Plant and Soil

, Volume 328, Issue 1–2, pp 291–302 | Cite as

Analysis of nickel concentration profiles around the roots of the hyperaccumulator plant Berkheya coddii using MRI and numerical simulations

  • A. B. Moradi
  • S. E. Oswald
  • J. A. Nordmeyer-Massner
  • K. P. Pruessmann
  • B. H. Robinson
  • R. Schulin
Regular Article


Investigations of soil-root interactions are hampered by the difficult experimental accessibility of the rhizosphere. Here we show the potential of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as a non-destructive measurement technique in combination with numerical modelling to study the dynamics of the spatial distribution of dissolved nickel (Ni2+) around the roots of the nickel hyperaccumulator plant Berkheya coddii. Special rhizoboxes were used in which a root monolayer had been grown, separated from an adjacent inert glass bead packing by a nylon membrane. After applying a Ni2+ solution of 10 mg l−1, the rhizobox was imaged repeatedly using MRI. The obtained temporal sequence of 2-dimensional Ni2+ maps in the vicinity of the roots showed that Ni2+ concentrations increased towards the root plane, revealing an accumulation pattern. Numerical modelling supported the Ni2+ distributions to result from advective water flow towards the root plane, driven by transpiration, and diffusion of Ni2+ tending to eliminate the concentration gradient. With the model, we could study how the accumulation pattern of Ni2+ in the root zone transforms into a depletion pattern depending on transpiration rate, solute uptake rate, and Ni2+ concentration in solution.


Berkheya coddii Concentration gradient Hyperaccumulator Magnetic resonance imaging MIN3P Modelling Nickel Uptake 



This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. We would like to thank Reto Treier (IBE, ETH Zurich) for his technical support on T 1 calculations.


  1. Aggelopoulos CA, Tsakiroglou CD (2007) The longitudinal dispersion coefficient of soils as related to the variability of local permeability. Water Air Soil Poll 185:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashworth DJ, Alloway BJ (2004) Soil mobility of sewage sludge-derived dissolved organic matter, copper, nickel and zinc. Environ Pollut 127:137–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks RR (ed) (1998) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks RR, Lee J, Reeves RD, Jaffre T (1977) Detection of nickeliferous rocks by analysis of herbarium specimens of indicator plants. J Geochem Explor 7:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks RR, Chambers MF, Nicks LJ, Robinson BH (1998) Phytomining. Trends Plant Sci 3:359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darrah PR (1993) The rhizosphere and plant nutrition—a quantitative approach. Plant Soil 156:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deoni SCL, Rutt BK, Peters TM (2003) Rapid combined T-1 and T-2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state. Magn Reson Med 49:515–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory PJ, Hinsinger P (1999) New approaches to studying chemical and physical changes in the rhizosphere: an overview. Plant Soil 211:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herrmann KH, Pohlmeier A, Wiese S, Shah NJ, Nitzsche O, Vereecken H (2002) Three-dimensional nickel ion transport through porous media using magnetic resonance imaging. J Environ Qual 31:506–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Jaillard B (2006) Rhizosphere: a new frontier for soil biogeochemistry. J Geochem Explor 88:210–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kraemer U, CotterHowells JD, Charnock JM, Baker AJM, Smith JAC (1996) Free histidine as a metal chelator in plants that accumulate nickel. Nature 379:635–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li YM, Chaney R, Brewer E, Roseberg R, Angle JS, Baker A, Reeves R, Nelkin J (2003) Development of a technology for commercial phytoextraction of nickel: economic and technical considerations. Plant Soil 249:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lombi E, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP, Young SD, Sacchi GA (2001) Physiological evidence for a high-affinity cadmium transporter highly expressed in a Thlaspi caerulescens ecotype. New Phytol 149:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayer KU, Frind EO, Blowes DW (2002) Multicomponent reactive transport modeling in variably saturated porous media using a generalized formulation for kinetically controlled reactions. Water Resour Res 38:1174–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McNear DH, Peltier E, Everhart J, Chaney RL, Sutton S, Newville M, Rivers M, Sparks DL (2005) Application of quantitative fluorescence and absorption-edge computed microtomography to image metal compartmentalization in Alyssum murale. Environ Sci Technol 39:2210–2218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moradi AB, Oswald SE, Massner JA, Pruessmann KP, Robinson BH, Schulin R (2008) Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods to reveal the real-time distribution of nickel in porous media. Eur J Soil Sci 59:476–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pierret A, Doussan C, Garrigues E, Mc Kirby J (2003) Observing plant roots in their environment: current imaging options and specific contribution of two-dimensional approaches. Agronomie 23:471–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Puschenreiter M, Schnepf A, Millan IM, Fitz WJ, Horak O, Klepp J, Schrefl T, Lombi E, Wenzel WW (2005) Changes of Ni biogeochemistry in the rhizosphere of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi goesingense. Plant Soil 271:205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson BH, Brooks RR, Howes AW, Kirkman JH, Gregg PEH (1997) The potential of the high-biomass nickel hyperaccumulator Berkheya coddii for phytoremediation and phytomining. J Geochem Explor 60:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson BH, Brooks RR, Gregg PEH, Kirkman JH (1999) The nickel phytoextraction potential of some ultramafic soils as determined by sequential extraction. Geoderma 87:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tinker PB, Nye PH (2000) Solute movement in the rhizosphere. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Treier R, Steingoetter A, Fried M, Schwizer W, Boesiger P (2007) Optimized and combined T-1 and B-1 mapping technique for fast and accurate T-1 quantification in contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI. Magn Reson Med 57:568–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wenzel WW (2005) Rhizosphere conference. J Environ Qual 34:2156–2156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wenzel WW, Wieshammer G, Fitz WJ, Puschenreiter M (2001) Novel rhizobox design to assess rhizosphere characteristics at high spatial resolution. Plant Soil 237:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whiting SN, Broadley MR, White PJ (2003) Applying a solute transfer model to phytoextraction: zinc acquisition by Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Soil 249:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wosten JHM, Vangenuchten MT (1988) Using texture and other soil properties to predict the unsaturated soil hydraulic functions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1762–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao FJ, Hamon RE, Lombi E, McLaughlin MJ, McGrath SP (2002) Characteristics of cadmium uptake in two contrasting ecotypes of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. J Exp Bot 53:535–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao FJ, Jiang RF, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2006) Cadmium uptake, translocation and tolerance in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. New Phytol 172:646–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. B. Moradi
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. E. Oswald
    • 2
  • J. A. Nordmeyer-Massner
    • 3
  • K. P. Pruessmann
    • 3
  • B. H. Robinson
    • 1
  • R. Schulin
    • 1
  1. 1.Soil Protection group, Institute of Terrestrial EcosystemsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Hydrogeology DepartmentHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Biomedical EngineeringUniversity and ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations