Copper uptake kinetics in hydroponically-grown durum wheat (Triticum turgidum durum L.) as compared with soil’s ability to supply copper
This study investigated (a) net Cu uptake kinetics in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum durum L.) exposed to free Cu2+ activities in solution ranging from 0.4 to 2,420 nM and (b) the relative importance of plant uptake and soil’s ability to supply Cu2+ to the roots. Plant Cu flux showed a hyperbolic shape, enabling to estimate the Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters (F max and K M) for durum wheat. Plant Cu flux was then compared with soil Cu flux as assessed by the Diffusive Gradient in Thin film technique on seven soil samples. This comparison suggested that the rate-limiting process of Cu bioavailability to durum wheat would be plant uptake kinetics in most contaminated soils with the exception of moderately contaminated, calcareous soils. However, theoretical considerations targeted soil’s ability to supply Cu as the rate-limiting process in most soils for Cu (hyper-) accumulator plants with requirement larger than that of common crop species.
KeywordsBioavailability Influx Kinetics Metal Plant Rhizosphere
We thank Yves Dudal for introduction to PHREEQC, Jean-Claude Davidian, Catherine Curie and Alain Mollier for their advices about the design of the uptake kinetic experiment and Pierre Berthomieu to provide free access to F-AAS. Didier Arnal, Michael Clairotte and Lucien Roger are also acknowledged for technical assistance. We thanked the two anonymous reviewers for their very constructive comments that substantially increased the quality of the manuscript. Financial support was provided by the PNETOX programme of the French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development.
- Barber SA (1995) Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach (2nd edn). Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bravin MN (2008) Rhizosphere processes controlling the bioavailability of copper to durum wheat cultivated in former vineyard soils. PhD Thesis, Montpellier SupAgro Available via the corresponding authorGoogle Scholar
- Briat JF, Lebrun M (1999) Plant responses to metal toxicity. Compte-Rendu de l’Académie des Sciences 322:43–54Google Scholar
- Degryse F, Verheyen L, Smolders E (2009b) Reported Michaelis constants (KM) for Cd and Zn uptake by plants reflect diffusion limitations around roots, not the affinity of metal transporters. 10th ICOBTE conference, 13–18 July 2009, Chihuahua, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Hinsinger P, Courchesne F (2008) Biogeochemistry of metals and metalloids at the soil–root interface. In: Violante A, Huang PM, Gadd GM (eds) Biophysic–chemical processes of heavy metals and metalloids in soil environments. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 267–311Google Scholar
- Iwasaki K, Sakurai K, Takahashi E (1990) Copper binding by the root cell walls of Italian ryegrass and red clover. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36:431–440Google Scholar
- Martell AE, Smith RM (2003) NIST Standard Reference Database 46. NIST Standard Reference Data, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
- Morel FMM, Hering JG (1993) Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry (2nd edn). Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Mullins GL, Sommers LE, Barber SA (1986) Modeling the plant uptake of cadmium and zinc from soils treated with sewage sludge. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1245–1250Google Scholar
- Vindimian E (2001) REGTOX: macro Excel™ pour dose-réponse. Available via. http://web.cena.usp.br/apostilas/Regina/PG/QuimicaAmbiental/REGTOX_EV7.0.4.xls Accessed 13 Aug 2009