Availability of sparingly soluble phosphorus sources to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) with different forms of nitrogen as evaluated by a 32P isotopic dilution technique
Background & Aims
Previous studies revealed that cotton plants grown on soils with low available-P were accessing significant non-fertilizer P sources. This suggests that cotton can access stable-P pools from soil. This study examined cotton’s ability to utilize sparingly soluble P sources in comparison with wheat and white lupin.
Plants were grown for 45 days in a Vertosol supplied with AlPO4 and hydroxyapatite, and NH4-N or NO3-N. A 32P dilution technique was used to determine the availability and plant uptake of P from these P sources.
Three species differed substantially in P acquisition from the P sources. When averaged over N sources, the proportion of P in shoots sourced from AlPO4 was 89%, 54% and 19% for wheat, cotton and white lupin, respectively. When supplied hydroxyapatite, white lupin sourced 75% from the added P, in contrast to 36% for wheat and 17% for cotton. NH4-N nutrition increased the availability of hydroxyapatite to all the species and AlPO4 to cotton and white lupin.
Cotton is inefficient in utilizing sparingly soluble P while wheat is efficient in mobilising AlPO4 and white lupin is efficient in using hydroxyapatite. The superiority of wheat in AlPO4 utilization may be related with its high root length density.
Keywords15N Nitrogen form 32P dilution P acquisition Sparingly soluble P sources Species variation
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from La Trobe University and Cotton Research and Development Corporation. CT was also supported by the Australian Research Council (DP1093650).
- Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K, Yoshihara T, Johansen C (1990) Uptake mechanism of iron-associated phosphorus in pigeonpea growing on Indian Alfisol and its significance to phosphorus availability in cropping systems. In: 14th International Congress of Soil Science. Kyoto, pp 164–169 (International Society of Soil Science)Google Scholar
- Crozier CR, Walls B, Hardy DH, Barnes JS (2004) Response of cotton to P and K soil fertility gradients in North Carolina. J Cotton Sci 8:130–141Google Scholar
- Isbell RF (2002) The Australian soil classification (revised edition). CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Lindsay WL, Vlek PLG, Chien SH (1989) Phosphate minerals. In: Dixon JB, Weed SB (eds) Minerals in soil environment, 2nd edn. Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, pp 1089–1130Google Scholar
- Olsen SR, Dean LA (1965) Phosphorus. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, vol 2. Agron. Monogr. No. 9. Am. Soc. Agron, Madison, pp 1044–1047Google Scholar
- Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Tang C, Conyers MK, Nuruzzaman M, Poile GJ, Liu DL (2011) Biological amelioration of subsoil acidity through managing nitrate uptake by wheat crops. Plant Soil 338:383–397Google Scholar
- Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD (1985) Soil fertility and fertilizers, 4th edn. Macmillan Publishing Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wang X (2010) Phosphorus acquisition characteristics of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) compared with other crop species. PhD Thesis, La Trobe Univeristy, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar