and the extent to which it can be validly extrapolated to higher scales of research.
- Baylis GTS (1975) The magnolioid mycorrhiza and mycotrophy in root systems derived from it. In: Sanders FE, Mosse B, Tinker PB (eds) Endomycorrhizas. Academic, London, UK, pp 373–389Google Scholar
- Cavagnaro TR, Smith FA, Hay G, Carne-Cavagnaro VL, Smith SE (2004) Inoculum type does not affect overall resistance of an arbuscular mycorrhiza-defective tomato mutant to colonisation but inoculation does change competitive interactions with wild-type tomato. New Phytol 161:485–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graham JH (2000) Assessing costs of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in agroecosystems. In: Podila GK, Douds DD (eds) Current advances in mycorrhizae research. APS Press, St Paul, pp 127–140Google Scholar
- Jakobsen I (1994) Research approaches to study the functioning of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas in the field. Plant Soil 159:141–147Google Scholar
- Jakobsen I (1999) Transport of phosphorus and carbon in arbuscular mycorrhizas. In: Varma A, Hock B (eds) Mycorrhiza: structure, function, molecular biology and biotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–332Google Scholar
- Johnson NC, Graham JH (2012) The continuum concept remains a useful framework for studying mycorrhizal functioning. Plant Soil. doi: 10.1007/s11104-11012-11406-11101
- Klironomos JN (2000) Host specificity and functional diversity among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In Microbial Biosystems: In: Bell CR, Brylinsky M, Johnson-Green P (eds) New Frontiers: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology. Atlantic Canada Society for Microbial Ecology, Halifax, Canada, pp 845–851Google Scholar
- Lewis DH (1974) Microorganisms and plants: the evolution of parasitism and mutualism. Symp Soc Exp Biol 24:367–392Google Scholar
- Read DJ (2002) Towards ecological relevance-progress and pitfalls in the path towards and understanding of mycorrhizal functions in nature. In: Sanders IR, van der Heijden MGA (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 3–29Google Scholar
- Smith SE, Jakobsen I, Groenlund M, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol 156:1050–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trappe JM (1994) What is a mycorrhiza? In: Azcon-Aguilar C, Barea JM (eds) Fourth European Symposium on Mycorrhizae Granada, Spain. Commission of the European Union, Luxemburg, pp 3–6Google Scholar