Plant and Soil

, Volume 295, Issue 1–2, pp 279–291 | Cite as

Benefits of alternate partial root-zone irrigation on growth, water and nitrogen use efficiencies modified by fertilization and soil water status in maize

  • Fusheng LiEmail author
  • Jihua Liang
  • Shaozhong KangEmail author
  • Jianhua Zhang
Regular Article


Alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI) is a new water-saving technique and may improve crop water use efficiency without much yield reduction. We investigated if the benefits of APRI on biomass accumulation, water and nitrogen use efficiencies could be modified by different soil fertilization and watering levels in pot-grown maize (Zea mays L. cv. super-sweet No 28, a local variety). Three irrigation methods, i.e. conventional irrigation (CI), alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI, alternate watering on both sides of the pot) and fixed partial root-zone irrigation (FPRI, fixed watering on one side of the pot), two watering levels, i.e. water deficit (W1, 45–55% of field capacity) and well-watered (W2, 70–80% of field capacity), and two N fertilization levels, i.e. no fertilization and fertilization, were designed. Results showed that APRI and FPRI methods led to more reduction in transpiration than in photosynthesis, and thus increased leaf water use efficiency (leaf WUE, i.e. the ratio of leaf net photosynthetic rate to transpiration rate). Compared to the CI treatment, APRI and FPRI increased leaf WUE by 7.7% and 8.1% before the jointing stage and 3.6% and 4.2% during the jointing stage, respectively. Under the fertilization and well-watered conditions, APRI treatment saved irrigation water by 38.4% and reduced shoot and total dry masses by 5.9% and 6.7%, respectively if compared to the CI treatment. APRI also enhanced canopy WUE (defined as the amount of total biomass per unit water used) and nitrogen (N) apparent recovery fraction (Nr, defined as the ratio of the increased N uptake to N applied) by 24.3% and 16.4%, respectively, indicating that effect of APRI can be better materialized under appropriate fertilization and water supply.


Alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI) Maize (Zea mays) Nitrogen use efficiency Fixed partial root-zone irrigation (FPRI) Water use efficiency 



We are grateful to the research grants from Chinese National Natural Science Fund (2006CB403406, 50339030), Guangxi Education Department Project (2006-26), Hong Kong Research Grant Council (HKBU 2165/05M) and Hong Kong University Grants Committee (AoE/B-07/99).


  1. Davies WJ, Zhang J (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mole Biol 42:55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Du J, Li S, Gao Y, Li S, Wang Z, Tian X (1999) Effects of N fertilizer on the mechanism of adaptation to water stress and water use of winter wheat. J Northwest Agric University 27(5):1–5Google Scholar
  3. Du T, Kang S, Zhang J, Li F, Hu X (2006) Yield and physiological responses of cotton to partial root-zone irrigation in the oasis field of northwest China. Agric Water Manage 84:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duan A, Xiao J, Zhang J, Sun J, Zhang S, Yu X, Cun W (1999) Effect of irrigation low limits on leaf water use efficiency in maize under controlled alternative furrow irrigation. Acta Agronomica Sinica 25(6):766–771Google Scholar
  5. Gong D, Kang S, Tong L, Ding R (2004) Effects of root-divided alternative irrigation on soil moisture distribution and root-trunk sap flow dynamics of peach trees. J Hydraulic Eng 10:120–127Google Scholar
  6. Gu SL, David Z, Simon G, Greg J (2000) Effect of partial rootzone drying on vine water relations, vegetative growth, mineral nutrition, yield and fruit quality in field-grown mature sauvignon blanc grapevines. Research Notes, #000702, California Agricultural Technology Institute, California State University, FresnoGoogle Scholar
  7. Han Y, Kang S (2002) Preliminary study on effects of roots-divided alternate irrigation on nutrient uptake by maize. Transactions of the CSAE 18(1):57–59Google Scholar
  8. Huang C, Li F, Qin Q, Huang C, Luo L, Nong M (2004) Effect of partial root-zone irrigation on water use of sweet corn under two fertilization levels. Water Saving Irrigation 6:8–11Google Scholar
  9. Jones HG (1992) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Kang S, Zhang J (2004) Controlled alternate partial rootzone irrigation: its physiological consequences and impact on water use efficiency. J Expl Botany 55(407):2437–2446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang S, Hu X, Du T, Zhang J, Peter J (2003) Transpiration coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of pear tree (Pyrus communis L) under alternative partial rootzone drying condition. Hydrol Processes 17(6):1165–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang S, Cai H (eds) (2002) Theory and practice of the controlled alternate partial root zone irrigation and regulated deficit irrigation. China Agricultural Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang S, Li Z, Hu X, Jirie P, Zhang L (2001) An improved water use efficiency for hot pepper grown under controlled alternate drip irrigation on partial roots. Scientia Horti 89:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang S, Hu X, Pan Y, Shi P (2000a) Soil water distribution, uniformity and water-use efficiency under alternate furrow irrigation in arid areas. Irrigation Sci 19(4):181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang S, Liang Z, Pan Y, Shi P, Zhang J (2000b) Alternate furrow irrigation for maize production in an arid area. Agric Water Manage 45:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang S, Liang Z, Hu W, Zhang J (1998) Water use efficiency of controlled alternate irrigation on root-divided maize plants. Agric Water Manage 38:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kang S, Zhang J, Liang Z, Hu X, Cai H (1997) The controlled alternative irrigation: A new approach for water saving regulation in farmland. Agric Res Arid Areas 15(1):1–6Google Scholar
  18. Kirda C, Cetin M, Dasgan Y, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ekici B, Derici MR, Ozguven AI (2004) Yield response of greenhouse grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irrigation. Agric Water Manage 69:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li F, Kang S, Zhang J, Cohen S (2003) Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment, water status and applied nitrogen on water- and nitrogen- use efficiencies of wheat. Plant Soil 254(2):279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Z, Zhang F, Kang S (2005) Impacts of the controlled roots-divided alternative irrigation on water and nutrient use of winter wheat. Transactions of the CSAE 21(8):17–21Google Scholar
  21. Liang Z, Kang S, Hu W, Zhang J, Cao J (1997) Effect of controlled root-divided alternative irrigation on water use efficiency. Transactions of the CSAE 13(4):58–63Google Scholar
  22. Liang Z, Kang S, Zhang J, Cao J (1998) Effect on water use efficiency and water-saving by controlled root-divided alternative irrigation. Scientia Agric Sinica 31(5):88–90Google Scholar
  23. Pan Y, Kang S (2000) Irrigation water infiltration in furrows and crop water use of alternative furrow irrigation. Transactions of CSAE 16(1):39–43Google Scholar
  24. Skinner RH, Hanson JD, Benjamin JG (1999) Nitrogen uptakes and partitioning under alternate-and every-furrow irrigation. Plant Soil 210:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi W, Kang S (2000) Mechanisms and effects of the controlled alternate partial rootzone irrigation in soil vertical profile for water saving. Transaction of CSAE 16(5):11–15Google Scholar
  26. Tang L, Li Y, Zhang J (2005) Physiological and yield responses of cotton under partial rootzone irrigation. Field Crops Res 94:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei Y, Liang Z (2001) Relationship between potassium and drought resistance of crops. Plant Physiol Commun 37(6):676–680Google Scholar
  28. Wu Y, Liu H, Liang Z, Kang S (1999) Photosynthesis rate and transpiration efficiency change by alternately drying and wetting on maize plant. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 19(4):605–611Google Scholar
  29. Xing W, Luo Y, Wang L, Li S, Li L (2003) Effect of different water-fertilizer spatial couplings on corn in semiarid area. I. N uptake, N residue and its environmental effect. Soils 2:118–121Google Scholar
  30. Xue Q, Chen P (1990) Effect of nitrogen nutrition of water status and photosynthesis in water under soil drought. Acta Phyto-Physiol Sin 16(1):49–56Google Scholar
  31. Zhang S, Li Y (1996) Study on effects of fertilizing on crop yield and its mechanism to raise water use efficiency. Res Soil and Water Conserv 3(1):185–191Google Scholar
  32. Zhang S, Liu G, Liu G, Xiao S (2001) Effects of osmotic stress and phosphorus deficient on growth of wheat seedings. Plant Physiol Commun 37(2):103–105Google Scholar
  33. Zhang S, Shan L, Xue Q (2000) Effects of nitrogen and phosphorous nutrition on water relation of spring wheat. Plant Nutri Fertilizer Sci 6(2):147–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural CollegeGuangxi UniversityNanningP. R. China
  2. 2.Center for Agricultural Water Research in ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingP. R. China
  3. 3.Department of BiologyHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongP. R. China

Personalised recommendations