Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 356, Issue 1–2, pp 231–243 | Cite as

Survival of endophytic bacteria in polymer-based inoculants and efficiency of their application to sugarcane

  • Marinete Flores da Silva
  • Cecília de Souza Antônio
  • Paulo Jansen de Oliveira
  • Gustavo Ribeiro Xavier
  • Norma Gouvêa Rumjanek
  • Luis Henrique de Barros Soares
  • Veronica Massena Reis
Regular Article

Abstract

Background & aims

Studies have been conducted to evaluate maintenance of cell viability and stability, as well as to select cheap carriers to extend the shelf life of plant beneficial bacterial inoculants for agricultural crops. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shelf life and the colonization efficiency of novel liquid and gel-based inoculant formulations for sugarcane. The different inoculant formulations were all composed of a mixture of five strains of diazotrophic bacteria (Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, Herbaspirillum seropedicae, H. rubrisubalbicans, Azospirillum amazonense and Burkholderia tropica), which are recognized as sugarcane growth promoters.

Methods

Different inoculant formulations containing as carrier the polymers carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and corn starch (60/40 ratio) at five different concentrations (named PIC, for Polymeric Inoculant Carrier) were supplemented, or not, with 2 % MgO, an interfacial stabilizing agent. Bacterial survival in the different formulations during storage was evaluated under controlled conditions, and two experiments with mini-cuttings of sugarcane variety RB72454 were carried out under greenhouse conditions.

Results

Laboratory tests showed that in the formulation composed of 0.8 g of the polymeric mixture per 100 g of the final product (PIC 0.8), survival of G. diazotrophicus and A. amazonense was around 109 CFU∙mL−1 after 120 days of storage, regardless of the supplementation with MgO. The other formulation (2.2 g of polymeric mixture, PIC 2.2) presented survival levels of 108 CFU∙mL−1 for up to 60 days of storage for all the individual strains. In the greenhouse, sugarcane seedlings showed a positive growth response 50 days after inoculation when inoculated with the mixture of five bacteria, with and without PIC 2.2.

Conclusions

The polymer carriers described here allowed for the long-term survival of the five different bacterial strains tested. In addition, short-term experiments in the greenhouse showed that their application as part of an inoculant on sugarcane cuttings was at least as effective in terms of bacterial colonization and the promotion of plant growth as that of the bacterial mixture without carriers.

Keywords

Inoculants Colonization Microorganisms PGPB Poaceae 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária—Embrapa grant number 03.08.06.001, National Researcher Council (CNPq) grant number 475754/2008-5, Rio de Janeiro Researcher Foundation (FAPERJ) grant number E- 26/112.020/2008. Also the PhD and MS researcher fellowships of the students and Faperj “Bolsa Cientista do Nosso Estado” of (FAPERJ) and CNPq of the researchers. The authors wish to thank Dr. Robert Michael Boddey for his kind revision of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11104_2012_1242_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (173 kb)
Fig. S1 (PDF 173 kb)
11104_2012_1242_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (173 kb)
Fig. S2 (PDF 172 kb)
11104_2012_1242_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (177 kb)
Fig. S3 (PDF 176 kb)
11104_2012_1242_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (164 kb)
Fig. S4 (PDF 163 kb)
11104_2012_1242_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (171 kb)
Fig. S5 (PDF 171 kb)

References

  1. Albareda M, Rodrigues-Navarro DN, Camacho M, Temprano FJ (2008) Alternatives to peat as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants: solid and liquid formulations. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2771–2779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashan Y, Hernandez J-P, Leyva LA, Bacilio M (2002) Alginate microbeads as inoculant carriers for plant growth-promoting bacteria. Biol Fertil Soil 35:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldani JI, Baldani VLD, Seldin L, Döbereiner J (1986) Characterization of Herbaspirillum seropedicae gen. nov., sp. nov., a root-associated nitrogen-fixing bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldani JI, Pot B, Kirchhof G, Falsen E, Baldani VLD, Olivares FL, Hoste B, Kersters K, Hartmann A, Gillis M, Döbereiner J (1996) Emended description of Herbaspirillum; a mild plant pathogen, as Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans comb. nov.; and classification of a group of clinical isolates (EF group 1) as Herbaspirillum species 3. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:802–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg G (2009) Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:11–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Alves BJR, Reis VM (2003) Endophytic nitrogen fixation in sugarcane: present knowledge and future applications. Plant Soil 252:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damann KE Jr, Benda GTA (1983) Evaluation of commercial heat-treatment methods for control of ratoon stunting disease of sugarcane. Plant Disease 67:966–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deaker R, Roughley JD, Kennedy IV (2004) Legume seed inoculation technology: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Döbereiner J (1995) Isolation and identification of aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria from soil and plants. In: Alef J, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic, London, pp 134–141Google Scholar
  10. Fernandes-Júnior PI, Rohr TG, Oliveira PJ, Xavier GR, Rumjanek NG (2009) Polymers as carriers for rhizobial inoculant formulations. Pesq Agropec Bras 44:1184–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira JS, Sabino DCC, Guimarães SL, Baldani JI, Baldani VLD (2003) Seleção de veículos para o preparo de inoculante com bactérias diazotróficas para arroz inundado. Rev Agron 37:6–12Google Scholar
  12. Ferreira JS, Baldani JI, Baldani VLD (2010) Seleção de inoculantes à base de turfa contendo bactériasdiazotróficas em duas variedades de arroz. Acta Sci Agron 32:179–185Google Scholar
  13. Guedes HV, dos Santos ST, Perin L, Teixeira KRD, Reis VM, Baldani JI (2008) Polyphasic characterization of Gluconacetobacterdiazotrophicus isolates obtained from different sugarcane varieties. Braz J Microbiol 39:718–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gyaneshwar P, James EK, Reddy PM, Ladha J (2002) Herbaspirillum colonization increases growth and nitrogen accumulation in aluminium tolerant rice varieties. New Phytol 154:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartmann A, Fu H, Burris RH (1986) Regulation of nitrogenase activity by ammonium chloride in Azospirillum spp. J Bacteriol 165:864–870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardoim PR, Van Overbeek LS, Van Elsas JD (2008) Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol 16:463–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herridge DF, Peoples M, Boddey RM (2008) Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil 311:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen ES, Peoples M, Boddey RM, Gresshoff PM, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Alves BJR, Morrison M (2012) Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. A review. Agron Sustain Dev (in press, doi:  10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7)
  19. Magalhães FM, Baldani JI, Souto SM, Kuykendall JR, Döbereiner J (1983) A new acid-tolerant Azospirillum species. Acad Brasil Ciênc 55:417–430Google Scholar
  20. Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Lakshminarasimhan C (1999) Influence of N fertilisation on the isolation of Acetobacter diazotrophicus and Herbaspirillum spp. from Indian sugarcane varieties. Biol Fertil Soils 29:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muthukumarasamy R, Govindarajan M, Vadivelu M, Revathi G (2006) N-fertilizer saving by inoculation of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and Herbaspirillum sp. in micropropagated sugarcane plants. Microbiol Res 161:238–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Njoloma J, Tanaka K, Shimizu T, Nishiguchi T, Zackria M, Akashi R, Oota M, Akao S (2008) Infection and colonization of aseptically micropropagated sugarcane seedlings by nitrogen fixing endophytic bacterium, Herbaspirillum sp. B501 gfp1. Biol Fertil Soil 43:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olivares FL, Baldani VLD, Reis VM, Baldani JI, Döbereiner J (1996) Occurrence of the endophytic diazotrophs Herbaspirillum spp. in roots, stems and leaves predominantly of gramineae. Biol Fertil Soils 2:197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliveira ALM, Urquiaga S, Döbereiner J, Baldani JI (2002) The effect of inoculating endophytic N2-fixing bacteria on micropropagated sugarcane plants. Plant Soil 242:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliveira ALM, Canuto EL, Urquiaga S, Reis VM, Baldani JI (2006) Yield of micropropagated sugarcane varieties in different soil types following inoculation with diazotrophic bacteria. Plant Soil 284:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliveira ALM, Stoffels M, Schmid M, Reis VM, Baldani JI, Hartmann A (2009) Colonization of sugarcane plantlets by mixed inoculations with diazotrophic bacteria. Eur J Soil Biol 45:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pandey P, Maheshwari DK (2007) Bioformulation of Burkholderia sp. MSSP with a multispecies consortium for growth promotion of Cajanus cajan. Can J Microbiol 53:213–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pochon J, Tardieux P (1962) Techniques d’analyse en microbiologie du sol. Éditions de la Tourelle, St Mandé (Seine). p 105Google Scholar
  29. Pimental JP, Olivares F, Pitard RM, Urquiaga S, Akiba F, Döbereiner J (1991) Dinitrogen-fixation and infection of grass leaves by Pseudomonas rubrisubalbicans and Herbaspirillum seropedicae. Plant Soil 137:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pukanszky B (2005) Interfaces and interphases in multicomponent materials: past, present and future. Eur Polymer J 41:645–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reis VM, Olivares FL, Döbereiner J (1994) Improved methodology for isolation of Acetobacter diazotrophicus and confirmation of its endophytic habitat. W J Microbiol Biotechnol 10:401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reis VM, Estrada-de-Los-Santos P, Tenorio-Salgado S, Volgel J, Stoffels S, Guyon S, Mavingui P, Baldani VLD, Schmid M, Baldani JI, Balandreau J, Hartmann A, Caballero-Mellado J (2004) Burkholderia tropica sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing, plant-associated bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:2155–2162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stephan MP, Oliveira M, Teixeira KRS, Martinez-Drets G, Döbereiner J (1991) Physiology and dinitrogen fixation of Acetobacter diazotrophicus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snedecor GW, Cochran GW (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 507Google Scholar
  35. Tillett HE (1987) Most probable number of organisms: revised tables for the multiple tube method. Epidem Inf 99:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urquiaga S, Cruz KHS, Boddey RM (1992) Contribution of nitrogen fixation to sugarcane: nitrogen-15 and nitrogen balance estimates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vendan RT, Thangajaru M (2007) Development and standardization of cyst based liquid formulation of Azospirillum bioinoculant. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 54:167–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marinete Flores da Silva
    • 1
  • Cecília de Souza Antônio
    • 1
  • Paulo Jansen de Oliveira
    • 2
  • Gustavo Ribeiro Xavier
    • 3
  • Norma Gouvêa Rumjanek
    • 3
  • Luis Henrique de Barros Soares
    • 3
  • Veronica Massena Reis
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Soil SciencesUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)SeropédicaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringUFRRJSeropédicaBrazil
  3. 3.Embrapa AgrobiologiaSeropédicaBrazil

Personalised recommendations