Grassland cutting regimes affect soil properties, and consequently vegetation composition and belowground plant traits
Background and aims
Machine mowing, mimicking the traditional hand mowing, is often used as a successful management tool to maintain grassland biodiversity, but few studies have investigated the long-term effects of traditional versus mechanical mowing of plant communities. Machine mowing as opposed to hand mowing causes soil compaction and reduction of soil aeration. In response, we expected strong effects on below-ground plant traits: root aerenchyma formation and superficial root growth, and no specific effects on aboveground traits. Effects were expected to be more pronounced in soils vulnerable to compaction.
We evaluated the changes in above- and belowground plant traits in a long-term (38-year) experiment with annual hand-mowing and machine-mowing management regimes on two different soil types: a coarse structured sandy soil and a finer structured sandy-organic soil
Only on the organic soil, long-term machine mowing leads to lower soil aeration (more compacted soil) and a marked change in the belowground trait distribution of the plant community. Here we find a higher cover of superficially rooting species and marginally significant lower cover of species without morphological adaptations to soil hypoxia, but no effect on species with a high capacity of forming aerenchyma.
Mowing with heavy machines on soils vulnerable to compaction affect the vegetation according to changes in soil physical conditions. This is reflected in a shift towards communities with greater proportion of superficially rooting species. Our results illustrate the sensitivity of grasslands to slight changes in the management regime.
KeywordsMowing Soil redox potential Aerenchyma Rooting depth Aboveground traits Long-term experiment
We thank the nature conservation agency State Forestry Commission for permission to work in the nature reserve Stroomdallandschap Drentsche Aa (SBB), as well as Pieter Heijning and Marten Staal for their help with field work and lab work. We further thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work has been made possible thanks to the support of VC from the European Science Foundation (ESF) under the EUROCORES Programme EuroDIVERSITY, through contract No. ERAS-CT-2003-980409 of the European Commission, DG Research, FP6.
- Baayen RH (2011) languageR: data sets and functions with “Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.2Google Scholar
- Bakker JP, Elzinga JA, de Vries Y (2002) Effects of long-term cutting in a grassland system: perspectives for restoration of plant communities on nutrient-poor soils. Appl Veg Sci 5:107–120Google Scholar
- Bates D (2011) Linear mixed model implementation in lme4. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/vignettes/Implementation.pdf
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0999375-39Google Scholar
- Dierschke H, Wittig B (1991) Die Vegetation des Holtumer Moores (Nordwest-Deutschland). Veränderungen in 25 Jahren (1963–1988). Tuexenia 11:171–190Google Scholar
- Douma JC, Aerts R, Witte JPM, Bekker RM, Kunzmann D, Metselaar K, van Bodegom PM (2011) A combination of functionally different plant traits provides a means to quantitatively predict a broad range of species assemblages in NW Europe. Ecography 35:294–305Google Scholar
- Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Paulissen D, Werner W, Düll R (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica 18:1–248Google Scholar
- Elzenga JTM, van Veen H (2010) Waterlogging and plant nutrient uptake. In: Mancuso S, Shabala S (eds) Waterlogging, signalling and tolerance in plants. Springer-Verlag Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Gerrard J (1982) The use of hand-operated soil penetrometers. Area 14:227–234Google Scholar
- Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates Inc., SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J, Cobb P, Firbank L, Kull T, McCracken D, Moritz RFA, Niemela J, Rebane M, Wascher D, Watt A, Young J (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. 347. Univ. of Calif. Agric. Station, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Jafarzadeh F (2006) Dynamic compaction method in physical model tests. Scientia Iranica 13:187–192Google Scholar
- Kleyer M, Bekker RM, Knevel IC, Bakker JP, Thompson K, Sonnenschein M, Poschlod P, van Groenendael JM, Klimes L, Klimesova J, Klotz S, Rusch GM, Hermy M, Adriaens D, Boedeltje G, Bossuyt B, Dannemann A, Endels P, Gotzenberger L, Hodgson JG, Jackel AK, Kuhn I, Kunzmann D, Ozinga WA, Romermann C, Stadler M, Schlegelmilch J, Steendam HJ, Tackenberg O, Wilmann B, Cornelissen JHC, Eriksson O, Garnier E, Peco B (2008) The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life-history traits of the Northwest European flora. J Ecol 96:1266–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lavorel S, Grigulis K, McIntyre S, Williams NSG, Garden D, Dorrough J, Berman S, Quetier F, Thebault A, Bonis A (2008) Assessing functional diversity in the field—methodology matters! Funct Ecol 22:134–147Google Scholar
- Lehsten V (2005) Functional analysis and modelling of vegetation—plant functional types in a mesocosmos experiment and a mechanistic model. University of Oldenburg, OldenburgGoogle Scholar
- Ponnamperuma FN (1984) Effect of flooding on soils. In: Koalowski TT (ed) Flooding and plant growth. Academic, New York, pp 9–45Google Scholar
- RDCT (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
- Strykstra RJ, Verweij GL, Bakker JP (1997) Seed dispersal by mowing machinery in a Dutch brook valley system. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 46:387–401Google Scholar
- Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
- Van Straalen NM, Rijninks PC (1982) The efficiency of Tullgren apparatus with respect to interpreting seasonal-changes in age structure of soil arthropod populations. Pedobiologia 24:197–209Google Scholar
- von Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E, Sobotik M (1982) Wurzelatlas mitteleuropaischer Grundlandpflanzen. G. Fischer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar