Plant and Soil

, Volume 335, Issue 1–2, pp 457–468 | Cite as

Root morphology, root-hair development and rhizosheath formation on perennial grass seedlings is influenced by soil acidity

  • Rebecca E. Haling
  • Alan E. Richardson
  • Richard A. Culvenor
  • Hans Lambers
  • Richard J. Simpson
Regular Article


Perennial pasture species are important for sustainable pasture systems; yet some species display poor persistence on acid soils. This work investigated the effect of soil acidity on primary root length and root-hair and rhizosheath development of five perennial grass genotypes varying in acid-soil resistance. Plants were grown in three low-P acid soils that were limed (CaCO3) to modify soil pH (0.01 M CaCl2 extractable) from <4.3 to >5.0 and Al3+ concentrations from ≥ 16 to <4 mg kg−1 (0.01 M CaCl2 extractable). Root morphology of tall wheatgrass (Thinopyrum ponticum (Podp.) Z.-W. Liu & R.-C Wang), phalaris (Phalaris aquatica L.), cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) and weeping grass (Microlaena stipoides Labill. R. Br.) was assessed after 20–25 days growth. The root length of tall wheatgrass and phalaris cv Sirosa was sensitive to acidity, with lateral root length more sensitive to acidity than seminal root length. Lime increased the root-hair length and density of both acid-soil sensitive and resistant genotypes (cocksfoot and an acid-resistant line of phalaris) and root-hair length was positively correlated to an increase in rhizosheath size per unit root length. Restricted root length and poor root-soil contact of acid-soil sensitive genotypes may explain their low yield and relatively poor persistence on acid soils. The improvement to root-hair and rhizosheath development of genotypes that are acid-soil resistant in terms of root length demonstrates the benefit of using resistant genotypes in conjunction with liming to manage acid soils. Weeping grass was exceptional in its ability to maintain root length, root-hair and rhizosheath development in acid soil.


Aluminium Lime Gypsum pH Rhizosphere 



This research was funded by a Hackett Postgraduate Research Scholarship awarded to REH (The University of Western Australia), Meat and Livestock Australia and CSIRO. Thanks are due to Adam Stefanski and Phillip Armstrong for technical assistance.


  1. Arsenault JL, Poulcur S, Messier C, Guay R (1995) WinRHIZOTM, a root-measuring system with a unique overlap correction method. HortScience 30:906Google Scholar
  2. Bailey C, Scholes M (1997) Rhizosheath occurrence in South African grasses. S Afr J Bot 63:484–490Google Scholar
  3. Bromfield SM, Cumming RW, David DJ, Williams CH (1983) The assessment of available manganese and aluminium status in acid soils under subterranean clover pastures of various ages. Aust J Exp Agric 23:192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of phosphorus fertiliser requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 3:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford SA, Wilkens S (1998) Effect of aluminium on root elongation in two Australian perennial grasses. Aust J Plant Physiol 25:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Culvenor RA, Oram RN, Fazekas de St Groth C (1986) Variation in tolerance in Phalaris aquatica L. and a related species to aluminum in nutrient solution and soil. Aust J Agric Res 37:383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Culvenor RA, Wood JT, Avery AL, Dempsey W, McDonald SE, Ronnfeldt G, Veness PE (2004) Multi-site evaluation on acid soils of a Phalaris aquatica x P. arundinacea x P. aquatica backcross population bred for acid soil tolerance. Aust J Agric Res 55:681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delhaize E, Taylor P, Hocking PJ, Simpson RJ, Ryan PR, Richardson AE (2009) Transgenic barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) expressing the wheat aluminium resistance gene (TaALMT1) shows enhanced phosphorus nutrition and grain production when grown on an acid soil. Plant Biotechnol J 7:391–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gahoonia TS, Care D, Nielsen NE (1997) Root hairs and phosphorus acquisition of wheat and barley cultivars. Plant Soil 191:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haling RE, Simpson RJ, Delhaize E, Hocking PJ, Richardson AE (2010) Effect of lime on root growth, morphology and the rhizosheath of cereal seedlings growing in an acid soil. Plant Soil 327:191–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helyar KR, Conyers MK (1994) Ranking commercial pasture cultivar sensitivity to acidity and allocating estimated response functions to the cultivars. Final report to the Wool Research and Development Corporation on Project DAN 50. NSW Agriculture, Wagga WaggaGoogle Scholar
  12. Isbell RF (1996) The Australian soil classification. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  13. Kemp DR, Dowling PM (2000) Towards sustainable temperate perennial pastures. Aust J Exp Agric 40:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kochian LV (1995) Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 46:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krizek DT, Foy CD (1988) Role of water-stress in differential aluminum tolerance of 2 barley cultivars grown in an acid soil. J Plant Nutr 11:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li GD, Helyar KR, Conyers MK, Cullis BR, Poile GJ, Knight PG (2004) Phalaris persistence under rotational grazing on a highly acidic soil on the south-west slopes of New South Wales. Aust J Exp Agric 44:771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Magcale-Macandog DB, Whalley RDB (1994) Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of Microlaena stipoides (Labill.) R. Br. on the northern tablelands of New South Wales. Range J 16:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCully ME (1999) Roots in soil: unearthing the complexities of roots and their rhizospheres. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 50:695–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreno-Espindola IP, Rivera-Becerril F, de Jesus Ferrara-Guerrero M, De Leon-Gonzalez F (2007) Role of root-hairs and hyphae in adhesion of sand particles. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2520–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Munnich DJ, Simpson PC, Nicol HI (1991) A survey of native grasses in the Goulburn district and factors influencing their abundance. Range J 13:118–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soils and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  22. Reeve IJ, Kaine G, Lees JW, Barclay E (2000) Producer perceptions of pasture decline and grazing management. Aust J Exp Agric 40:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reuter DJ, Robinson BJ (1997) Plant analysis: an interpretation manual. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  24. Ridley AM, Slattery WJ, Helyar KR, Cowling A (1990) Acidification under grazed annual and perennial grass based pastures. Aust J Exp Agric 30:539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ridley AM, Windsor SM (1992) Persistence and tolerance to soil acidity of phalaris and cocksfoot in north-eastern Victoria. Aust J Exp Agric 32:1069–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scott BJ, Conyers MK, Poile GJ, Cullis BR (1997) Subsurface acidity and liming affect yield of cereals. Aust J Agric Res 48:843–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scott BJ, Coombes NE (2006) Poor incorporation of lime limits grain yield response in wheat. Aust J Exp Agric 46:1481–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott BJ, Fisher JA, Cullis BR (2001) Aluminium tolerance and lime increase wheat yield on the acidic soils of central and southern New South Wales. Aust J Exp Agric 41:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shainberg I, Sumner ME, Miller WP, Farina MPW, Pavan MA, Fey MV (1989) Use of gypsum on soils: a review. Adv Soil Sci 9:1–111Google Scholar
  30. Sumner ME (1993) Gypsum and acid soils: the world scene. Adv Agron 51:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tang C, Rengel Z, Abrecht D, Tennant D (2002) Aluminium-tolerant wheat uses more water and yields higher than aluminium-sensitive one on a sandy soil with subsurface acidity. Field Crops Res 78:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. von Uexkull HR, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watt M, McCully ME, Canny MJ (1994) Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L. 1. Effect of soil-water content. Plant Physiol 106:179–186PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca E. Haling
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alan E. Richardson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard A. Culvenor
    • 2
  • Hans Lambers
    • 1
  • Richard J. Simpson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, and Institute of AgricultureThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Sustainable Agriculture National Research Flagship/ CSIRO Plant IndustryCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations