Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 324, Issue 1–2, pp 57–69 | Cite as

Effect of soil moisture content on the deformation behaviour of root-reinforced soils subjected to shear

  • Chia-Cheng Fan
  • Chih-Feng Su
Regular Article

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study on how soil moisture content affects the deformation behaviour within root-reinforced soils subjected to shear. In-situ shear tests were carried out in this research. The plant used in the shear tests was Prickly Sesban (Sesbania cannabina Merr.). The shear deformation within the root-reinforced soil after shear was measured. The effect of soil moisture content and the root area ratio on the development of the shear zone was investigated. The experimental results showed that the deformed shape within the soil for root-reinforced soils subjected to shear correlated well with the exponential decay function. The width of the shear zone of root-reinforced soils increases with increasing soil moisture content. Additionally, the width of the shear zone increases with increasing root area ratio. Widths of the shear zone developed in front of and beside the root structure are greater than those behind the root structure. Finally, the mechanism between the shear strength increase provided by roots and the development of the shear zone width are discussed in this paper.

Keywords

Rooted soils Water content In-situ shear tests Width of shear zone Shear strength 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work was sponsored by the National Science Council in Taiwan under the grant number NSC 95-2221-E-327 -014. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abe K, Ziemer R (1991) Effect of tree roots on a shear zone: modeling reinforced shear stress. Can J For Res 21:1012–1019 doi: 10.1139/x91-139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005) A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant Soil 278:119–134 doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Lac P, Stokes A (2007) A generic 3D finite element model of tree anchorage integrating soil mechanics and real root system architecture. Am J Bot 94(9):1506–1514 doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.9.1506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan CC, Su CF (2008) Role of roots in the shear strength of root-reinforced soils with high moisture content. Ecol Eng 33:157–166 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukuoka H, Sassa K, Wang G, Sasaki R (2006) Observation of shear zone development in ring-shear apparatus with a transparent shear box. Landslides 3:239–251 doi: 10.1007/s10346-006-0043-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray DH (1978) Role of woody vegetation in reinforcing soils and stabilising slopes. In: Proc. Symp. Soil Reinforcing and Stabilising Techniques, Sydney, Australia, pp 253–306Google Scholar
  7. Gray DH, Leiser AT (1982) Biotechnical slope protection and erosion control. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray DH, Ohashi H (1983) Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109:335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenway DR (1987) Vegetation and slope stability. In: Anderson MG, Richards KS (eds) Slope Stability. John Wiley & Sons, pp 187–230Google Scholar
  10. Normaniza O, Barakbah SS (2006) Parameters to predict slope stability—Soil water and root profiles. Ecol Eng 28:90–95 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Operstein V, Frydman S (2000) The influence of vegetation on soil strength. Ground Improv 4:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pollen N (2007) Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of streambanks: accounting for soil shear strength and moisture. Catena 69:197–205 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2006.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shewbridge SE, Sitar N (1989) Deformation characteristics of reinforced sand in direct shear. J Geotech Eng ASCE 115:1134–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shewbridge SE, Sitar N (1990) Deformation based model for reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 116:1153–1170 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:7(1153) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shewbridge SE, Sitar N (1996) Formation of shear zones in reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122:873–885 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:11(873) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Waldron LJ (1977) The shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:843–849Google Scholar
  17. Wilde SA (1958) Forest soils: their protection and relation to silviculture. Ronald, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Wu TH, McKinell WP, Swanston DN (1979) Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Can Geotech J 16:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu TH, Watson A (1998) In-situ shear tests of soil blocks with roots. Can Geotech J 35:579–590 doi: 10.1139/cgj-35-4-579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Construction Engrg.National Kaohsiung First University of Science and TechnologyKaohsiungR.O.C.
  2. 2.Dali Engineering Consultant Inc., National Kaohsiung First University of Science and TechnologyKaohsiungR.O.C.

Personalised recommendations