Skip to main content
Log in

How mycorrhizal associations and plant density influence intra- and inter-specific competition in two tropical tree species: Cabralea canjerana (Vell.) Mart. and Lafoensia pacari A.St.-Hil.

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) associations benefit host plants due to increased ability to obtain resources and hence may influence competitive interactions. Here we experimentally examine growth in Cabralea canjerana and Lafoensia pacari at different densities and with and without AMF. In the density treatment pots had either six or 12 individuals. Half of each treatment was innoculated with AMF and the other half was not. The proportion of each species in each pot was also varied. The AMF did not apparently influence interspecific competitive interactions because growth was similar in both treatments. However, intra-specific competition was very strong in C. canjerana while more moderate in L. pacari and both were influenced by the presence of the AMF. The AMF—Cabralea canjerana interaction was parasitic, while AMF—L. pacari interactions were mutualistic. Thus, dependence upon AMF and intraspecific interactions that result as a consequence of that dependence varies among species and may be an important influence in community structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AMF:

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

C:

carbon

C. canjerana :

Cabralea canjerana

Cii :

development (biomass) of species i when grown in monoculture

Cij :

development (biomass) of species i when grown in mixture with species j

Cji :

development (biomass) of species j when grown in mixture with species i

Cjj :

development (biomass) of species j when grown in monoculture

FURB:

Universidade Regional de Blumenau

H2O2 :

hydrogen peroxide

HCl:

Hydrochloric acid

KOH:

potassium hydroxide

L. pacari :

Lafoensia pacari

M:

mycorrhizal plants

NM:

non-mycorrhizal plants

P:

phosphorus

RY:

relative yields

TD:

total density

References

  • Allen MF (1996) The ecology of mycorrhizae. Cambridge University Press, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen EB, Allen MF (1990) The mediation of competition by mycorrhizae in successional and patchy environments. In: Grace JB, Tilman GD (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic, New York, pp 367–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen MF, Allen EB, Friese CF (1989) Responses of the non-mycotrophic plant Salsola kali to invasion by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 111:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Mortimer M, Thompson DJ (1996) Population ecology. Blackwell Science, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bethlenfalvay GJ, Brown MS, Pacovsky RS (1982) Parasitic and mutualistic associations between a mycorrhizal fungus and soybean: development of the host plant. Phytopathology 72:889–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro MAC, Siqueira JO, Davide AC, Curi LJGN, Vale FR (1996) Fungo Micorrízico e superfosfato no crescimento de espécies arbóreas tropicais. Scientia Forestalis 50:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Walker LR, Fastie CL, Sharman LC (1994) Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecol Monogr 64:149–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd JC, Boddington CL, Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Chavez C, Mansur I (2000) Mycelium of arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) from different genera: form, function and detection. Plant Soil 226:131–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francis R, Read DJ (1994) The contribuitions of mycorrhizal fungi to the determination of plant community structure. Plant Soil 159:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanetti M, Mosse B (1980) An avaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart MM, Reader RJ, Klironomos JN (2003) Plant coexistence mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Trends Ecol Evol 18:418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT (2002) The role of mycorrhizas in plant community structure and dynamics: lessons from grasslands. Plant Soil 244:319–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett DC, Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Gibson DJ (1993) Mycorrhizal influence on intra- and interspecific neighbour interactions among co-occuring prairie grasses. J Ecol 81:787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC (1989) Relationship between mycorrhizal dependency and competitive ability of two tallgrass prairie grasses. Can J Bot 67:2608–2615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick BAD, Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT, Gibson DJ (1994) Effects of mycorrhizae, phosphorus availabiliy, and plant density on yield relationsships among competing tallgrass prairie grasses. J Bot 72:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janos DP (1980) Mycorrhizae influence tropical succession. Biotropica 12:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA (1997) Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol 135:575–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MD, Smith SE (2004) Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas always 1 mutualisms? Can J Bot 82:1089–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil S, Loynachan TE, Tabatabai MA (1999) Plant determinants of mycorrhizal dependency in soybean. Agron J 91:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koide R (1985) The Nature og growth depressions in sunflower caused by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection. New Phytol 99:449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koske RE, Gemma JN (1989) A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycol Res 92:486–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kytöviita MM, Vestberg M, Tuomi J (2003) A test of mutual aid in common mycorrhizal networks: established vegetation negates benefit in seedlings. Ecology 84:898–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsham KK, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR (1995) Arbuscular mycorrhiza protect an annual grass from root pathogenic fungi in the field. J Ecol 83:991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RS, Castro PML, Dodd JC, Vosátka M (2005) Synergistic effect of Glomus intraradices and Frankia spp. on the growth and stress recovery of Alnus glutinosa in an alkaline anthropogenic sediment. Chemosphere 60:1462–1470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RS, Castro PML, Dood JC, Vosátka M (2006) Different native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence the coexistence of two plant species in a highly alkaline anthropogenic sediment. Plant Soil 287:209–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozinga WA, van Andel J, Mcdonnell-Alexander MP (1997) Nutritional soil heterogeneity and mycorrhiza as determinants of plant species diversity. Acta Bot Neerl 46:237–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualini D, Uhlmann A, Stürmer S (2007) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities influence growth and phosphorus concentration of woody plants species from the Atlantic rain forest in South Brazil. Forest Ecol Manag 245:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen CT, Sylvia DM (1996) Mycorrhiza: Ecological implications for plant interactions. In: Mukerji KG (ed) Concepts in mycorrhiza. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Plenchette C, Fortin JA, Furlan V (1983) Growth response of several plants species to mycorrhiza in a soil of moderate P fertility. I. Mycorrhizal dependency under field conditions. Plant Soil 70:191–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Siqueira JO, Franco AA (1988) Biotecnologia do solo, fundamentos e perspectivas. MEC/ABEAS/ESAL/FAEPE, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Siqueira JO, Carneiro MAC, Curi N, Rosado SCS, Davide AC (1998) Mycorrhizal colonization and mycotrophic growth of native woody species as related to successional groups in Southeastern Brazil. Forest Ecol Manage 107:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith FA, Smith SE (1996) Mutualism and parasitism: Diversity in function and structure in the “arbuscular” (VA) mycorrhizal symbiosis. Adv Bot Res 22, Academic

  • Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic 1, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM, Williams SE (1992) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and environmental stresses. In: Bethlenfalvay GJ, Linderman RG (eds) Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture. ASA, Madison, pp 101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM, Alagely AK, Chellemi DO, Demchenko LW (2001) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence tomato competition with bahiagrass. Biol Fertil Soils 34:448–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thingstrup I, Rubaek G, Sibbesen E, Jakobsen I (1998) Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) depends on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for growth and P uptake at intermediate but not high soil P levels in the field. Plant Soil 203:37–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MGA (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a determinant of plant diversity: In search of underlying mechanisms and general principles. In: van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer, Berlin, pp 243–265

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MG, Wiemken A, Sanders IR (2003) Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter coexistence and resource distribution between co-occurring plant. New Phytol 157:569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SF, Upadhyaya AA (1998) Survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 198:97–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zangaro W, Bononi VLR, Trufem SFB (2000) Mycorrhizal dependency, inoculum potential and habitat preference on native woody species in South Brazil. J Trop Ecol 16:603–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangaro W, Nisizaki SMA, Domingos JCB, Nakano EM (2003) Mycorrhizal response and successional status in 80 woody species from south Brazil. J Trop Ecol 19:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M, Moora M (1995) Interespecific competition and arbuscular mycorrhiza: importance for the coexistence of two calcareous grassland species. Folia Geobot 30:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB) for its support, as well as its Botany, Biotechnology, Immunology and Zoology laboratories and the Chemistry Department, for their support and use of their facilities. Thanks to professors Geraldo Moretto and Carlos Efrain for their help with statistics. Thanks to the Tutorial Education Program (PET/Biologia) for the financial support and the incentive for research that it enabled. James J. Roper translated this text from the original Portuguese.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aline Danieli-Silva.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Angela Hodge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danieli-Silva, A., Uhlmann, A., Vicente-Silva, J. et al. How mycorrhizal associations and plant density influence intra- and inter-specific competition in two tropical tree species: Cabralea canjerana (Vell.) Mart. and Lafoensia pacari A.St.-Hil.. Plant Soil 330, 185–193 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0191-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0191-y

Keywords

Navigation