Conservation agriculture, increased organic carbon in the top-soil macro-aggregates and reduced soil CO2 emissions
- 1k Downloads
Background and aims
Conservation agriculture, the combination of minimal soil movement (zero or reduced tillage), crop residue retention and crop rotation, might have the potential to increase soil organic C content and reduce emissions of CO2.
Three management factors were analyzed: (1) tillage (zero tillage (ZT) or conventional tillage (CT)), (2) crop rotation (wheat monoculture (W), maize monoculture (M) and maize-wheat rotation (R)), and (3) residue management (with (+r), or without (−r) crop residues). Samples were taken from the 0–5 and 5–10 cm soil layers and separated in micro-aggregates (< 0.25 mm), small macro-aggregates (0.25 to 1 mm) and large macro-aggregates (1 to 8 mm). The carbon content of each aggregate fraction was determined.
Zero tillage combined with crop rotation and crop residues retention resulted in a higher proportion of macro-aggregates. In the 0–5 cm layer, plots with a crop rotation and monoculture of maize and wheat in ZT+r had the greatest proportion of large stable macro-aggregates (40%) and highest mean weighted diameter (MWD) (1.7 mm). The plots with CT had the largest proportion of micro-aggregates (27%). In the 5–10 cm layer, plots with residue retention in both CT and ZT (maize 1 mm and wheat 1.5 mm) or with monoculture of wheat in plots under ZT without residues (1.4 mm) had the greatest MWD. The 0–10 cm soil layer had a greater proportion of small macroaggregates compared to large macro-aggregates and micro-aggregates. In the 0–10 cm layer of soil with residues retention and maize or wheat, the greatest C content was found in the small and large macro-aggregates. The small macro-aggregates contributed most C to the organic C of the sample. For soil cultivated with maize, the CT treatments had significantly higher CO2 emissions than the ZT treatments. For soil cultivated with wheat, CTR-r had significantly higher CO2 emissions than all other treatments.
Reduction in soil disturbance combined with residue retention increased the C retained in the small and large macro-aggregates of the top soil due to greater aggregate stability and reduced the emissions of CO2 compared with conventional tillage without residues retention and maize monoculture (a cultivation system normally used in the central highlands of Mexico).
KeywordsAggregate stability Soil CO2 emissions Zero tillage
Mariela Fuentes received a PhD fellowship from CONACYT. Fieldwork was done in a long-term trial established by Dr. R.A. Fisher at CIMMYT’s El Batán research station. The research was supported by CIMMYT and its strategic donors and forms part of the strategic research network developed in the frame of MasAgro (Modernización sustentable de la agricultura tradicional), component ‘Desarrollo sustentable con el productor’. The authors thank M. Martinez, A. Martinez, and H. González-Juárez for help with the field work.
- Black AL, Tanaka DL (1997) A conservation tillage-cropping study in the Northern Great Plains of the United States. In: Paul EA, Paustian K, Elliot ET, Cole CV (eds) Soil organic matter in temperate agroecosystems long-term experiments in North America. CRC, New York, pp 335–342Google Scholar
- Denef K, Six J, Merckx R, Paustian K (2004) Carbon sequestration in microaggregates of no-tillage soils with different clay mineralogy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1935–1944Google Scholar
- Elliott ET (1986) Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. SSSAJ 50:627–633Google Scholar
- Institute SAS (1994) SAS user’s guide. SAS Inst, CaryGoogle Scholar
- Kemper W, Rosenau R (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A, Campbell G, Jackson R, Mortland M, Nielsen D (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part I. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 425–442Google Scholar
- Nouchi I, Yonemura S (2008) CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes from soybean and barley double cropping in relation to tillage in Japan. Phyton-Ann Rei Bot 45:327–338Google Scholar
- Osozawa S, Hasegawa S (1995) Daily and seasonal changes in soil carbon dioxide concentration and flux in Andisol. Soil Sci 160:117–124Google Scholar
- Rasmussen PE, Smiley RW (1997) Soil carbon and nitrogen change in log-term agricultural experiments at Pendleton, Oregon. In: Paul EA, Paustian K, Elliot ET, Cole CV (eds) Soil organic matter in temperate agroecosystems long-term experiments in North America. CRC, New York, pp 353–360Google Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff (2003) Keys to Soil Taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington DC, pp 332Google Scholar
- Stewart C, Plante A, Paustian K, Conant R, Six J (2008) Soil Carbon Saturation: Linking concept and measurable carbon pools. SSSAJ 72:379–392Google Scholar
- Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 62:141–163Google Scholar
- Wright AL, Hons FM (2005) Soil Carbon and nitrogen storage in aggregates from different tillage and crop regimes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:141–147Google Scholar