Plant and Soil

, Volume 349, Issue 1–2, pp 203–214 | Cite as

Does low-intensity surface fire increase water- and nutrient-availability to overstorey Eucalyptus gomphocephala?

  • Dugald C. Close
  • Neil J. Davidson
  • Perry W. Swanborough
  • Ross Corkrey
Regular Article


The objective of this study was to investigate how the management practices of prescribed fire and understorey vegetation removal affect water and nutrient relations of old, yet prematurely declining Eucalyptus gomphocephala. Long unburnt sites were established in Yalgorup National Park, Western Australia, adjacent to frequently burnt state forest sites. Trees were allocated to vegetation clearing, prescribed fire or no prescribed fire treatments. Prescribed fire was achieved in only one long unburnt national park site so that the results were pseudoreplicated but analysed accordingly. Soil chemistry, plant nutrient availability and tree foliar carbon and nitrogen isotope ratio and nutrient concentration were investigated. No effects of vegetation clearing were found. Prescribed fire sites were associated with sky exposure and bare ground whereas no prescribed fire sites were associated with shrub and litter cover and litter depth. Foliar carbon isotope ratios were significantly more negative in prescribed fire, relative to no prescribed fire, treatments on long unburnt sites. Soil exchangeable Zn and Mn and plant available (estimated by charged resin beads) Mg were higher on prescribed fire, relative to no prescribed fire, long unburnt sites. Seedling bioassays indicated elevated P and Cu availability on prescribed fire, relative to no prescribed fire, treatments. In overstorey E. gomphocephala, foliar N levels were elevated (but not to excessive levels), and there was a trend toward elevated foliar Mn, in prescribed fire relative to no prescribed fire treatments on long unburnt sites. In the context of our large-scale pseudoreplicated case study, prescribed fire provided a pulse of water and N, (with some indications towards provision of elevated Mn, Cu and Mg) availability to E. gomphocephala in decline on sites with a history of a long absence of fire that may in part underpin observations of elevated tree health on sites that have a history of relatively frequent fire.


Ecophysiology Eucalyptus Prescribed fire Restoration 



We gratefully acknowledge funding support from the Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre and The Forest Fire Management Group (Department of Environment and Conservation—Western Australia, Department of Environment and Heritage—South Australia, Department of Sustainability and Environment—Victoria, Forestry Tasmania and Forests New South Wales). Darren Harvey managed the vegetation clearing operations, site preparation and prescribed fires. The fire management authority reference group: Rick Sneeuwjagt, Drew Haswell, Tony Blanks, Dr Tim Wardlaw, Craige Brown, Vic Jurskis, and Dr Paul Barber provided advice. We thank Dr Robert Archibald for technical assistance and Daan Lock (Arbor Oxygen) for foliar sampling. Soil and leaf nutrient analyses were conducted by the CSBP Analytical Laboratory, Perth, Western Australia. Isotope ratio analyses were conducted by the Research School of Biological Sciences laboratory, the Australian National University, Canberra.


  1. Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT (2002) Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol App 12:1418–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibald RD, Bradshaw J, Bowen BJ, Close DC, McCaw L, Drake PL, St. Hardy GEJ (2010) Understorey thinning and burning trials are needed in conservation reserves: the case of Tuart (Eucalyptus gomphocephala D.C.). Ecol Man Rest 11:108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bavaresco L, Giachino E, Colla R (1999) Iron chlorosis paradox in grapevine. J Plant Nutr 22:1689–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belbin L (2004) PATN Technical Reference. CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell T, Oliveras I (2006) Perceptions of prescribed burning in a local forest community in Victoria, Australia. Env Manage 38:867–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CALM (Department of Conservation and Land Management), Tuart Response Group, and Ecoscape, 2003. An atlas of tuart woodlands on the Swan Coastal Plain in Western Australia. Department of Conservation and Land Management, PerthGoogle Scholar
  7. Close DC, Davidson NJ, Watson T (2008) Health of remnant woodlands in fragments under distinct grazing regimes. Biol Cons 141:2395–2402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Close DC, Davidson NJ, Johnson DW, Abrams MD, Hart SC, Lunt ID, Archibald RD, Horton B, Adams MA (2009) Premature decline of Eucalyptus and altered ecosystem processes in the absence of fire in some Australian forests. Bot Rev 75:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Close DC, Davidson NJ, Swanborough P (2011) Fire history and understorey vegetation: water and nutrient relations of overstorey Eucalyptus delegatensis and E. gomphocephala. For Ecol Manage 262:208–214Google Scholar
  10. Cook GD (2001) Effect of frequent fires and grazing on stable nitrogen isotope ratios of vegetation in northern Australia. Aust Ecol 26:630–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Czerniakowski B, Crnov R, Smith IW, Luck JE (2006) Soil properties associated with the tree decline ‘Mundulla Yellows’. Plant Soil 285:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson NJ, Close DC, Battaglia M, Churchill K, Ottenschlarger M, Watson T, Bruce J (2007) Eucalypt health and agricultural land management within bushland remnants in the Midlands of Tasmania, Australia. Biol Conserv 139:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodson EK, Peterson DW, Harrod RJ (2008) Understorey vegetation response to thinning and burning restoration treatments in dry conifer forests of the eastern Cascades, USA. For Ecol Manage 255:3130–3140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis RC (1971) Dieback of alpine ash as related to changes in soil temperature. Aust For 35:152–163Google Scholar
  15. Ellis RC (1985) The relationships among eucalypt forest, grassland and rainforest in a highland area in north-eastern Tasmania. Aust J Ecol 10:297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis RC, Mount AB, Mattay JB (1980) Recovery of Eucalyptus delegatensis from high altitude dieback after felling and burning the understorey. Aust For 43:29–35Google Scholar
  17. Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:539–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feeney SR, Kolb TE, Wagner MR, Covington WW (1998) Influence of thinning and burning restoration treatments on pre-settlement ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Can J For Res 28:1295–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernández V, Ebert G (2005) Foliar iron fertilization: a critical review. J Plant Nutr 28:2113–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garnett TP, Smethurst PJ (1999) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by Eucalyptus nitens: effects of pH and temperature. Plant Soil 214:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giblin AE, Laundre JA, Nadelhoffer KJ, Shaver GR (1994) Measuring nutrient availability in arctic soils using ion-exchange resins—a field-test. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1154–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gonzalez Parra J, Cala Riveroand V, Iglesias Lopez T (1996) Forms of Mn in soils affected by a forest fire. Sci Total Environ 181:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grigg A, Close DC, Lambers H, Ruthroff KX, Dixon KW (2009) Ecophysiology of Eucalyptus marginata and Corymbia calophylla in decline in an urban parkland. Austral Ecol 34:499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamilton SD, Lawrie AC, Hopmans P, Leonard BV (1991) Effects of fuel-reduction burning on a Eucalyptus obliqua forest ecosystem in Victoria. Aust J Bot 39:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Högberg P (1997) Tansley Review No. 95: 15N natural abundance in soil-plant systems. New Phytol 137:179–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hubbard RM, Bond NJ, Ryan MG (1999) Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiol 19:165–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Humphreys FR, Lambert MJ (1965) An examination of a forest site which has exhibited the ash-bed effect. Aust J Soil Res 3:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson WD (1968) Fire, air, water and earth—an elemental ecology of Tasmania. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 3:9–16Google Scholar
  30. Khanna PK, Raison RJ, Falkiner RA (1994) Chemical properties of ash derived from Eucalyptus litter and its effect on forest soils. For Ecol Manage 66:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolb TE, Agee JK, Fulé M, McDowell NG, Pearson K, Sala A, Waring RH (2007) Perpetuating old ponderosa pine. For Ecol Manage 249:141–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambers H, Chapin FSIII, Pons TL (1998) Plant physiological ecology. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Longman VM, Keighery BJ (2002) Tuart Issues. In: Keighery BJ, Longman VM (eds) Tuart (Eucalyptus gomphocaphala) and Tuart Communities. Wildflower Society of Western Australia, Nedlands, pp 292–330Google Scholar
  34. Lunt ID (1998) Allocasuarina (Casuarinaceae) invasion of an unburnt coastal woodland at Ocean Grove, Victoria: Structural changes 1971–1996. Aust J Bot 46:649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lutz JA, van Wagtendonk JW, Thode AE (2009) Climate, lightning ignitions and fire severity in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Int J Wildland Fire 18:765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Scattered trees are keystone structures—implications for conservation. Biol Cons 132:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCaw WL, Smith RH, Neal JE (1997) Prescribed burning of thinning slash in regrowth stands of karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor) 1. Fire characteristics, fuel consumption and tree damage. Int J Wildland Fire 7:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDowell N, Brooks JR, Fitzgerald A, Bond BJ (2003) Carbon isotope discrimination and growth response of old Pinus ponderosa trees to stand density reductions. Plant Cell Environ 26:631–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Millar RB, Anderson MJ (2004) Remedies for pseudoreplication. Fish Res 70:397–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE (2008) Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12:16–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mills GA (2005) On the subsynoptic-scale meteorology of two extreme fire weather days during the Eastern Australian fires of January 2003. Aust Met Mag 54:265–290Google Scholar
  42. Mitchell RM, O’Brien DM, Campbell SK 2006. Characteristics and radiative impact of the aerosol generated by the Canberra firestorm of January 2003. J Geophys Res.-Atmospheres 111: Article Number: D02204Google Scholar
  43. Mueller-Dombois DR, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Parsons RF, Uren NC (2007) The relationship between lime chlorosis, trace elements and Mundella Yellows. Austral Plant Path 36:415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rabenhorst MC (1988) Determination of organic and carbonate carbon in calcareous soils using dry combustion. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:965–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raison RJ (1979) Modification of the soil environment by vegetation fires, with particular reference to N transformations: a review. Plant Soil 51:73–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raison RJ, Khanna PK, Woods PV (1985) Mechanisms of element transfer to the atmosphere during vegetation fires. Can J For Res 15:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata, Melbourne, pp 110–114Google Scholar
  49. Reid R (2006) Diameter-basal area ratio as a practical stand density measure for pruned plantations. For Ecol Manage 233:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ryan MG, Bond BJ, Law BE, Hubbard RM, Woodruff D, Cienciala E, Kucera K (2000) Transpiration and whole tree conductance in ponderosa pine trees of different heights. Oecologia 124:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sala A, Carey EV, Keane RE, Callaway RM (2001) Water use by whitebark pine and subalpine fir: potential consequences of fire exclusion in the northern Rocky Mountains. Tree Physiol 21:717–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shakesby RA, Chafer CJ, Doerr SH, Blake WH, Wallbrink P, Humphreys GS, Harrington BA (2003) Fire severity, water repellency characteristics and hydrogeomorphological changes following the Christmas 2001 Sydney forest fires. Aust Geo 34:147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sillett SC, Van Pelt R, Koch GW, Ambrose AR, Carroll AL, Antoine ME, Mifsud BM (2010) Increasing wood production through old age in tall trees. For Ecol Manage 259:976–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephens SL, Ruth LW (2005) Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol Apps 15:532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Edminster C, Fieldler CE, Haase S, Harrington M, Keeley JE, Knapp EE, McIver JD, Metlen K, Skinner CN, Youngblood A (2009) Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. Ecol Apps 19:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swanborough PW, Lamont BB, February EC (2003) δ13C and water-use efficiency in Australian grasstrees and South African conifers over the last century. Oecologia 136:205–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tomkins IB, Kellas JD, Tolhurst KG, Oswin DA (1991) Effects of fire intensity on soil chemistry in a eucalypt forest. Aust J Soil Res 29:25–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wallin KF, Kolb TE, Skov KR, Wagner MR (2004) Seven-year results of the influence of thinning and burning restoration treatments on pre-settlement ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Rest Ecol 12:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ward D, Lamont BB, Burrows C (2001) Grasstrees reveal contrasting fire regimes in eucalypt forest before and after European settlement of southwestern Australia. For Ecol Manage 150:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warren CR, McGrath JF, Adams MA (2001) Water availability and carbon isotope discrimination in conifers. Oecologia 127:476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Werkman T, Davidson NJ, Close DC (2008) Is decline in high altitude eucalypt forests related to rainforest understorey development and altered soil bacteria following the long absence of fire? Austral Ecol 33:880–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase in western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Westfall PH, Tobias RD, Rom D, Wolfinger RD, Hichberg Y (1999) Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using the SAS system, SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  64. Withers J, Ashton DH (1977) Studies on the status of unburnt Eucalyptus woodland at Ocean Grove, Victoria. 1 The structure and regeneration. Aust J Bot 25:623–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Youngblood A, Metlen KL, Coe K (2006) Changes in stand structure and composition after restoration treatments in low elevation dry forests of northeastern Oregon. For Ecol Manage 234:143–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dugald C. Close
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
    • 6
  • Neil J. Davidson
    • 1
    • 4
  • Perry W. Swanborough
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ross Corkrey
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Plant ScienceThe University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Bushfire CRCEast MelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Biological Sciences and BiotechnologyMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  4. 4.Forestry CRCHobartAustralia
  5. 5.Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural ResearchThe University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  6. 6.Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural ResearchHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations