Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 353, Issue 1–2, pp 85–94 | Cite as

The effect of chemical fertilizer on soil organic carbon renewal and CO2 emission—a pot experiment with maize

  • Wei Gong
  • Xiaoyuan Yan
  • Jingyan Wang
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and Aims

Previous studies have clearly shown substantial increases of soil organic carbon (SOC) in agricultural soils of Yellow River reaches. Those soils did not receive organic fertilizer input, but did receive chemical fertilizer inputs. Thus, to investigate the hypothesis that the observed SOC increases were driven by chemical fertilizer additions, a maize pot experiment was conducted using a Fluvisol that developed under C3 vegetation in the Yellow River reaches.

Methods

Using the natural 13C abundance method we calculated the SOC renewal ratio (C renewal), and separated total soil organic carbon (TOC) into maize-derived soil organic carbon (SOCmaize) and original soil organic carbon (SOCoriginal). Carbon dioxide fluxes and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were determined by closed chamber method and fumigation-extraction method, respectively. The experiment included five treatments: (1) NPK: application of chemical fertilizer NPK; (2) NP, application of chemical fertilizer NP; (3) PK: application of chemical fertilizer PK; (4) NK, application of chemical fertilizer NK; and (5) CK: unfertilized control.

Results

Fertilization increased maize biomass (including grain, straw and root), TOC, C renewal, SOCmaize, maize-derived carbon (MDC: including SOCmaize, and root and stubble biomass carbon) and MBC, and these values among the treatments ranked NPK>NP>PK>NK>CK. The C renewal was 5.54–8.50% across the treatments. Fertilization also increased soil CO2 emission (including root respiration and SOCoriginal decomposition), while the SOCoriginal decomposition during the maize growing season only amounted to 74.0–93.4 and 33.5–46.1% of SOCmaize and MDC among the treatments, respectively. Thus input was larger than export, and led to SOC increase. Maize grain and straw biomass were positively and significantly correlated with soil δ13C, TOC, C renewal, SOCmaize, MDC and MBC.

Conclusions

The study suggests that chemical fertilizer application could increase C renewal by increasing crop-derived C and accelerating original SOC decomposition, and that as long as a certain level of crop yield or aboveground biomass can be achieved, application of chemical fertilizer alone can maintain or increase SOC level in Fluvisol in the Yellow River reaches.

Keywords

Chemical fertilizer δ13Carbon turnover Carbon sequestration Soil respiration 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.40621001) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. kzcx2-yw-q1-07, kzcx2-yw-312). We would like to thank Professors Yacheng Cao and Qiao Jiang for their technical assistance. We also thank three anonymous referees, section editor Johan Six and editor in chief Hans Lambers for their helpful comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript greatly.

References

  1. Amundson R (2001) The carbon budget in soils. Ann Rev Earth Plan Sci 29:535–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews JA, Harrison KG, Matamala R, Schlesinger WH (1999) Separation of root respiration from total soil respiration using carbon-13 labeling during free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE). Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1429–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angers DA, Voroney RP, Côté D (1995) Dynamics of soil organic matter and corn residues as affected by tillage practices. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1311–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balesdent J, Mariotti A, Guillet B (1987) Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 19:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balesdent J, Mariotti A (1996) Measurement of soil organic matter turnover using 13C natural abundance. In: Boutton TW, Yamasaki SI (eds) Mass spectrometry of soils. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 83–111Google Scholar
  6. Cheng W (1996) Measurement of rhizosphere respiration and organic matter decomposition using natural 13C. Plant Soil 183:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domanski G, Kuzyakov Y, Siniakina SV, Stahr K (2001) Carbon flows in the rhizosphere of ryegrass (Lolium perenne). J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 164:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fontaine S, Barot S, Barre P, Bdioui N, Mary B, Rumpel C (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450:277–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gong W, Yan X, Wang J, Hu T, Gong Y (2009) Long-term manuring and fertilization effects on soil organic carbon pools under a wheat–maize cropping system in North China Plain. Plant Soil 314:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregorich EG, Ellert BH, Drury CF, Liang BC (1996) Fertilization effects on soil organic matter turnover and corn residue C storage. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:472–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48:115–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hungate BA, Holland EA, Jackson RD, Chapin FS, Mooney HA, Field CB (1997) The fate of carbon in grasslands under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature 388:576–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larionova AA, Zolotareva BN, Yevdokimov IV, Sapronov DV, Kuzyakov YV, Buegger F (2008) The rates of organic matter renewal in gray forest soils and chernozems. Euras Soil Sci 41:1378–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lou YS, Li ZP, Zhang TL (2004) Carbon dioxide flux in a subtropical agricultural soil of China. Water Air Soil Poll 149:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu RS (1999) Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis methods. China agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Lu M, Zhou XH, Luo Y, Yang Y, Fang C, Chen J, Li B (2011) Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: a meta-analysis. Agric ecosyst environ 140:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant soil 129:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molkentin J (2009) Authentication of organic milk using δ13C and the r-linolenic acid content of milk fat. J Agric Food Chem 57:785–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Qian JH, Doran JW (1996) Available carbon released from crop roots during growth as determined by carbon-13 natural abundance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:828–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raich JW, Mora G (2005) Estimating root plus rhizosphere contributions to soil respiration in annual croplands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rochette P, Angers DA, Flanaga LB (1999a) Maize residue decomposition measurement using soil surface carbon dioxide fluxes and natural abundance of carbon-13. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1385–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rochette P, Flanagan LB, Gregorich EG (1999b) Separating soil respiration into plant and soil component using analyses of the natural abundance of carbon-13. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1207–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rouhier H, Billès G, Billès L, Bottner P (1996) Carbon fluxes in the rhizosphere of sweet chestnut seedlings (Castanea sativa) grown under two atmospheric CO2 concentrations: 14C partitioning after pulse labeling. Plant Soil 180:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rudrappa L, Purakayastha TJ, Singh D, Bhadraray S (2006) Long-term manuring and fertilization effects on soil organic carbon pools in a Typic Haplustept of semi-arid sub-tropical India. Soil Till Res 88:180–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan MC, Aravena R (1994) Combining 13C natural abundance and fumigation-extraction methods to investigate soil microbial biomass turnover. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1583–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith J, Smith P, Wattenbach M, Zaehle S, Hiederer R, Jones RJA, Montanarella L, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Ewert F (2005) Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990–2080. Global Change Biol 11:2141–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang WM, Zhang JQ, Wang WS, Cai DX, Zhang MR (1988) A study on the organic matter balance in the soil of farmlands in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Sci Agric Sin 21(1):19–26 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Wiant HV (1967) Has the contribution of litter decay to forest soil respiration been overestimated? J For 65:408–409Google Scholar
  32. Yan X, Cai Z, Wang S, Smith P (2011) Direct measurement of soil organic carbon content change in the croplands of China. Global Change Biol 17:1487–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang LF, Cai ZC (2006) Effects of growing maize and N application on the renewal of soil organic carbon. Acta Sci Circ 26(2):280–286 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Yang L, Cai Z, Qi S (2007) Effects of maize (Zea mays L.) growth and photosynthesis on δ13C in soil respiration. Fron Agric China 1(4):405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry EngineeringSichuan Agricultural UniversityYa’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations