The shift in plant species composition in a subarctic mountain birch forest floor due to climate change would modify the biogenic volatile organic compound emission profile
- 511 Downloads
Background and aims
Mountain birch forests dominate in the Subarctic but little is known of their non-methane biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions. The dwarf shrubs Empetrum hermaphroditum, Vaccinium myrtillus and Vaccinium uliginosum co-dominate in the forest floors of these forests. The abundance of these three dwarf shrubs relative to each other could be affected by climate warming expected to increase nutrient availability by accelerating litter decomposition and nutrient mineralization. We 1) compared the BVOC emission profiles of vegetation covers dominated by E. hermaphroditum and V. myrtillus plus V. uliginosum in a subarctic mountain birch forest floor, 2) distinguished the BVOCs emitted from plants and soil and 3) measured how the BVOC emissions from the different vegetation covers differed under darkness.
BVOCs were sampled during two growing seasons using a conventional ecosystem chamber-based method, collected on adsorbent and analyzed with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
High abundance of E. hermaphroditum increased the sesquiterpene emissions. Soil released fewer different BVOCs than controls (i.e. natural vegetation) but the total emission rates were similar. Darkness did not affect the emissions. Carbon emitted as BVOCs was less than 0.2% of the CO2 exchange.
Our results suggest that sesquiterpene emissions from subarctic mountain birch forest floors would be reduced following an increased abundance of V. myrtillus and V. uliginosum with climate change because these species respond rapidly to increased nutrient availability.
KeywordsBVOC Subarctic Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii Empetrum nigrum ssp. hermaphroditum Vaccinium myrtillus Vaccinium uliginosum
We thank Susan Owen for her comments that improved this paper, T. Oksanen for constructing the equipment and J. Tarhanen for assistance in the GC-MS analyses. The study was financially supported by the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, an EU ATANS grant (Fp6 506004), the Danish Council for Independent Research | Natural Sciences and the Abisko Scientific Research Station. P.F. acknowledges the support from the FQRNT, North Savo Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation and Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation.
- ACIA (2005) Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bäckstrand K, Crill PM, Mastepanov M, Christensen TR, Bastviken D (2008) Non-methane volatile organic compound flux from a subarctic mire in Northern Sweden. Tellus 60B:226–237Google Scholar
- Bliss LC, Matveyeva NV (1992) Circumpolar arctic vegetation. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate, an ecophysiological perspective. Academic, San Diego, pp 59–90Google Scholar
- Callaghan TV, Björn LO, Chernov Y, Chapin T, Christensen TR, Huntley B, Ims RA, Johansson M, Jolly D, Jonasson S, Matveyeva N, Panikov N, Oechel W, Shaver G, Elster J, Jónsdóttir IS, Laine K, Taulavuori K, Taulavuori E, Zöckler C (2004) Responses to projected changes in climate and UV-B at the species level. Ambio 33:418–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Faubert P, Tiiva P, Nakam TA, Holopainen JK, Holopainen T, Rinnan R (2011) Non-methane biogenic volatile organic compound emissions from boreal peatland microcosms under warming and water table drawdown. Biogeochemistry. doi: 10.1007/s10533-011-9578-y
- Hultén E, Fries M (1986) Atlas of north European vascular plants: north of the tropic of cancer. Koeltz Scientific Books, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kesselmeier J, Ciccioli P, Kuhn U, Stefani P, Biesenthal T, Rottenberger S, Wolf A, Vitullo M, Valentini R, Nobre A, Kabat P, Andreae MO (2002) Volatile organic compound emissions in relation to plant carbon fixation and the terrestrial carbon budget. Global Biogeochem Cycles 16(4):1126. doi: 10.1029/2001GB001813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuhn U, Andreae MO, Ammann C, Araújo AC, Brancaleoni E, Ciccioli P, Dindorf T, Frattoni M, Gatti LV, Ganzeveld L, Kruijt B, Lelieveld J, Lloyd J, Meixner FX, Nobre AD, Pöschl U, Spirig C, Stefani P, Thielmann A, Valentini R, Kesselmeier J (2007) Isoprene and monoterpene fluxes from Central Amazonian rainforest inferred from tower-based and airborne measurements, and implications on the atmospheric chemistry and the local carbon budget. Atmos Chem Phys 7:2855–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE, Shaver GR, Linkins AE (1992) Microbial processes and plant nutrient availability in arctic soils. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. An ecophysiological perspective. Academic, San Diego, pp 281–300Google Scholar
- Niinemets Ü, Kuhn U, Harley PC, Staudt M, Arneth A, Cescatti A, Ciccioli P, Copolovici L, Geron C, Guenther A, Kesselmeier J, Lerdau MT, Monson RK, Peñuelas J (2011) Estimations of isoprenoid emission capacity from enclosure studies: measurements, data processing, quality and standardized measurement protocols. Biogeosciences 8:2209–2246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rinne J, Bäck J, Hakola H (2009) Biogenic volatile organic compound emissions from the Eurasian taiga: current knowledge and future directions. Boreal Env Res 14:807–826Google Scholar
- Robinson CH, Michelsen A, Lee JA, Whitehead SJ, Callaghan TV, Press MC, Jonasson S (1997) Elevated atmospheric CO2 affects decomposition of Festuca vivipara (L.) Sm. litter and roots in experiments simulating environmental change in two contrasting arctic ecosystems. Global Change Biol 3:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tybirk K, Nilsson MC, Michelsen A, Kristensen HL, Shevtsova A, Strandberg MT, Johansson M, Nielsen KE, Rils-Nielsen T, Strandberg B, Johnsen I (2000) Nordic Empetrum dominated ecosystems: function and susceptibility to environmental changes. Ambio 29:90–97Google Scholar
- Van Wijk MT, Clemmensen KE, Shaver GR, Williams M, Callaghan TV, Chapin FS III, Cornelissen JHC, Gough L, Hobbie SE, Jonasson S, Lee JA, Michelsen A, Press MC, Richardson SJ, Rueth H (2004) Long-term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, Northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change. Global Change Biol 10:105–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker MD, Wahren CH, Hollister RD, Henry GHR, Ahlquist LE, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Calef MP, Callaghan TV, Carroll AB, Epstein HE, Jónsdóttir IS, Klein JA, Magnússon B, Molau U, Oberbauer SF, Rewa SP, Robinson CH, Shaver GR, Suding KN, Thompson CC, Tolvanen A, Totland Ø, Turner PL, Tweedie CE, Webber PJ, Wookey PA (2006) Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. PNAS 103:1342–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar